Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I went out with my girlfriends in college we always had a pact to watch each other’s backs and we all left together. Always. Period. And that was before cellphones!

I can’t imagine letting my girlfriend get blackout throw-up drunk and letting her leave with a man we just met. And then shrugging off that she was missing the next morning? No, just no. Those are terrible friends.

Agree. The recent videos show she was in no position to consent. That is when friends take you home. And when real men take you home instead of trying to get some action (technically it is rape).

He was also in no state to consent to anything she did to him.

He is twice her size.

And ALIVE.

And based on his story, that is probably because he was a better swimmer. Which is not a crime.

He was also in no state to consent to anything she did to him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I went out with my girlfriends in college we always had a pact to watch each other’s backs and we all left together. Always. Period. And that was before cellphones!

I can’t imagine letting my girlfriend get blackout throw-up drunk and letting her leave with a man we just met. And then shrugging off that she was missing the next morning? No, just no. Those are terrible friends.

Agree. The recent videos show she was in no position to consent. That is when friends take you home. And when real men take you home instead of trying to get some action (technically it is rape).

He was also in no state to consent to anything she did to him.

He is twice her size.

And ALIVE.

Anonymous wrote:Why are there some Indian posters so angry at the white boy calling him cracker, and other white slurs I thought that Indians valued lighter skin and he could be their pathway from green card to citizenship. One could imagine how bad it would be if a black American dated an Indian woman

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I went out with my girlfriends in college we always had a pact to watch each other’s backs and we all left together. Always. Period. And that was before cellphones!

I can’t imagine letting my girlfriend get blackout throw-up drunk and letting her leave with a man we just met. And then shrugging off that she was missing the next morning? No, just no. Those are terrible friends.

+1

And seems like really weird behavior since “friends of the friends“ say they’re all “nice good girls“. Nice good girls would be alarmed if their friend were unable to be found after last being seen with a stranger on a beach at 5 AM. They certainly would not go off on a boat excursion because her friends behavior would be uncharacteristic.

I actually think they were just a little naive. I mean, who immediately thinks their friend is dead in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean at ~8am when they are loading onto the bus? I'm sure by the time (lunch time? IDK) they realized she hadn't woken up and gone to the front desk asking for a key and getting access to her phone, and they couldn't get ahold of her, they started to freak out.

“Just a little naive”???

yes no one has it all figured out while in college as a 20 year old.

Doctors of tomorrow. God help us all.

More like Medicare and Medicaid scammers of tomorrow.

Guess you're just jealous they are learning how to actually help people, while you’re stuck being an expert in complaining.

Oh the irony! Learning to help people? When it really mattered, they didn’t do an effing thing.

+1. In a decade they’ll prob be preying on people scheduling unnecessary surgeries and writing bogus prescriptions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I went out with my girlfriends in college we always had a pact to watch each other’s backs and we all left together. Always. Period. And that was before cellphones!

I can’t imagine letting my girlfriend get blackout throw-up drunk and letting her leave with a man we just met. And then shrugging off that she was missing the next morning? No, just no. Those are terrible friends.

Agree. The recent videos show she was in no position to consent. That is when friends take you home. And when real men take you home instead of trying to get some action (technically it is rape).

He was also in no state to consent to anything she did to him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I went out with my girlfriends in college we always had a pact to watch each other’s backs and we all left together. Always. Period. And that was before cellphones!

I can’t imagine letting my girlfriend get blackout throw-up drunk and letting her leave with a man we just met. And then shrugging off that she was missing the next morning? No, just no. Those are terrible friends.

Agree. The recent videos show she was in no position to consent. That is when friends take you home. And when real men take you home instead of trying to get some action (technically it is rape).

He was also in no state to consent to anything she did to him.

It’s fascinating how quickly some rush to rewrite the narrative when it's convenient. The fact that she’s dead isn’t even enough to stop this revisionist thinking. Consent isn’t about who’s more "out of it," and pretending it is doesn’t just diminish her, it’s an insult to basic decency. Real men protect, they don’t exploit. And anyone using the “he couldn’t consent either” excuse is doing exactly what—making excuses? This isn’t a debate on fairness; it’s about responsibility, and if that’s too hard to grasp, maybe it's time to step back and rethink what being human really means.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I went out with my girlfriends in college we always had a pact to watch each other’s backs and we all left together. Always. Period. And that was before cellphones!

I can’t imagine letting my girlfriend get blackout throw-up drunk and letting her leave with a man we just met. And then shrugging off that she was missing the next morning? No, just no. Those are terrible friends.

+1

And seems like really weird behavior since “friends of the friends“ say they’re all “nice good girls“. Nice good girls would be alarmed if their friend were unable to be found after last being seen with a stranger on a beach at 5 AM. They certainly would not go off on a boat excursion because her friends behavior would be uncharacteristic.

Those girls made some bad decisions and choices. They will live with it for the rest of their lives. We all know that . They didn’t have anything to do with Sudiksha’s disappearance.

They did absolutely nothing to help find her. If they’d all acted more prudently, this incident would never have happened. Many bad choices.

Lies, reporting her missing to resort and contacting her family is not nothing. It was JR and CJ who did nothing.

His failure to alert resort at 10am or before is all the more curious given his claimed heroic actions and risking of his own life. Hmmmm.

There is nothing suspicious about the boys' behavior towards a literal stranger. Their behavior matches their recounting of what happened and all the evidence supports what they said happened AND what the friends said happened.

I bet you think its fine that her very close friends just hopped on a plane the next day after their friend disappeared.

Her friends are either sociopaths or she wasn’t actually their friend at all, she was just a late addition hanger-on to help off-set a group rate.

One of her friends on the trip went to TJ with her.

There are 2,000 kids at TJ, doesn’t mean they’re genuine friends.

You don't think the girl she Venmo'd on Thursday afternoon for the night before at Coco Bongo, who also graduated with her at TJ, and went to Pitt with her, isn't her friend?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I went out with my girlfriends in college we always had a pact to watch each other’s backs and we all left together. Always. Period. And that was before cellphones!

I can’t imagine letting my girlfriend get blackout throw-up drunk and letting her leave with a man we just met. And then shrugging off that she was missing the next morning? No, just no. Those are terrible friends.

+1

And seems like really weird behavior since “friends of the friends“ say they’re all “nice good girls“. Nice good girls would be alarmed if their friend were unable to be found after last being seen with a stranger on a beach at 5 AM. They certainly would not go off on a boat excursion because her friends behavior would be uncharacteristic.

I actually think they were just a little naive. I mean, who immediately thinks their friend is dead in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean at ~8am when they are loading onto the bus? I'm sure by the time (lunch time? IDK) they realized she hadn't woken up and gone to the front desk asking for a key and getting access to her phone, and they couldn't get ahold of her, they started to freak out.

You all are off your rockers. No way in hell am I getting on a bus or boat while my girlfriend is missing. I don’t give a damn how much money we “lose” not going. You all must be the other girls’ parents.

They thought she was with JR. Neither he nor CJ had told them otherwise.

DP. That still does not make what they did OK! I thought she was with a stranger after all those hours? They really thought she would want to miss out on the excursion that was expensive she had already paid for? No it does not add up!

Wonder if JR deliberately returned to the hotel after he figured the group of women had left for their outing? Was it a "I don't want to run into her or the rest of them the morning/same day after" or just happened to wake up around similar time as their expected time for excursion?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I went out with my girlfriends in college we always had a pact to watch each other’s backs and we all left together. Always. Period. And that was before cellphones!

I can’t imagine letting my girlfriend get blackout throw-up drunk and letting her leave with a man we just met. And then shrugging off that she was missing the next morning? No, just no. Those are terrible friends.

+1

And seems like really weird behavior since “friends of the friends“ say they’re all “nice good girls“. Nice good girls would be alarmed if their friend were unable to be found after last being seen with a stranger on a beach at 5 AM. They certainly would not go off on a boat excursion because her friends behavior would be uncharacteristic.

I actually think they were just a little naive. I mean, who immediately thinks their friend is dead in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean at ~8am when they are loading onto the bus? I'm sure by the time (lunch time? IDK) they realized she hadn't woken up and gone to the front desk asking for a key and getting access to her phone, and they couldn't get ahold of her, they started to freak out.

You all are off your rockers. No way in hell am I getting on a bus or boat while my girlfriend is missing. I don’t give a damn how much money we “lose” not going. You all must be the other girls’ parents.

They thought she was with JR. Neither he nor CJ had told them otherwise.

DP. That still does not make what they did OK! I thought she was with a stranger after all those hours? They really thought she would want to miss out on the excursion that was expensive she had already paid for? No it does not add up!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a hearing today re his release per NYP. More details may come out.

Is that why headlines are now back to something like : " DR putting drowning back as a possibility" ? In drowning cases, are bodies usually recovered? Prayers to the families involved.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The boy too is now a victim — of a witch-hunt by racists and trolls and celibate women who binge watch too many hysteric crime thrillers and podcasts.

Because the real tragedy here is the "poor boy" who’s now the victim of a witch-hunt, rather than the actual victims involved. Never mind the circumstances or the investigation—let's shift the narrative to the guy who's under arrest. It's truly remarkable how some can twist things to make a suspect the center of sympathy. Maybe if we spent less time watching crime thrillers and more time paying attention to facts and accountability, we'd be in a better place. But hey, at least you're not the one on trial.

Wrong. Some just understand US constitutional rights and how the US should demand the same for this US citizen.

You cannot seriously be this stupid.

You have no US constitutional rights when you are not in the US. Full stop.

The US cannot and will not demand that a sovereign nation accord rights other than the rights granted by that sovereign nation. Full stop. If Trump/Rubio "demanded" this of another country, they would be laughed out of town.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The boy too is now a victim — of a witch-hunt by racists and trolls and celibate women who binge watch too many hysteric crime thrillers and podcasts.

Because the real tragedy here is the "poor boy" who’s now the victim of a witch-hunt, rather than the actual victims involved. Never mind the circumstances or the investigation—let's shift the narrative to the guy who's under arrest. It's truly remarkable how some can twist things to make a suspect the center of sympathy. Maybe if we spent less time watching crime thrillers and more time paying attention to facts and accountability, we'd be in a better place. But hey, at least you're not the one on trial.

Wrong. Some just understand US constitutional rights and how the US should demand the same for this US citizen.