Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Canadian schools tend to have higher acceptance rates, but lower 4-year graduation rates than US schools. There’s less advising and support generally. Please check me on this.
Correct. Canadian school grad here. They failed easily 1/3 of their engineering students out the first year.
+1 my friend's son goes to the University of British Columbia and was told at the start of first year that they would fail 30% of the class. And he's not an engineering major. Fortunately, he survived the year but it was hard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The other big difference is that Canadian colleges don’t believe it is a main responsibility to house or feed students.
They do provide options for both, but for hosing nothing that comes close to housing even a fairly small percentage of students.
I gather it would be far easier for US schools to expand if it was made abundantly clear that student housing just isn’t their problem.
It's not even just housing--US universities are like their own towns with medical care, psychological care, activities, police, convenience stores, multiple food outlets in addition to dining halls, major sports teams , multiple concert halls, research facilities, business incubators etc. It's a big part of the US higher education experience, why it costs so much, and why it's been attractive internationally. For better and for worse, in many ways it's an entirely different enterprise than many international colleges and universities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Canadian schools tend to have higher acceptance rates, but lower 4-year graduation rates than US schools. There’s less advising and support generally. Please check me on this.
Correct. Canadian school grad here. They failed easily 1/3 of their engineering students out the first year.
+1 my friend's son goes to the University of British Columbia and was told at the start of first year that they would fail 30% of the class. And he's not an engineering major. Fortunately, he survived the year but it was hard.
Anonymous wrote:The other big difference is that Canadian colleges don’t believe it is a main responsibility to house or feed students.
They do provide options for both, but for hosing nothing that comes close to housing even a fairly small percentage of students.
I gather it would be far easier for US schools to expand if it was made abundantly clear that student housing just isn’t their problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Canadian schools tend to have higher acceptance rates, but lower 4-year graduation rates than US schools. There’s less advising and support generally. Please check me on this.
The way it should be! University of Rome, the same. Look, we are learning the brain doesn’t fully develop til 26! Judging the brain at 18 leaves a lot of smarties (late bloomers) out of the mix in US. Good on them
Anonymous wrote:Because not everyone can apply. They have a GPA cut off just to get your application read. McGill's cut-off is A- so it eliminates all the B students and below applying. Essentially, you start with a much smaller and pre-vetted denominator.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Canadian colleges don’t look at low acceptance rates as a good thing. Once it gets close to a certain threshold, they increase the seats.
Why is that not the same in the USA? Is there a governing body that requires that? Or is it just cultural
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Canadian schools tend to have higher acceptance rates, but lower 4-year graduation rates than US schools. There’s less advising and support generally. Please check me on this.
Correct. Canadian school grad here. They failed easily 1/3 of their engineering students out the first year.
Anonymous wrote:I think Canadian schools tend to have higher acceptance rates, but lower 4-year graduation rates than US schools. There’s less advising and support generally. Please check me on this.