Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I agree in theory. But also, the point is chaos. So I do think it’s possible they could send some agency a letter like that. Then, whether they actually have jobs or not would work its way through the court. But what happens in the meantime?
I honestly vacillate from thinking nothing will happen because these guys don’t know how to work in government to everything is on the table because they don’t care if they blow it all up. I guess we shall see.
Look at how long folks were out of work in 2018 with the government shutdown.
I also recall there being a day where a CR was signed at like 8am and folks didn't know whether to come into work or not.
I think everyone is being very naive.
Will they pay our health insurance premiums if there is a temporary stay in 'closure'? Allow access to computers to do our jobs?
It's going to be chaos.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think a fed wrote this. The terms used are all so wrong. It’s just someone trolling.
The president doesn’t have this kind of power.
Not a Troll, just a lowly IT worker at EPA… I don’t write policy or really get into the Govt side of things, I just keep a network of environmental monitoring systems running and love working to help the planet.
stop giving billionaire losers what they want -- your anxiety, panic, and attention.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
If you're at something like Department of Ed, even better -- they mostly just administer very popular grant programs and then do a small amount of policy making. Even if they tried to get rid of the agency it's unlikely they'd defund its operations -- they'd just transfer them back to HHS and other agencies that handled them before Ed was created in the 70s. Union contracts would make it incredibly hard for them to fire staff even if they technically dissolved the department -- you'd just transfer. It would suck but unless you are a political appointee or in one of the purely policy roles (of which there are few) then you are likely safe because the programs you work on are safe. They aren't going to stop Title 1 funds which benefit rural schools in red states enormously, for instance. And if you do happen to work in policy I think you could find a job at a think tank or with a teachers union or a variety of other orgs that work on education policy and then likely get rehired by the feds when a less stupid administration is in charge and they realize that work is actually valuable again.
The situation is not good but it's not dire. We can do this. But you have to not give up and you have to put your faith and trust in democratic systems that are older and tougher than people like Donald Trump and Elon Musk. South Korea's democracy is only like 40 years old and look how well it stood up to tyranny! We can do this.
Ah, young Jedi. Within the Department of Education is also housed the fifth largest lending operation in the United States!
Anonymous wrote:Considering Musk thinks the ACLU is a federal agency, I'm not sure what exactly is going to happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I agree in theory. But also, the point is chaos. So I do think it’s possible they could send some agency a letter like that. Then, whether they actually have jobs or not would work its way through the court. But what happens in the meantime?
I honestly vacillate from thinking nothing will happen because these guys don’t know how to work in government to everything is on the table because they don’t care if they blow it all up. I guess we shall see.
Look at how long folks were out of work in 2018 with the government shutdown.
I also recall there being a day where a CR was signed at like 8am and folks didn't know whether to come into work or not.
I think everyone is being very naive.
Will they pay our health insurance premiums if there is a temporary stay in 'closure'? Allow access to computers to do our jobs?
It's going to be chaos.
Anonymous wrote:
I agree in theory. But also, the point is chaos. So I do think it’s possible they could send some agency a letter like that. Then, whether they actually have jobs or not would work its way through the court. But what happens in the meantime?
I honestly vacillate from thinking nothing will happen because these guys don’t know how to work in government to everything is on the table because they don’t care if they blow it all up. I guess we shall see.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think a fed wrote this. The terms used are all so wrong. It’s just someone trolling.
The president doesn’t have this kind of power.
I agree in theory. But also, the point is chaos. So I do think it’s possible they could send some agency a letter like that. Then, whether they actually have jobs or not would work its way through the court. But what happens in the meantime?
I honestly vacillate from thinking nothing will happen because these guys don’t know how to work in government to everything is on the table because they don’t care if they blow it all up. I guess we shall see.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think a fed wrote this. The terms used are all so wrong. It’s just someone trolling.
The president doesn’t have this kind of power.
Not a Troll, just a lowly IT worker at EPA… I don’t write policy or really get into the Govt side of things, I just keep a network of environmental monitoring systems running and love working to help the planet.
stop giving billionaire losers what they want -- your anxiety, panic, and attention.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think a fed wrote this. The terms used are all so wrong. It’s just someone trolling.
The president doesn’t have this kind of power.
Not a Troll, just a lowly IT worker at EPA… I don’t write policy or really get into the Govt side of things, I just keep a network of environmental monitoring systems running and love working to help the planet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think a fed wrote this. The terms used are all so wrong. It’s just someone trolling.
The president doesn’t have this kind of power.
I agree in theory. But also, the point is chaos. So I do think it’s possible they could send some agency a letter like that. Then, whether they actually have jobs or not would work its way through the court. But what happens in the meantime?
I honestly vacillate from thinking nothing will happen because these guys don’t know how to work in government to everything is on the table because they don’t care if they blow it all up. I guess we shall see.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think a fed wrote this. The terms used are all so wrong. It’s just someone trolling.
The president doesn’t have this kind of power.