Anonymous wrote:I have not read the news about it, but no matter one's opinion, certainly Harvard would litigate something like this. No need to freak out about it.
Anonymous wrote:
Appears that there was more anti-Muslim activities going on than antisemitism.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/4/30/harvard-taskforces-find-both-anti-semitism-islamophobia-on-campus
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
𫨠that was waay after I graduated from college.
I'm in a biracial marriage with kids. I guess they also did not allow multiracial children up until 2000? Wow. That's pointedly obvious discrimination.
Back to Harvard: but, what public policy is Harvard violating exactly? DEI is just "equal opportunity" badged in a different. How is that against public policy? Is Trump saying that they don't want EO anymore? Is allowing pro Palestinian protests against public policy? That would be against 1A, no?
Did you even read Harvard's own report on anti-Semitism on campus? That report is littered with smoking guns.
âMuslim women who wear hijab and pro-Palestinian students wearing keffiyehs spoke about facing verbal harassment, being called âterrorists,â and even being spat upon,â the task force said.
âThe issue of doxxing was particularly highlighted as a significant concern that affects not only physical safety and mental well-being, but also future career prospects,â it added, referring to the practice of disclosing a personâs personal or identifying information online.
Nearly half of Muslim students and staff surveyed reported feeling physically unsafe on campus, while 92 percent said they believed they would face professional or academic penalties for expressing political views.
âAs Muslim students we have been living in constant fear,â the taskforce quoted an unnamed student as saying.
âThere have been trucks driving around campus for months, displaying the faces of Muslim students⌠my peers who have lost their jobs simply for being in the leadership of Muslim faith organisations have been left out to dry once they had their offers revoked⌠If there were antisemitic trucks driving around campus and planes flying over with antisemitic slogans, I cannot help but believe Harvard would have done more to stop it.â
The task force on combating anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli bias said in its report that bias had been âfomented, practiced, and toleratedâ at Harvard and within academia more widely.
In an online survey, 26 percent of Jewish students reported feeling physically unsafe, while 39 percent said they did not feel at home at the university, the task force said.
Nearly 60 percent of Jewish students reported experiencing âdiscrimination, stereotyping, or negative biasâ due to their opinions, with only 25 percent believing there was no âacademic or professional penaltyâ for expressing their views, the task force said.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
𫨠that was way after I graduated from college.
I'm in a biracial marriage with kids. I guess they also did not allow multiracial children up until 2000? Wow. That's pointedly obvious discrimination.
Back to Harvard: but, what public policy is Harvard violating exactly? DEI is just "equal opportunity" badged in a different. How is that against public policy? Is Trump saying that they don't want EO anymore? Is allowing pro Palestinian protests against public policy? That would be against 1A, no?
Did you even read Harvard's own report on anti-Semitism on campus? That report is littered with smoking guns.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you even read Harvard's own report on anti-Semitism on campus? That report is littered with smoking guns.
Again, please identify the official Harvard policy that comports with the ruling in Bob Jones. Still waiting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Please read Harvard's own report on anti-Semitism. It has enough to incriminate itself
I'm assuming you're not a lawyer. (God, I hope not.)
Anonymous wrote:Couldnât happen to a better place
Anonymous wrote: Please read Harvard's own report on anti-Semitism. It has enough to incriminate itself
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
That is incorrect. Read the precedent below. Hopefully the lawyers that Harvard is producing know their case law, unlike DCUM.
Bob Jones University (BJU) had its tax-exempt status revoked by the IRS in the 1970s due to its racially discriminatory admissions policies. This action was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Bob Jones University v. United States (1983), which established that tax-exempt status can be denied to organizations that violate public policy, including racial discrimination. However, the university later regained its tax-exempt status after dropping the ban on interracial dating in 2000.
Please identify the Harvard policy that, under Bob Jones, justifies revoking Harvard's tax-exempt status.
Anonymous wrote:Did you even read Harvard's own report on anti-Semitism on campus? That report is littered with smoking guns.
Anonymous wrote:
𫨠that was waay after I graduated from college.
I'm in a biracial marriage with kids. I guess they also did not allow multiracial children up until 2000? Wow. That's pointedly obvious discrimination.
Back to Harvard: but, what public policy is Harvard violating exactly? DEI is just "equal opportunity" badged in a different. How is that against public policy? Is Trump saying that they don't want EO anymore? Is allowing pro Palestinian protests against public policy? That would be against 1A, no?