Anonymous wrote:You tell them not to agree to it. This is a red flag.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks for all the tips. Obviously our DC will find a qualified attorney.
I don’t believe a prenup is a red flag at all. I appreciate the post about how they will live in particular because I suspect they will live in a house paid for at least in part by trust funds etc and was wondering about that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Best prenup I saw was the spouse received 1 percent of the wealth per year of marriage up to 50 percent with a 2 percent bonus for each child brought into the marriage.
Wow 1% extra bonus for carrying, birthing and raising a child! How incredibly generous and not at all evocative of what the wealthy partner thinks of the value of women![]()
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Find an attorney who is used to representing the person who has been asked to sign one. They will know exactly what to do and what to advise.
This. Your kid needs her own lawyer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Best prenup I saw was the spouse received 1 percent of the wealth per year of marriage up to 50 percent with a 2 percent bonus for each child brought into the marriage.
Seriously?! Wow. Very interesting. Are you an attorney?
So only ~12-14% after 10 years of marriage? In what universe is that a good prenup?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Think about scenarios where the rich spouse dies, and what happens to their assets and what the surviving spouse would inherit. Probably would want that to be more than just life insurance. If the surviving spouse would need a chunk of the inheritance (say surviving spouse was a SAHP), figure that out. If there’s a divorce, there must be a way to keep the parties from trying to hide assets. An experienced lawyer will know. Good for all of you for not taking it personally.
OP here. These are scenarios we are wondering about. Hard to say which parent would stay at home but would want surviving spouse to be able to care for kids. DH and I have lost siblings in their parenting prime and life for survivors can be a disaster!
Anonymous wrote:Family assets a spouse brings to the marriage are protected, as would be any inheritance provided assets aren't commingled. Otherwise any wealth acquired during the marriage should be evenly split. I would tell your DC not to agree to anything less than that. If there are education trusts in the mix, wonderful, but shouldn't be relevant to a pre-nup.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Best prenup I saw was the spouse received 1 percent of the wealth per year of marriage up to 50 percent with a 2 percent bonus for each child brought into the marriage.
Seriously?! Wow. Very interesting. Are you an attorney?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they will live in a house bought by the trust and owned only by one partner it means your child is foregoing one of the key ways to build wealth. Ditto for vacation homes or other investment. Similar situation if trust funder decides not to work or work a low paying part time hobby job, little joint wealth accumulation.
Your child should think of this as marrying someone who may bring very little to the joint pot.
+1 ding ding ding
I even read a story in here about soon-to-be XW who was going to owe her layabout trust fund husband alimony because he would not work and would not use a dime of his trust fund on their joint lives.
I’m not against prenupts, but you should have your eyes wide open about every aspect of how this kind of situation can turn out.
I also know two people in this situation where they are divorcing someone very wealthy, will leave with nothing, and need to pay alimony because the ex doesn't (need to) work. Your child needs to think seriously about worst case scenarios. What if they settle in an expensive area and have a disabled child or is disabled themselves? I'm not interested in taking my spouses family business or fortune, but if I'm with someone for decades who has great wealth, I want to know that my kids and I will be able to maintain a reasonable lifestyle. I know too many cases of wealthy spouses who deny their soon to be ex access to funds, get the hotshot lawyer, and get what they want by threatening to go for sole custody.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they will live in a house bought by the trust and owned only by one partner it means your child is foregoing one of the key ways to build wealth. Ditto for vacation homes or other investment. Similar situation if trust funder decides not to work or work a low paying part time hobby job, little joint wealth accumulation.
Your child should think of this as marrying someone who may bring very little to the joint pot.
+1 ding ding ding
I even read a story in here about soon-to-be XW who was going to owe her layabout trust fund husband alimony because he would not work and would not use a dime of his trust fund on their joint lives.
I’m not against prenupts, but you should have your eyes wide open about every aspect of how this kind of situation can turn out.
Anonymous wrote:Best prenup I saw was the spouse received 1 percent of the wealth per year of marriage up to 50 percent with a 2 percent bonus for each child brought into the marriage.
Anonymous wrote:Best prenup I saw was the spouse received 1 percent of the wealth per year of marriage up to 50 percent with a 2 percent bonus for each child brought into the marriage.