Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are people saying OP said she burned 2000 in a day?
Anyway, OP, the 700 burned in a run is likely a big exaggeration.
Because that’s what OP assumed she burned. Everyone else is saying that’s crazy high.
OP here. I am going based on my Apple Watch and I was also wearing leg and arm weights while running.
What?? Are you trying to injure yourself?
It helps to burn more calories duh.
Running faster doesn't burn more calories when talking the same distance.
And if someone is so frail they cannot add a few extra pounds when walking, then they have some big issues to deal with first.![]()
Moron she said running. No one runs with ankle weights.
I run seriously and I don’t think I’ve ever heard or seen anybody run with weights. People without smooth brains do things like hill repeats. And strength training outside the running.
Anonymous wrote:Calculations and estimates are so hard to get accurate that the best advice is to just not eat back any exercise calories.
Don’t waste time playing around with all these math games in your head. If after two weeks the scale hasn’t budged then forget what you think the calories/exercise SHOULD add up to. Because for whatever reason in the real world they DON’T.
The best advice I ever got was to forget about using exercise to lose weight. Just count calories. Unless you have a huge amount of weight to lose, focusing on really being consistent with your diet for 3-4 months won’t hinder your long term exercise goals. But taking that time to make the necessary lifestyle changes to lose the 15-20lbs will jumpstart all future weight/fitness goals.
Anonymous wrote:How old are you?
I’m in my 50’s I need to eat 1200 calories to lose weight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are people saying OP said she burned 2000 in a day?
Anyway, OP, the 700 burned in a run is likely a big exaggeration.
Because that’s what OP assumed she burned. Everyone else is saying that’s crazy high.
OP here. I am going based on my Apple Watch and I was also wearing leg and arm weights while running.
What?? Are you trying to injure yourself?
It helps to burn more calories duh.
Running faster doesn't burn more calories when talking the same distance.
And if someone is so frail they cannot add a few extra pounds when walking, then they have some big issues to deal with first.![]()
Moron she said running. No one runs with ankle weights.
You believed that huh? Seriously doubt OP is "running" 4-5 miles a day. Even I didn't do that much when training in my youth for competitions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are people saying OP said she burned 2000 in a day?
Anyway, OP, the 700 burned in a run is likely a big exaggeration.
Because that’s what OP assumed she burned. Everyone else is saying that’s crazy high.
OP here. I am going based on my Apple Watch and I was also wearing leg and arm weights while running.
What?? Are you trying to injure yourself?
It helps to burn more calories duh.
Running faster doesn't burn more calories when talking the same distance.
And if someone is so frail they cannot add a few extra pounds when walking, then they have some big issues to deal with first.![]()
Moron she said running. No one runs with ankle weights.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are people saying OP said she burned 2000 in a day?
Anyway, OP, the 700 burned in a run is likely a big exaggeration.
Because that’s what OP assumed she burned. Everyone else is saying that’s crazy high.
OP here. I am going based on my Apple Watch and I was also wearing leg and arm weights while running.
What?? Are you trying to injure yourself?
It helps to burn more calories duh.
Running faster doesn't burn more calories when talking the same distance.
And if someone is so frail they cannot add a few extra pounds when walking, then they have some big issues to deal with first.![]()
Moron she said running. No one runs with ankle weights.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are people saying OP said she burned 2000 in a day?
Anyway, OP, the 700 burned in a run is likely a big exaggeration.
Because that’s what OP assumed she burned. Everyone else is saying that’s crazy high.
OP here. I am going based on my Apple Watch and I was also wearing leg and arm weights while running.
What?? Are you trying to injure yourself?
It helps to burn more calories duh.
Running faster doesn't burn more calories when talking the same distance.
And if someone is so frail they cannot add a few extra pounds when walking, then they have some big issues to deal with first.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are people saying OP said she burned 2000 in a day?
Anyway, OP, the 700 burned in a run is likely a big exaggeration.
Because that’s what OP assumed she burned. Everyone else is saying that’s crazy high.
OP here. I am going based on my Apple Watch and I was also wearing leg and arm weights while running.
What?? Are you trying to injure yourself?
Anonymous wrote:OP has yet to say what she is eating. 500 calories of cucumbers are not the same as 500 calories of potato chips.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was also wearing leg and arm weights while running.
What?? Are you trying to injure yourself?
Anonymous wrote:Why are people saying OP said she burned 2000 in a day?
Anyway, OP, the 700 burned in a run is likely a big exaggeration.