Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shilling a product to put cash in your pocket is really not classy.

Girl, I thought you were better than this. It’s embarrassing. They don’t need the money. So weird.

Maybe she does need the money 🤷

Could be a sign that things are not great in their marriage….

I wonder if they are burning through money…as many “new money” people often do.

Regardless, it’s very tacky.

I’m just a retired suburban mom and I wouldn’t want to be offering samples at Costco.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The drink doesn’t meet the nutritional standards she forced American schools to adopt via her Healthy, Hunger free kids food program. Hmmmmmm.

"Forced?"

Yes, forced. Federal law is mandatory.

Kids didn't care about the law. They just threw their meals into the trash. Social media was flooded with pictures of trashcans full of school kids meals around then.
The schools and cafeterias didn't care they lost business and more kids brought their own lunches, they got that federal money either way.

federal money? You misspelled taxpayer dollars. It’s taxpayers paying for school breakfast and lunches. Not the federal government.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The drink doesn’t meet the nutritional standards she forced American schools to adopt via her Healthy, Hunger free kids food program. Hmmmmmm.

"Forced?"

Yes, forced. Federal law is mandatory.

Kids didn't care about the law. They just threw their meals into the trash. Social media was flooded with pictures of trashcans full of school kids meals around then.
The schools and cafeterias didn't care they lost business and more kids brought their own lunches, they got that federal money either way.

Schools only receive federal money if they serve a student a reimbursable meal.

If a student brings a lunch to school, the school cafeteria/district nutrition program doesn’t receive any federal reimbursement/money. The schools must provide documentation for each reimbursable meal that they serve to each student every day at both breakfast and lunch.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The drink doesn’t meet the nutritional standards she forced American schools to adopt via her Healthy, Hunger free kids food program. Hmmmmmm.

To be fair, she wasn't making bank on that as she is on this.

Of course…when it’s time to make money, standards? Huh? Oh, you mean my money? That’s the standard.

No current or former American politician or family member of an American politician is doing anything known to the public without there being a price tag involved in some shape or form. It's all they know. I love the Obamas and wish them success in any of their endeavors.

Shilling apple juice flavored with genetically modified fruit concentrate and genetically modified corn fiber and calling it healthy while talking about her role as FLOTUS and nutrition and health programs during the Obama administration is not something I ever expected to see Michelle doing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The drink doesn’t meet the nutritional standards she forced American schools to adopt via her Healthy, Hunger free kids food program. Hmmmmmm.

"Forced?"

Yes, forced. Federal law is mandatory.

Kids didn't care about the law. They just threw their meals into the trash. Social media was flooded with pictures of trashcans full of school kids meals around then.
The schools and cafeterias didn't care they lost business and more kids brought their own lunches, they got that federal money either way.

Ok, but facts matter: schools were forced by federal law to change their nutrition standards and meal programs.

The schools and cafeterias did care that they lost business, they just couldn’t do anything about it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The drink doesn’t meet the nutritional standards she forced American schools to adopt via her Healthy, Hunger free kids food program. Hmmmmmm.

To be fair, she wasn't making bank on that as she is on this.

Of course…when it’s time to make money, standards? Huh? Oh, you mean my money? That’s the standard.

No current or former American politician or family member of an American politician is doing anything known to the public without there being a price tag involved in some shape or form. It's all they know. I love the Obamas and wish them success in any of their endeavors.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The drink doesn’t meet the nutritional standards she forced American schools to adopt via her Healthy, Hunger free kids food program. Hmmmmmm.

"Forced?"

Yes, forced. Federal law is mandatory.

Kids didn't care about the law. They just threw their meals into the trash. Social media was flooded with pictures of trashcans full of school kids meals around then.
The schools and cafeterias didn't care they lost business and more kids brought their own lunches, they got that federal money either way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The drink doesn’t meet the nutritional standards she forced American schools to adopt via her Healthy, Hunger free kids food program. Hmmmmmm.

"Forced?"

The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 is a federal law that was signed into law by President Barack Obama to improve access to healthy food for children in the United States.

Yes, forced. Federal law is mandatory.

Anonymous wrote:I saw that and looked it up. It's made with monk fruit so "better" for you than soda. That being said I hate the whole celebrity consumerist trend encouraging needless spending and useless products.

It's still going to be full of sugar.

This is disappointing.

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully it will do better than Trump wine.

Trump has a vinyard? Interesting. Have a link for that?

Anonymous wrote:Actually embarrassing for a First Lady to be hawking products at Costco.

Fits right in the timeline for reaching "Idiocracy" movie levels sooner than expected.

"Welcome to Costco! We love you! Buy some Brawndo, It's the thirst mutilator and has what you crave!"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shilling a product to put cash in your pocket is really not classy.

Girl, I thought you were better than this. It’s embarrassing. They don’t need the money. So weird.

Maybe she does need the money 🤷

Could be a sign that things are not great in their marriage….

I think you're thinking of Melania...

Anonymous wrote:Shilling a product to put cash in your pocket is really not classy.

Girl, I thought you were better than this. It’s embarrassing. They don’t need the money. So weird.

Maybe she does need the money 🤷

Could be a sign that things are not great in their marriage….