Anonymous wrote:
+1. just take one of the most famous and worldwide recognizable brand (both the bird design mark alone and the word mark TWITTER) in the world, throw them in the trash and sell your services under X from now on![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
at this point I think that all the various dictators and rich wannabe strong men, MBS, Putin, RW americans like Peter Thiel and others and so on came together, put some money on the pot and had Musk buy and destroy Twitter for them.
Anonymous wrote:Is it even possible to trademark X?
Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately Twitter is cornering the free speech market while all the competitors divide up the censored speech market.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I switched to Threads - and it’s not bad. It Twitter about to become a larger Truth Social?
Just be careful. Threads, like IG itself, seems very loose with privacy. They’ve done stuff like recommend alt accounts to people connected to a primary account because the same WiFi or device id is used.
I don’t love Twitter now, and I have decreased my use a lot, but although it is crazy to say this, I think Musk is probably better with data privacy than Zuck.
Their ToS are the same, so no, Musk is not better than Zuck or vice versa.
Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately Twitter is cornering the free speech market while all the competitors divide up the censored speech market.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I switched to Threads - and it’s not bad. It Twitter about to become a larger Truth Social?
Just be careful. Threads, like IG itself, seems very loose with privacy. They’ve done stuff like recommend alt accounts to people connected to a primary account because the same WiFi or device id is used.
I don’t love Twitter now, and I have decreased my use a lot, but although it is crazy to say this, I think Musk is probably better with data privacy than Zuck.