Anonymous wrote:The screen is to lower cost so they don't have extra wiring, knobs, buttons, etc. Tesla's Elon said cars have like miles of wiring in them and is looking to lower the cost. He stumbled on screens and everyone else copied.
So it might be only luxury cars that have buttons and knobs.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I hear you. I like keys and actual gear shifters, too. As far as manually cranking the windows and locking / unlocking the door, I don't remember anything ever going wrong with this. On the other hand, windows and locks have both broken in "modern" vehicles I have had, as has the electronic parking brake.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is the equivalent of someone 30 years ago asking what new car they can buy that you can manually crank the windows.
Not really. It's pretty well documented that there's pushback from buyers on going to screens and menus, and some manufacturers are looking to bring back more buttons and knobs. To me, a better analogy would be those horrible motorized seatbelts that were all the rage back in the earl '90s. Those didn't stick around, did they?
Perfect analogy. It turned out that those motorized seatbelts were actually more dangerous because people often would forget or choose not to use the lap belt, which was still manual. The motorized seatbelt was effective only if both were used. Presumably good intentions and all, but it turns out that it was very poor design. Same will happen with the touchscreens to the total exclusion of buttons. I think the Mercedes solution a PP mentions above is likely to end up being the right answer; people want a combo of screen and buttons.
lol no, sorry old people touch screens along with digital gauges are here to stay. i also appreciate my indoor plumbing
https://www.motortrend.com/news/new-car-interior-touchscreen-euro-ncap-safety-testing/
So, wait, the poster responding that we’re all just old and stupid might not know what they’re talking about?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is the equivalent of someone 30 years ago asking what new car they can buy that you can manually crank the windows.
Not really. It's pretty well documented that there's pushback from buyers on going to screens and menus, and some manufacturers are looking to bring back more buttons and knobs. To me, a better analogy would be those horrible motorized seatbelts that were all the rage back in the earl '90s. Those didn't stick around, did they?
Perfect analogy. It turned out that those motorized seatbelts were actually more dangerous because people often would forget or choose not to use the lap belt, which was still manual. The motorized seatbelt was effective only if both were used. Presumably good intentions and all, but it turns out that it was very poor design. Same will happen with the touchscreens to the total exclusion of buttons. I think the Mercedes solution a PP mentions above is likely to end up being the right answer; people want a combo of screen and buttons.
lol no, sorry old people touch screens along with digital gauges are here to stay. i also appreciate my indoor plumbing
https://www.motortrend.com/news/new-car-interior-touchscreen-euro-ncap-safety-testing/
Anonymous wrote:I’m 46 and would prefer touch buttons. DH is 47 and is about to buy a BMW one year old specifically because it still has buttons. I hate driving his Tesla, it’s not intuitive and it’s unsafe for me to try to figure out the temp control while driving. I use touchscreens on everything else so it’s not like I can’t figure it out, I just prefer buttons on cars. Take a back seat gen z’ers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is the equivalent of someone 30 years ago asking what new car they can buy that you can manually crank the windows.
Not really. It's pretty well documented that there's pushback from buyers on going to screens and menus, and some manufacturers are looking to bring back more buttons and knobs. To me, a better analogy would be those horrible motorized seatbelts that were all the rage back in the earl '90s. Those didn't stick around, did they?
Perfect analogy. It turned out that those motorized seatbelts were actually more dangerous because people often would forget or choose not to use the lap belt, which was still manual. The motorized seatbelt was effective only if both were used. Presumably good intentions and all, but it turns out that it was very poor design. Same will happen with the touchscreens to the total exclusion of buttons. I think the Mercedes solution a PP mentions above is likely to end up being the right answer; people want a combo of screen and buttons.
lol no, sorry old people touch screens along with digital gauges are here to stay. i also appreciate my indoor plumbing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is the equivalent of someone 30 years ago asking what new car they can buy that you can manually crank the windows.
Not really. It's pretty well documented that there's pushback from buyers on going to screens and menus, and some manufacturers are looking to bring back more buttons and knobs. To me, a better analogy would be those horrible motorized seatbelts that were all the rage back in the earl '90s. Those didn't stick around, did they?
Perfect analogy. It turned out that those motorized seatbelts were actually more dangerous because people often would forget or choose not to use the lap belt, which was still manual. The motorized seatbelt was effective only if both were used. Presumably good intentions and all, but it turns out that it was very poor design. Same will happen with the touchscreens to the total exclusion of buttons. I think the Mercedes solution a PP mentions above is likely to end up being the right answer; people want a combo of screen and buttons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 2024 Mercedes has buttons and a screen. I greatly prefer the buttons.
Which buttons does it include (temp, etc)? I dislike the screen as I find it distracting and I have to take my eyes off the road to hit the right spot on the screen.
Thank you
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is the equivalent of someone 30 years ago asking what new car they can buy that you can manually crank the windows.
Not really. It's pretty well documented that there's pushback from buyers on going to screens and menus, and some manufacturers are looking to bring back more buttons and knobs. To me, a better analogy would be those horrible motorized seatbelts that were all the rage back in the earl '90s. Those didn't stick around, did they?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is the equivalent of someone 30 years ago asking what new car they can buy that you can manually crank the windows.
Not really. It's pretty well documented that there's pushback from buyers on going to screens and menus, and some manufacturers are looking to bring back more buttons and knobs. To me, a better analogy would be those horrible motorized seatbelts that were all the rage back in the earl '90s. Those didn't stick around, did they?

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is the equivalent of someone 30 years ago asking what new car they can buy that you can manually crank the windows.
Not really. It's pretty well documented that there's pushback from buyers on going to screens and menus, and some manufacturers are looking to bring back more buttons and knobs. To me, a better analogy would be those horrible motorized seatbelts that were all the rage back in the earl '90s. Those didn't stick around, did they?