Anonymous wrote:Yesterday, on AN25 one of Sara H colleague suggested a 34 ACT should only be submitted to Vanderbilt for early decision (25%), but not regular decision based on their large data set of who has been successful in the past.
In RD Vanderbilt only wants 35/36 and truly is test optional.
I’ve seen similar anecdotal advice on here.
Test scores are truly a case-by-case decision IF a school is truly and honestly test optional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What kind of schools with so few submit scores?
Most.
Most colleges admit everyone who applies. 25% is low for R1s/T100s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People submit less as the scores submitted are "fake".
Meaning pre Test Optional a school would get 50 thousand test scores that range from around 900 to 1,600. So someone in the middle with a 1,250 test score submits.
Today all the kids with 900-1,200 wont submit leaving the ones submitted range of 1,200 to 1,600 with a 1,400 average.
All at once your 1,250 test score looks terrible so you dont submit.
The TO thing just shows how grossly incompetent AOs are. TO should have always been reported as 0 in the stats. But AO is a jobs program for humanities majors who can’t count.
Anonymous wrote:People submit less as the scores submitted are "fake".
Meaning pre Test Optional a school would get 50 thousand test scores that range from around 900 to 1,600. So someone in the middle with a 1,250 test score submits.
Today all the kids with 900-1,200 wont submit leaving the ones submitted range of 1,200 to 1,600 with a 1,400 average.
All at once your 1,250 test score looks terrible so you dont submit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What kind of schools with so few submit scores?
Northeastern and UW-Seattle are two I know of. I would assume Northeastern because it’s taking kids without scores in ED, and UW because its applicant pool has so much overlap with the applicant pool for California state schools (which are test blind).
That’s interesting, DC was rejected by Northeastern with 1570 and 4.0uw
Your kid was too qualified for NE.
It's hilarious and sad that people keep spreading lies about the type of student that applies to NEU. I don't know a single smart student among our kids' friends and associates (sports and clubs) who have that school even as a safety. These are dozens and dozens of kids who are applying to T10/T25 schools and NEU hasn't come up once.
https://uds.northeastern.edu/cds/2018-2019/
https://www.businessinsider.com/the-50-smartest-colleges-in-america-2016-10#25-northeastern-university-average-sat-1435-26
This was around 2018 pre-Covid when test was mandatory.
Northeastern was #25 for average SAT.
The schools gets 100K apps with single digit acceptance rate.
Numbers and data make you dumba$$.
We live in the 21st century. Keep up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What kind of schools with so few submit scores?
Northeastern and UW-Seattle are two I know of. I would assume Northeastern because it’s taking kids without scores in ED, and UW because its applicant pool has so much overlap with the applicant pool for California state schools (which are test blind).
That’s interesting, DC was rejected by Northeastern with 1570 and 4.0uw
Your kid was too qualified for NE.
It's hilarious and sad that people keep spreading lies about the type of student that applies to NEU. I don't know a single smart student among our kids' friends and associates (sports and clubs) who have that school even as a safety. These are dozens and dozens of kids who are applying to T10/T25 schools and NEU hasn't come up once.
Anonymous wrote:What kind of schools with so few submit scores?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What kind of schools with so few submit scores?
Most.
Anonymous wrote:What kind of schools with so few submit scores?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Boy, I really feel for the professors in hard classes who teach the A students who got a 1600 on the sat alongside the A students who got a 1100 or 1200 (or would have if they took it). It must be so frustrating for everyone involved.
What are you talking about? Pre COVID only the highest test scores or smartest kids took the hard classes?
Anonymous wrote:Boy, I really feel for the professors in hard classes who teach the A students who got a 1600 on the sat alongside the A students who got a 1100 or 1200 (or would have if they took it). It must be so frustrating for everyone involved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:100% yes. even if it's 25% on the dot
Really? I wouldn't submit if it's 25% on the dot. I would if closer to 50 percentile.
Anonymous wrote:Boy, I really feel for the professors in hard classes who teach the A students who got a 1600 on the sat alongside the A students who got a 1100 or 1200 (or would have if they took it). It must be so frustrating for everyone involved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What kind of schools with so few submit scores?
Northeastern and UW-Seattle are two I know of. I would assume Northeastern because it’s taking kids without scores in ED, and UW because its applicant pool has so much overlap with the applicant pool for California state schools (which are test blind).
That’s interesting, DC was rejected by Northeastern with 1570 and 4.0uw
Your kid was too qualified for NE.