Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Over the weekend I met a boy that was recently admitted (his dad is a college friend of DH's). He told me his son's prep started at age 6 and in later years he worked with a Columbia math professor. I had no idea!
It's not test prep. They're not prepping for the SHSAT at age 6 any more than they are prepping for the SATs at age 6. It's educational enrichment.
About half the kids at stuyvesant are on free/reduced lunch.
Very few are getting tutored by Columbia professors in middle school.
EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT.
The keys to Stuyvesant and TJ, for a large percent of smart but not really gifted kids, is: enrichment.
Mathnasium
Kumon
Russian math
AOPS
Khan
Currie
It is no secret. If the parents value education, push education, and can pay a little bit for extra enrichment, the kids will rise to the top. That cost of that Disney vacation or cruise would likely
pay for a years’ enrichment. It is a choice you, the parent, make.
Why does everyone pretend this is a mystery?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Over the weekend I met a boy that was recently admitted (his dad is a college friend of DH's). He told me his son's prep started at age 6 and in later years he worked with a Columbia math professor. I had no idea!
It's not test prep. They're not prepping for the SHSAT at age 6 any more than they are prepping for the SATs at age 6. It's educational enrichment.
About half the kids at stuyvesant are on free/reduced lunch.
Very few are getting tutored by Columbia professors in middle school.
Anonymous wrote:Over the weekend I met a boy that was recently admitted (his dad is a college friend of DH's). He told me his son's prep started at age 6 and in later years he worked with a Columbia math professor. I had no idea!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are those poor students finding money to enroll in Curie like enrichment centers that prep for the merit test?
Curie is something like $3000/year all in. If education is a priority, you can make it work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are those poor students finding money to enroll in Curie like enrichment centers that prep for the merit test?
Curie is something like $3000/year all in. If education is a priority, you can make it work.
Many start at Curie in K and have dumped like $30k into enrichemtn by the time they apply to TJ.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Notably, the FARM percentage stays relatively stable at Stuyvesant.
The FARM percentage at TJ see significant drop off.
At TJ, political agenda has made racial balancing a priority over FARMS. If race based essay selection was removed, TJ would have had more FARMS but then Asian American percent would have gone up too.
Lies. The essay isn’t “race based”. It’s a race blind process.
No, before the admissions change, there were FEWER students coming from economically-disadvantaged families: less than 1% of the admitted students for class of 2024.
The change had almost nothing to do with our students. It was driven by concerns of racial diversity.
Really? I heard the change was necessary to counter the many affluent students who had gained access to the test through elite prep.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are those poor students finding money to enroll in Curie like enrichment centers that prep for the merit test?
Curie is something like $3000/year all in. If education is a priority, you can make it work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Notably, the FARM percentage stays relatively stable at Stuyvesant.
The FARM percentage at TJ see significant drop off.
At TJ, political agenda has made racial balancing a priority over FARMS. If race based essay selection was removed, TJ would have had more FARMS but then Asian American percent would have gone up too.
Lies. The essay isn’t “race based”. It’s a race blind process.
No, before the admissions change, there were FEWER students coming from economically-disadvantaged families: less than 1% of the admitted students for class of 2024.
The change had almost nothing to do with our students. It was driven by concerns of racial diversity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are those poor students finding money to enroll in Curie like enrichment centers that prep for the merit test?
Curie is something like $3000/year all in. If education is a priority, you can make it work.
fixed typoAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Notably, the FARM percentage stays relatively stable at Stuyvesant.
The FARM percentage at TJ see significant drop off.
At TJ, political agenda has made racial balancing a priority over FARMS. If race based essay selection was removed, TJ would have had more FARMS but then Asian American percent would have gone up too.
Lies. The essay isn’t “race based”. It’s a race blind process.
No, before the admissions change, there were FEWER students coming from economically-disadvantaged families: less than 1% of the admitted students for class of 2024.
The change had almost nothing to do with poor students. It was driven by concerns of racial diversity.