Anonymous wrote:I recently discovered that we are expecting a baby girl! My mother-in-law is an absolute angel, and I would love to surprise her by naming our daughter after her. Her full name is Judith, but she never goes by that. Do you think Judy is too old-fashioned? If we decide to honor my mother-in-law, should we go with Judith and use Judy as a nickname, or simply give it to her as a middle name?
Anonymous wrote:Eeeeeew, sorry I hate the name. I know a Judy and she’s weird. I don’t like her.
My problemo. Name your child whatever you want. Just love her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am surprised that I like it.
What about Judith Jane (lean into the boomer thing) and call her JJ.
I wouldn't to Judy as a first name. I know a Kathy who isn't Katherine, and she hates it. Given name is a nn.
Agree with all of this except Judith Jane. Judith feels fresh compared to the trends it feels like we've been swimming in for ages - surnames, flowery Romance language names ending in -a, and unisex hipster.
I'm the JJ poster. I'm not married to Judith Jane. But I do love JJ as a nn vs Judy. And I hear you. I am surrounded by unisex hipster names.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am surprised that I like it.
What about Judith Jane (lean into the boomer thing) and call her JJ.
I wouldn't to Judy as a first name. I know a Kathy who isn't Katherine, and she hates it. Given name is a nn.
Agree with all of this except Judith Jane. Judith feels fresh compared to the trends it feels like we've been swimming in for ages - surnames, flowery Romance language names ending in -a, and unisex hipster.
Anonymous wrote:I am surprised that I like it.
What about Judith Jane (lean into the boomer thing) and call her JJ.
I wouldn't to Judy as a first name. I know a Kathy who isn't Katherine, and she hates it. Given name is a nn.