Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think you know what DEI is, here is a story about what it really is. If you object to supporting people with disabilities in this manner, you have no humanity.

https://kfor.com/news/local/oklahoma-coffee-shop-employing-those-with-special-needs-hit-by-federal-cuts/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR4aRoZ_O9GybY2W28uvqQbWbegOeE2AVutf1UNOlIW4OilBXNNV65GJtq8bLQ_aem_ltPfmgEalxS-5lsJX0F97A

it's a shame that the good DEI has been swept away along with all the shady stuff like BLM, etc.

What is the difference between disabilities and people of color in terms of what’s acceptable assistance? Neither group can control their disability/color. Both groups are traditionally discriminated against.

I think you meant "historically" - there's no "tradition" of discriminating based on disability or skin color. Regardless, focusing on merit alone (rather than discriminating to fix historical injustices) should solve for any discrimination going forward.

Please cite the moment that "historical"/"Traditional" discrimination stopped.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think you know what DEI is, here is a story about what it really is. If you object to supporting people with disabilities in this manner, you have no humanity.

https://kfor.com/news/local/oklahoma-coffee-shop-employing-those-with-special-needs-hit-by-federal-cuts/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR4aRoZ_O9GybY2W28uvqQbWbegOeE2AVutf1UNOlIW4OilBXNNV65GJtq8bLQ_aem_ltPfmgEalxS-5lsJX0F97A

it's a shame that the good DEI has been swept away along with all the shady stuff like BLM, etc.

What is the difference between disabilities and people of color in terms of what’s acceptable assistance? Neither group can control their disability/color. Both groups are traditionally discriminated against.

the coffee shop that employs people with disabilities seems like a noble enterprise, but BLM was exposed as a con where the founders made off with millions of dollars - that was my point.

BLM is one organization. It is not now nor has it ever been the entirety of DEI. Heck it wasn’t even the main thing.

Agree, it was never the "thing" - smearing DEI while invoking BLM is just a contorted right wing talking point from people who don't know better (but think they do).

BLM was barely even an organization. It had some "founders" some of whom like Patrice Cuillors were accused of grifting, but there was never any central BLM organization "in charge" or doing much coordinating.

Meanwhile on the right there has also been a ton of grifting and cons from organizations like Club for Growth, FreedomWorks, Tea Party Patriots and others who were mostly just in it for the money. Not to mention what the NRA and other right wing organizations turned into.

So I don't even get what the PP's point is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think you know what DEI is, here is a story about what it really is. If you object to supporting people with disabilities in this manner, you have no humanity.

https://kfor.com/news/local/oklahoma-coffee-shop-employing-those-with-special-needs-hit-by-federal-cuts/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR4aRoZ_O9GybY2W28uvqQbWbegOeE2AVutf1UNOlIW4OilBXNNV65GJtq8bLQ_aem_ltPfmgEalxS-5lsJX0F97A

it's a shame that the good DEI has been swept away along with all the shady stuff like BLM, etc.

What is the difference between disabilities and people of color in terms of what’s acceptable assistance? Neither group can control their disability/color. Both groups are traditionally discriminated against.

the coffee shop that employs people with disabilities seems like a noble enterprise, but BLM was exposed as a con where the founders made off with millions of dollars - that was my point.

BLM is one organization. It is not now nor has it ever been the entirety of DEI. Heck it wasn’t even the main thing.

Hey Republicans: you voted for this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think you know what DEI is, here is a story about what it really is. If you object to supporting people with disabilities in this manner, you have no humanity.

https://kfor.com/news/local/oklahoma-coffee-shop-employing-those-with-special-needs-hit-by-federal-cuts/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR4aRoZ_O9GybY2W28uvqQbWbegOeE2AVutf1UNOlIW4OilBXNNV65GJtq8bLQ_aem_ltPfmgEalxS-5lsJX0F97A

it's a shame that the good DEI has been swept away along with all the shady stuff like BLM, etc.

What is the difference between disabilities and people of color in terms of what’s acceptable assistance? Neither group can control their disability/color. Both groups are traditionally discriminated against.

I think you meant "historically" - there's no "tradition" of discriminating based on disability or skin color. Regardless, focusing on merit alone (rather than discriminating to fix historical injustices) should solve for any discrimination going forward.

You are unbelievably ignorant and gullible or you are a complete a-hole. Which is it?

Nailed it ⬆️

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think you know what DEI is, here is a story about what it really is. If you object to supporting people with disabilities in this manner, you have no humanity.

https://kfor.com/news/local/oklahoma-coffee-shop-employing-those-with-special-needs-hit-by-federal-cuts/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR4aRoZ_O9GybY2W28uvqQbWbegOeE2AVutf1UNOlIW4OilBXNNV65GJtq8bLQ_aem_ltPfmgEalxS-5lsJX0F97A

it's a shame that the good DEI has been swept away along with all the shady stuff like BLM, etc.

What is the difference between disabilities and people of color in terms of what’s acceptable assistance? Neither group can control their disability/color. Both groups are traditionally discriminated against.

I think you meant "historically" - there's no "tradition" of discriminating based on disability or skin color. Regardless, focusing on merit alone (rather than discriminating to fix historical injustices) should solve for any discrimination going forward.

If it should, why didn’t it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think you know what DEI is, here is a story about what it really is. If you object to supporting people with disabilities in this manner, you have no humanity.

https://kfor.com/news/local/oklahoma-coffee-shop-employing-those-with-special-needs-hit-by-federal-cuts/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR4aRoZ_O9GybY2W28uvqQbWbegOeE2AVutf1UNOlIW4OilBXNNV65GJtq8bLQ_aem_ltPfmgEalxS-5lsJX0F97A

it's a shame that the good DEI has been swept away along with all the shady stuff like BLM, etc.

What is the difference between disabilities and people of color in terms of what’s acceptable assistance? Neither group can control their disability/color. Both groups are traditionally discriminated against.

Unless you're Michael Jackson

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think you know what DEI is, here is a story about what it really is. If you object to supporting people with disabilities in this manner, you have no humanity.

https://kfor.com/news/local/oklahoma-coffee-shop-employing-those-with-special-needs-hit-by-federal-cuts/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR4aRoZ_O9GybY2W28uvqQbWbegOeE2AVutf1UNOlIW4OilBXNNV65GJtq8bLQ_aem_ltPfmgEalxS-5lsJX0F97A

it's a shame that the good DEI has been swept away along with all the shady stuff like BLM, etc.

What is the difference between disabilities and people of color in terms of what’s acceptable assistance? Neither group can control their disability/color. Both groups are traditionally discriminated against.

I think you meant "historically" - there's no "tradition" of discriminating based on disability or skin color. Regardless, focusing on merit alone (rather than discriminating to fix historical injustices) should solve for any discrimination going forward.

Dude, if we focused on merit alone, president, VP and the entire cabinet would not be where they are now. We should fight the real DEI, under which undeserving white people (mostly white men actually) manage to get in front of the line.

This is a silly, and racist, conclusion. Just as racist as saying DEI puts undeserving African, Latin, Asian, and Middle Eastern men and women in the front of the line.

What was wrong with what they said. No one in the cabinet is qualified. Hegseth? Kristy? Linda McMahon with didn't know the different between AI and A1 steak sauce?

LOL

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There' your DEI at work......

The push to eliminate honors programs in schools

https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2025/05/28/honors-programs-schools-delevel-detrack-education

Tracking has been a discussion in education for DECADES! It has nothing to do with the current DEI discussion. My mom was a teacher for 38 years and it was a topic 38 years ago.

Dumbing down the curriculum because "diverse" students can't handle the subject matter has been around a long time

Jeannie Oakes asked for it to to be formalized across the country and it was under the umbrella of DEI. Randi Weingarten had more power than Miguel Cardona ever did.

The progressives have completed their rot.

You think you can just run away from progressive ideas now?? This is gonna be uber inconvenient for you: you can't.

Posts like this and then posts that we are pushing kids too hard, overschedule them, push too hard for taking Algebra I in 6th grade. Narrative seems to change for convenience.

Oh and every kid takes like 9 APs just for state school admission.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There' your DEI at work......

The push to eliminate honors programs in schools

https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2025/05/28/honors-programs-schools-delevel-detrack-education

Tracking has been a discussion in education for DECADES! It has nothing to do with the current DEI discussion. My mom was a teacher for 38 years and it was a topic 38 years ago.

Dumbing down the curriculum because "diverse" students can't handle the subject matter has been around a long time

Jeannie Oakes asked for it to to be formalized across the country and it was under the umbrella of DEI. Randi Weingarten had more power than Miguel Cardona ever did.

The progressives have completed their rot.

You think you can just run away from progressive ideas now?? This is gonna be uber inconvenient for you: you can't.

Posts like this and then posts that we are pushing kids too hard, overschedule them, push too hard for taking Algebra I in 6th grade. Narrative seems to change for convenience.

Anonymous wrote:There' your DEI at work......

The push to eliminate honors programs in schools

https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2025/05/28/honors-programs-schools-delevel-detrack-education

Only in 9th grade, in an attempt to encourage all students to continue with science. Education has debated this concept for ages — do we differentiate or not? It just so happens that the students in the article are predominately poor or minority and for a variety of reasons are not as prepared as their academically-advanced peers. So check your DEI assumptions. I’m sure there are a few white people in the mix.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think you know what DEI is, here is a story about what it really is. If you object to supporting people with disabilities in this manner, you have no humanity.

https://kfor.com/news/local/oklahoma-coffee-shop-employing-those-with-special-needs-hit-by-federal-cuts/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR4aRoZ_O9GybY2W28uvqQbWbegOeE2AVutf1UNOlIW4OilBXNNV65GJtq8bLQ_aem_ltPfmgEalxS-5lsJX0F97A

it's a shame that the good DEI has been swept away along with all the shady stuff like BLM, etc.

What is the difference between disabilities and people of color in terms of what’s acceptable assistance? Neither group can control their disability/color. Both groups are traditionally discriminated against.

Because when you have a reckoning that paints all white people as oppressors and white supremacists, people push back.

We can't control our skin color, but we can vote for the backlash that is happening.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There' your DEI at work......

The push to eliminate honors programs in schools

https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2025/05/28/honors-programs-schools-delevel-detrack-education

Tracking has been a discussion in education for DECADES! It has nothing to do with the current DEI discussion. My mom was a teacher for 38 years and it was a topic 38 years ago.

Dumbing down the curriculum because "diverse" students can't handle the subject matter has been around a long time

Jeannie Oakes asked for it to to be formalized across the country and it was under the umbrella of DEI. Randi Weingarten had more power than Miguel Cardona ever did.

The progressives have completed their rot.

You think you can just run away from progressive ideas now?? This is gonna be uber inconvenient for you: you can't.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think you know what DEI is, here is a story about what it really is. If you object to supporting people with disabilities in this manner, you have no humanity.

https://kfor.com/news/local/oklahoma-coffee-shop-employing-those-with-special-needs-hit-by-federal-cuts/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR4aRoZ_O9GybY2W28uvqQbWbegOeE2AVutf1UNOlIW4OilBXNNV65GJtq8bLQ_aem_ltPfmgEalxS-5lsJX0F97A

it's a shame that the good DEI has been swept away along with all the shady stuff like BLM, etc.

What is the difference between disabilities and people of color in terms of what’s acceptable assistance? Neither group can control their disability/color. Both groups are traditionally discriminated against.

I think you meant "historically" - there's no "tradition" of discriminating based on disability or skin color. Regardless, focusing on merit alone (rather than discriminating to fix historical injustices) should solve for any discrimination going forward.

Dude, if we focused on merit alone, president, VP and the entire cabinet would not be where they are now. We should fight the real DEI, under which undeserving white people (mostly white men actually) manage to get in front of the line.

This is a silly, and racist, conclusion. Just as racist as saying DEI puts undeserving African, Latin, Asian, and Middle Eastern men and women in the front of the line.

What was wrong with what they said. No one in the cabinet is qualified. Hegseth? Kristy? Linda McMahon with didn't know the different between AI and A1 steak sauce?

Nearly the entire cabinet/admin is fox news/reality show/online personalities: Hegseth, Duffy, Judge Box O Wine, Bongino, Linda McMahon. These people are not qualified in any way shape or form for their positions. They just happen to know Trump and align with his vision of the White House as a Reality Show.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think you know what DEI is, here is a story about what it really is. If you object to supporting people with disabilities in this manner, you have no humanity.

https://kfor.com/news/local/oklahoma-coffee-shop-employing-those-with-special-needs-hit-by-federal-cuts/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR4aRoZ_O9GybY2W28uvqQbWbegOeE2AVutf1UNOlIW4OilBXNNV65GJtq8bLQ_aem_ltPfmgEalxS-5lsJX0F97A

it's a shame that the good DEI has been swept away along with all the shady stuff like BLM, etc.

What is the difference between disabilities and people of color in terms of what’s acceptable assistance? Neither group can control their disability/color. Both groups are traditionally discriminated against.

I think you meant "historically" - there's no "tradition" of discriminating based on disability or skin color. Regardless, focusing on merit alone (rather than discriminating to fix historical injustices) should solve for any discrimination going forward.

Dude, if we focused on merit alone, president, VP and the entire cabinet would not be where they are now. We should fight the real DEI, under which undeserving white people (mostly white men actually) manage to get in front of the line.

This is a silly, and racist, conclusion. Just as racist as saying DEI puts undeserving African, Latin, Asian, and Middle Eastern men and women in the front of the line.

What was wrong with what they said. No one in the cabinet is qualified. Hegseth? Kristy? Linda McMahon with didn't know the different between AI and A1 steak sauce?