Breaking: Sources inside the Fulton County Superior Court say the Court is likely to announce denial of Wade's Motion to Exclude Cellphone Data very soon.

Maybe President Trump could hire him to negotiate with Stormy?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidebar: Not everyone gets paid what they deserve... but everyone gets paid what they negotiate.

Of all the arguments presented the one that this guy got paid too more than everyone else just screams he is a better negotiator.

There may be something to the other points but I can't be mad because he handles his business better than some other people do

He was negotiating with the person he was sleeping with, so there's that.
He was also not as qualified as at least one of the other people who was working on this case.

Same deal. That one other person sounds like they are good at criminal law but not good at business.

There are a few other angles to argue but this one just makes me think that Wade has way more moxy.

A pair of golden tinted sneakers for $399? Doesn't sound like they are "worth" that much - but that is the price and that is what a heck of a lot of people paid.

Yeah. Like the fact that he was sleeping with the person he was negotiating with.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidebar: Not everyone gets paid what they deserve... but everyone gets paid what they negotiate.

Of all the arguments presented the one that this guy got paid too more than everyone else just screams he is a better negotiator.

There may be something to the other points but I can't be mad because he handles his business better than some other people do

He was negotiating with the person he was sleeping with, so there's that.
He was also not as qualified as at least one of the other people who was working on this case.

Same deal. That one other person sounds like they are good at criminal law but not good at business.

There are a few other angles to argue but this one just makes me think that Wade has way more moxy.


A pair of golden tinted sneakers for $399? Doesn't sound like they are "worth" that much - but that is the price and that is what a heck of a lot of people paid.

I supposed "moxy" is one way of describing his behavior.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidebar: Not everyone gets paid what they deserve... but everyone gets paid what they negotiate.

Of all the arguments presented the one that this guy got paid too more than everyone else just screams he is a better negotiator.

There may be something to the other points but I can't be mad because he handles his business better than some other people do

He was negotiating with the person he was sleeping with, so there's that.
He was also not as qualified as at least one of the other people who was working on this case.

Same deal. That one other person sounds like they are good at criminal law but not good at business.

There are a few other angles to argue but this one just makes me think that Wade has way more moxy.

A pair of golden tinted sneakers for $399? Doesn't sound like they are "worth" that much - but that is the price and that is what a heck of a lot of people paid.

Anonymous wrote:Sidebar: Not everyone gets paid what they deserve... but everyone gets paid what they negotiate.

Of all the arguments presented the one that this guy got paid too more than everyone else just screams he is a better negotiator.

There may be something to the other points but I can't be mad because he handles his business better than some other people do

He was negotiating with the person he was sleeping with, so there's that.
He was also not as qualified as at least one of the other people who was working on this case.

Sidebar: Not everyone gets paid what they deserve... but everyone gets paid what they negotiate.

Of all the arguments presented the one that this guy got paid too more than everyone else just screams he is a better negotiator.

There may be something to the other points but I can't be mad because he handles his business better than some other people do

Anonymous wrote:When did they go from being professional acquaintances to friends? When did they go from friends to lovers? At what point did the phone calls go from "Hey, can you get some extra binders from Staples?" to "Get some extra binders and some drinks because it's going to be a long night"

Because after people drink together everything is different? Or is it after they hug? Or after they kiss? Or sleep together? Or stop doing any of those things?

A girl I slept with once recommended me for a job years later. Was that wrong of her?

Were you qualified for the job?
Were you sleeping together at the time?
Did she supervise you?
Did she determine your pay and compensate you more than others in the same position?
Did you use that pay to take her on luxury vacations?

When did they go from being professional acquaintances to friends? When did they go from friends to lovers? At what point did the phone calls go from "Hey, can you get some extra binders from Staples?" to "Get some extra binders and some drinks because it's going to be a long night"

Because after people drink together everything is different? Or is it after they hug? Or after they kiss? Or sleep together? Or stop doing any of those things?

A girl I slept with once recommended me for a job years later. Was that wrong of her?

Anonymous wrote: I think someone posted earlier in the thread about digging a hole for others and you falling into it yourself.

If you're referring to Bernegger, I agree. More fines for frivolous complaints coming his way.

I think someone posted earlier in the thread about digging a hole for others and you falling into it yourself.

Anonymous wrote:

The Georgia Ethics Commission has sent notice to Fani Willis that they are reviewing a campaign finance & criminal money laundering complaint filed by Peter Bernegger

She has 30 days to respond and will probably invoke her big black woman card and pretend it's a racial attack

@PeterBernegger
is an expert in a money laundering method called SMURFING which happens when the names of unsuspecting elderly people are used to funnel money to political candidates or organizations.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The Georgia Ethics Commission has sent notice to Fani Willis that they are reviewing a campaign finance & criminal money laundering complaint filed by Peter Bernegger

She has 30 days to respond and will probably invoke her big black woman card and pretend it's a racial attack

@PeterBernegger
is an expert in a money laundering method called SMURFING which happens when the names of unsuspecting elderly people are used to funnel money to political candidates or organizations.

I just googled Peter Bernegger. Wowie! OP, you should be ashamed of yourself for posting that.

If the Ethics Committee find no wrong doing, it will be dismissed.
Meanwhile, they have opened a review.

Earlier this year, Peter Bernegger, a resident of New London, was invited by Republicans to a state Assembly committee to give testimony on voter fraud. Now, he’s been fined more than $2,400 by the Wisconsin Elections Commission for making frivolous complaints.

https://www.wpr.org/politics/man-who-gave-testimony-assembly-committee-2020-election-fined-elections-commission-frivolous-claims

State Capitol Police warn a man over possible stalking behavior towards an elections official.

Peter Bernegger of New London was served with a warning letter last month.

The July 7 letter from Capitol Police Chief David Erwin notified Bernegger that his behavior toward Wisconsin Elections Commission administrator Meagan Wolfe and commission staff “could be interpreted as ‘stalking’ under state law.”

https://whbl.com/2023/08/07/warning-letter-to-man-over-possible-stalking-of-wec-administrator-meagan-wolfe/

UNITED STATES v. BERNEGGER (2020)
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Bernegger was convicted of mail fraud and bank fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 & 1344, in the Northern District of Mississippi and sentenced to terms of imprisonment and supervised release. The trial court also ordered him to pay $1,725,000.00 in restitution and, though it did not set a payment.

Bernegger was convicted of mail fraud and bank fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 & 1344, in the Northern District of Mississippi and sentenced to terms of imprisonment and supervised release. The trial court also ordered him to pay $1,725,000.00 in restitution and, though it did not set a payment schedule, required him to make equal monthly payments towards restitution as a condition of his supervised release. After he completed his prison term (during which he paid $575 towards restitution) and obtained permission to move to Wisconsin, the Eastern District of Wisconsin accepted jurisdiction over his supervised release in December 2018. Four years after Bernegger's release, he had paid no additional restitution.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-7th-circuit/2046782.html

And this one: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-5th-circuit/2018589.html

Breaking:Nathan Wade “made the decisions to hire or fire” employees in Fulton County District Attorney’s Office following Fulton County prosecutor Fani Willis’ election victory in November 2020, multiple sources familiar with the Wade and Willis relationship exclusively told Breitbart News.
The revelation of Wade’s previously unreported position as the former personnel decision-maker for the District Attorney’s Office raises ethical and conflict of interest concerns. It also raises questions about whether Wade and Willis have been forthright about the timeline of their affair.

“Wade is a prosecutor on the Trump case and he selected the office employees,” a source told Breitbart News.

Wade led a transition team of ten to twelve people who interviewed and evaluated current employees to remain in Willis’ newly won office just weeks after she won the election in November, said the sources, who wished to remain anonymous for fear of retribution due to their direct knowledge of the environment inside the District Attorney’s Office, which they characterized as “corrupt.”

Wade, a second source told Breitbart News, was in charge of determining who of the 250 office employees would remain with Willis. Sources described one-on-one interviews behind closed doors with Willis and Wade, who was “too invested to be just a friend” of Willis to hold such a powerful position.

Wade and Willis claim their relationship started in 2022 after Willis launched the probe into former President Donald Trump. But sources say Wade and Willis “obviously” had an ongoing romantic relationship at the time Willis won the election. “There was just something so weird going on,” one source said.
The sources did not initially know who Wade was during the transition process, but they told Breitbart News they questioned why Willis would outsource the transition process to unknown actors. “Why was he a part of the hiring process and making the decisions as to who gets hired and fired when he wasn’t even an employee or authorized to be in the room,” a source questioned.

After the reinterview process, Wade and Willis “started eliminating anybody that was too close and in control” of the office operations, the second source said. Willis, sources asserted, violated the Friends and Family Policy by “hiring friends and family” and hiding it from the county with fungible state and county dollars.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/02/25/exclusive-nathan-wade-led-fani-willis-2020-transition-into-office/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The Georgia Ethics Commission has sent notice to Fani Willis that they are reviewing a campaign finance & criminal money laundering complaint filed by Peter Bernegger

She has 30 days to respond and will probably invoke her big black woman card and pretend it's a racial attack

@PeterBernegger
is an expert in a money laundering method called SMURFING which happens when the names of unsuspecting elderly people are used to funnel money to political candidates or organizations.

I just googled Peter Bernegger. Wowie! OP, you should be ashamed of yourself for posting that.

If the Ethics Committee find no wrong doing, it will be dismissed.
Meanwhile, they have opened a review.