Anonymous wrote:Unpopular opinion ‼️ 🚨
We are 45, have a child headed off to college next year, another one 3 years behind him and are mortgage free. It is the most liberating feeling for me. When I have a bad day at work I’m like, whatever. I get to finish out the rest of my life without a mortgage.
Anonymous wrote:Unpopular opinion ‼️ 🚨
We are 45, have a child headed off to college next year, another one 3 years behind him and are mortgage free. It is the most liberating feeling for me. When I have a bad day at work I’m like, whatever. I get to finish out the rest of my life without a mortgage.
Anonymous wrote:the top federal tax rate is 37%.
treasuries are not subject to state/local tax.
3 week - 30 year treasuries yield 4.45 -5.51%. After tax this is 2.8% - 3.47%. At 24% tax rate it's 3.4% - 4.2%.
If you choose to pay down a dollar of mortgage early instead of buying treasuries at higher after tax yields you are giving up liquidity and taking higher risk while deploying capital at a low return. You could even take a little more risk (investment grade bonds, stocks, etc, but I want to use the pure treasury to illustrate that it's just not time to pay down mortgage early).
If you've won the right to be suboptimal by accumulating a boatload of assets such that you just don'e want to deal with having a mortgage than fine, but if you're asking questions here, you probably haven't done that.
Don't take more risk for lower return. Don't give the banks and mortgage backed securities holders of america back their money before you have to. a low rate mortgage is an asset.
Anonymous wrote:He /she recasted twice, so I'm pretty sure they know what they did. You can go to an online mortgage recast calculator and see the results and the benefits to the participant. You put down a sizable lump sum, and your loan gets reamortized. So with less principal due your monthly payment decrease and the total interest paid at completion of the loan will decrease. So you do end up saving money on interest paid. The term of the loan is not changed, as when you make extra payments the loan will get paid off faster.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s what I would do. Take half of your inheritance and pay down the mortgage. Do not recast your mortgage, but keep the same monthly payments as before. Invest/save the rest based on your risk tolerance. Depending on when you retire, your mortgage will be very low because of all the extra payments. (There are online calculators that you can find.) At that time, you can choose to recast.
Best of luck!
You don’t get recasting. If you pay a lump sum or even extra monthly you want to recast. It saved us a lot of money. You can recast multiple times. We did it twice.
Actually, it costs you money, it doesn't save money. When you recast, you will have paid more in interest by the time you will have paid the mortgage back compared to if you didn't recast.
Perhaps you meant that you had lower monthly payments, but it wasn't savings. By recasting your mortgage, you essentially took out a loan to get the monthly "savings."
I'm retired and live in NOVA with increasing property taxes each year. If and when in the next few years, a few stock positions blossom, I may prune stocks(cyclical stocks) and apply some of that money into a recasting. Something I'm considering for cash flow purposes. I have no intention in paying off my 3.25% now 27 yr loan early. Each case is specific to that person's circumstances. And the math doesn't lie, financial institutions are underwater on all those low mortgages.
He /she recasted twice, so I'm pretty sure they know what they did. You can go to an online mortgage recast calculator and see the results and the benefits to the participant. You put down a sizable lump sum, and your loan gets reamortized. So with less principal due your monthly payment decrease and the total interest paid at completion of the loan will decrease. So you do end up saving money on interest paid. The term of the loan is not changed, as when you make extra payments the loan will get paid off faster.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s what I would do. Take half of your inheritance and pay down the mortgage. Do not recast your mortgage, but keep the same monthly payments as before. Invest/save the rest based on your risk tolerance. Depending on when you retire, your mortgage will be very low because of all the extra payments. (There are online calculators that you can find.) At that time, you can choose to recast.
Best of luck!
You don’t get recasting. If you pay a lump sum or even extra monthly you want to recast. It saved us a lot of money. You can recast multiple times. We did it twice.
Actually, it costs you money, it doesn't save money. When you recast, you will have paid more in interest by the time you will have paid the mortgage back compared to if you didn't recast.
Perhaps you meant that you had lower monthly payments, but it wasn't savings. By recasting your mortgage, you essentially took out a loan to get the monthly "savings."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s what I would do. Take half of your inheritance and pay down the mortgage. Do not recast your mortgage, but keep the same monthly payments as before. Invest/save the rest based on your risk tolerance. Depending on when you retire, your mortgage will be very low because of all the extra payments. (There are online calculators that you can find.) At that time, you can choose to recast.
Best of luck!
You don’t get recasting. If you pay a lump sum or even extra monthly you want to recast. It saved us a lot of money. You can recast multiple times. We did it twice.
I do understand recasting. My whole point was to keep the payments unchanged in order to pay down the mortgage quicker. Sure, your monthly payments do go down when you recast, but it does not save you any money in the long run.
DP but OP wasn't asking about saving money in the long run. "DH wants to have cash on hand to be able to walk away from a job if he ever wanted to." Recast doesn't "save" money but it does free up money, which would have the desired effect for their family while meeting both her and her DH's goals. A smaller monthly obligation means more flexibility for him; putting a lump sum in means a smaller debt obligation for her. Win-win.
This may not be what OP is asking for, but this makes a lot of sense financially. Either OP's DH makes no money/is a very close to retirement or he is delusional that he can walk away from his job, just because he now has, say $800k extra in savings.
I would put it all in the market, but I don't have the same set of considerations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s what I would do. Take half of your inheritance and pay down the mortgage. Do not recast your mortgage, but keep the same monthly payments as before. Invest/save the rest based on your risk tolerance. Depending on when you retire, your mortgage will be very low because of all the extra payments. (There are online calculators that you can find.) At that time, you can choose to recast.
Best of luck!
You don’t get recasting. If you pay a lump sum or even extra monthly you want to recast. It saved us a lot of money. You can recast multiple times. We did it twice.
I do understand recasting. My whole point was to keep the payments unchanged in order to pay down the mortgage quicker. Sure, your monthly payments do go down when you recast, but it does not save you any money in the long run.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s what I would do. Take half of your inheritance and pay down the mortgage. Do not recast your mortgage, but keep the same monthly payments as before. Invest/save the rest based on your risk tolerance. Depending on when you retire, your mortgage will be very low because of all the extra payments. (There are online calculators that you can find.) At that time, you can choose to recast.
Best of luck!
You don’t get recasting. If you pay a lump sum or even extra monthly you want to recast. It saved us a lot of money. You can recast multiple times. We did it twice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s what I would do. Take half of your inheritance and pay down the mortgage. Do not recast your mortgage, but keep the same monthly payments as before. Invest/save the rest based on your risk tolerance. Depending on when you retire, your mortgage will be very low because of all the extra payments. (There are online calculators that you can find.) At that time, you can choose to recast.
Best of luck!
You don’t get recasting. If you pay a lump sum or even extra monthly you want to recast. It saved us a lot of money. You can recast multiple times. We did it twice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s what I would do. Take half of your inheritance and pay down the mortgage. Do not recast your mortgage, but keep the same monthly payments as before. Invest/save the rest based on your risk tolerance. Depending on when you retire, your mortgage will be very low because of all the extra payments. (There are online calculators that you can find.) At that time, you can choose to recast.
Best of luck!
You don’t get recasting. If you pay a lump sum or even extra monthly you want to recast. It saved us a lot of money. You can recast multiple times. We did it twice.
Anonymous wrote:We are mid 30s and we chose to invest the significant proceeds of our first home sale into our brokerage versus recasting our new, larger mortgage. However in your case I would probably lean towards a recast and continue to make the same payments to pay it down faster. Approaching retirement is a game changer.
Anonymous wrote:Here’s what I would do. Take half of your inheritance and pay down the mortgage. Do not recast your mortgage, but keep the same monthly payments as before. Invest/save the rest based on your risk tolerance. Depending on when you retire, your mortgage will be very low because of all the extra payments. (There are online calculators that you can find.) At that time, you can choose to recast.
Best of luck!