Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich" is a four-part documentary series on Netflix that explores the life and crimes of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, focusing on the stories of his survivors. Released on May 27, 2020, it highlights how Epstein used his wealth and power to exploit young women.

This link has 30sec of ads prior, but shows the 1st part of the series:

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x801l2z

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to think Trump and Epstein were equal partners in this. Trump didn’t think he was in the files, videos, etc. because he was collecting information with Epstein for blackmail, not one of the people being blackmailed. But when Bondi informed him that he was in there in a damning way he did a 180.

Obvious co-conspirators in this global cabal. Trump met his first wife thru Maxwell Sr and current wife thru Epstein and Maxwell’s daughter. His daughter was set up with another global mobster’s closeted gay son by Murdoch. Are you people really this dense to think Trump is a victim or “outsider” in all of this? Epstein, Maxwells, Murdoch, Kushners… this is the apex of Zionism/Mossad power.

Not to mention everyone likes to overlook how Trump is or was bff with Stephen Schwarzman and Jeff Zucker, made a household A-list name on NBC, CNN, Fox News, Howard Stern, The View, Letterman, and Leno for decades. Why? It’s literally the same playbook with Diddy. Famous for no reason…

“Trump is such an outsider shunned by high society” is hilarious propaganda.

How many senators, former presidents, and billionaires were at your and your kids’ weddings? Covered by NY Times and every other elite legacy medium.

I always assumed that those people humored him and attended his events because they’re public spectacles, but they don’t invite him to their own events because they don’t actually consider him a friend.

For the posters attempting to redirect the conversation to victim blaming vs the crimes committed:

You know damn well not all parents are good parents. That’s not a shock to anyone paying attention. But let’s be real—bad parenting isn’t illegal. Neither is poor decision making for a groomed victim.

What is illegal? Rape. Sexual assault. Child trafficking. Coercion. And if you are in a position of public service, so is violating a constitutional oath of public trust.

Why is that so hard to wrap your mind around? That this is the priority? Knowing what was done illegally? Hell, even prior sex offenders have to register and show the general public where they live. Everyone on that “list” who committed a sexual offense should have to do the same.

And yes, there was a Netflix documentary about the Epstein files —watch it. It adds some context for those asking, how?, but it barely scratches the surface.

Why doesn’t any info we have scratch the surface? Because the GOP is sitting on over 300GB of unreleased Epstein files, clenching them like their lives depend on it (maybe they do).

However - at this point, someone needs to pry the grip off with a legal crowbar. The truth doesn’t need another PR campaign. It needs daylight, exposure, accountability, and justice.

Anonymous wrote:

Maybe she’s afraid of ending up actually dead, like Epstein.

at least they admit it

https://bsky.app/profile/acyn.bsky.social/post/3luq5fnesks2d

Sen. Mullin (R-OK) blocking Sen. Gallego (D-AZ) resolution calling for release of the Epstein files: "What we’re simply trying to do is give [Trump] cover"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“Serious question: Do we have evidence of crimes? I know there are some women (girls) speaking out but is there enough to prosecute on? I am worried that the plane logs are all that are in the files and that won't be enough to take these guys down. And for the record, I think Trump is 100% guilty but have a feeling that it will be spun as they were business associates and he did nothing wrong.”

Are you an idiot? Did you sleep through the Maxwell trial and never read any of the highly redacted testimony. I bet there are links on the first few pages of this thread.

I am having a really hard time wrapping my head around the fact that these girls, many of whom recruited one another, continued to return year after year. No one handcuffed these girls and kidnapped them. Out of the supposed 1000s of victims, none thought to notify a trusted adult after maybe the first encounter? I find this unbelievable. In the Epstein documentary, there were two sisters, one sister was an adult at 25 years old, ‘working’ as an artist for Epstein. So, sorry but at 25 years old she needs to be held accountable to some extent. Then she introduces her teenaged sister to creepy Epstein and Ghislaine, and the parents were also on board with sending the young sister out to NM thinking it was a group of kids meeting at his ranch?? Didn’t the parents speak with their daughter while she was in NM? This is all nonsensical. Then the sisters alerted the FBI and the FBI never followed up? And the journalists following the case were threatened with a severed cat’s head in the garden and then Epstein threatened to put a spell on the pregnant journalist. You couldn’t make this up! It’s insane, but again where were the parents in all of this?

Once the files are released and the pedos are jailed maybe Netflix can do a special to get you the irrelevant news you seek.

A 50 year old man trying to have sex with a 25 year old is not a pedophile. The 25 year old woman painted nude pictures of her underaged sisters, so she had photos of her underaged sisters that were presumably stolen by Epstein and Ghislaine. Who paints pictures of their underaged sisters? Where were the parents and why was this allowed? Then Jeffrey requests to meet the underaged sisters and the 25 year old sister and parents agreed this sounded like a fine idea?

I always figured these girls were groomed or families were money and power hungry.

Agree, who tf has nude photos of their siblings? I don’t care if she’s an artist. Go advertise for a nude model or something.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“Serious question: Do we have evidence of crimes? I know there are some women (girls) speaking out but is there enough to prosecute on? I am worried that the plane logs are all that are in the files and that won't be enough to take these guys down. And for the record, I think Trump is 100% guilty but have a feeling that it will be spun as they were business associates and he did nothing wrong.”

Are you an idiot? Did you sleep through the Maxwell trial and never read any of the highly redacted testimony. I bet there are links on the first few pages of this thread.

I am having a really hard time wrapping my head around the fact that these girls, many of whom recruited one another, continued to return year after year. No one handcuffed these girls and kidnapped them. Out of the supposed 1000s of victims, none thought to notify a trusted adult after maybe the first encounter? I find this unbelievable. In the Epstein documentary, there were two sisters, one sister was an adult at 25 years old, ‘working’ as an artist for Epstein. So, sorry but at 25 years old she needs to be held accountable to some extent. Then she introduces her teenaged sister to creepy Epstein and Ghislaine, and the parents were also on board with sending the young sister out to NM thinking it was a group of kids meeting at his ranch?? Didn’t the parents speak with their daughter while she was in NM? This is all nonsensical. Then the sisters alerted the FBI and the FBI never followed up? And the journalists following the case were threatened with a severed cat’s head in the garden and then Epstein threatened to put a spell on the pregnant journalist. You couldn’t make this up! It’s insane, but again where were the parents in all of this?

Once the files are released and the pedos are jailed maybe Netflix can do a special to get you the irrelevant news you seek.

A 50 year old man trying to have sex with a 25 year old is not a pedophile. The 25 year old woman painted nude pictures of her underaged sisters, so she had photos of her underaged sisters that were presumably stolen by Epstein and Ghislaine. Who paints pictures of their underaged sisters? Where were the parents and why was this allowed? Then Jeffrey requests to meet the underaged sisters and the 25 year old sister and parents agreed this sounded like a fine idea?

I always figured these girls were groomed or families were money and power hungry.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump plans to reduce Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentence in exchange for her testimony

I disagree. I think Todd Blanche is down in Florida getting Maxwell to testify that Trump had sex with underage girls in exchange for a lighter sentence.

Let's think about this: Rupert Murdoch's WSJ published the story about Trump's drawing for Epstein's 50th birthday book. And the WSJ published the story about Bondi telling Trump that his name is on the Espstien files. And wasn't it odd that Vance "vacationed" in the UK, and oh, BTW, stopped in for a visit with Murdoch days before the WSJ story about Trump's drawing was published?

The Project 2025 folk no longer need Trump. He's a liability. His crazy tariffs are destroying the world economy. The Humongous Hideous Bill passed, so Trump's utility is over. They want JD Vance as POTUS, the sooner the better.

Epstein is the Project 2025 folks way to get rid of Trump. Watch for it....

Interesting theory, but Blanche has been Trump's personal attorney. He isn't there to undercut Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“Serious question: Do we have evidence of crimes? I know there are some women (girls) speaking out but is there enough to prosecute on? I am worried that the plane logs are all that are in the files and that won't be enough to take these guys down. And for the record, I think Trump is 100% guilty but have a feeling that it will be spun as they were business associates and he did nothing wrong.”

Are you an idiot? Did you sleep through the Maxwell trial and never read any of the highly redacted testimony. I bet there are links on the first few pages of this thread.

I am having a really hard time wrapping my head around the fact that these girls, many of whom recruited one another, continued to return year after year. No one handcuffed these girls and kidnapped them. Out of the supposed 1000s of victims, none thought to notify a trusted adult after maybe the first encounter? I find this unbelievable. In the Epstein documentary, there were two sisters, one sister was an adult at 25 years old, ‘working’ as an artist for Epstein. So, sorry but at 25 years old she needs to be held accountable to some extent. Then she introduces her teenaged sister to creepy Epstein and Ghislaine, and the parents were also on board with sending the young sister out to NM thinking it was a group of kids meeting at his ranch?? Didn’t the parents speak with their daughter while she was in NM? This is all nonsensical. Then the sisters alerted the FBI and the FBI never followed up? And the journalists following the case were threatened with a severed cat’s head in the garden and then Epstein threatened to put a spell on the pregnant journalist. You couldn’t make this up! It’s insane, but again where were the parents in all of this?

Once the files are released and the pedos are jailed maybe Netflix can do a special to get you the irrelevant news you seek.

A 50 year old man trying to have sex with a 25 year old is not a pedophile. The 25 year old woman painted nude pictures of her underaged sisters, so she had photos of her underaged sisters that were presumably stolen by Epstein and Ghislaine. Who paints pictures of their underaged sisters? Where were the parents and why was this allowed? Then Jeffrey requests to meet the underaged sisters and the 25 year old sister and parents agreed this sounded like a fine idea?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump plans to reduce Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentence in exchange for her testimony

I disagree. I think Todd Blanche is down in Florida getting Maxwell to testify that Trump had sex with underage girls in exchange for a lighter sentence.

Let's think about this: Rupert Murdoch's WSJ published the story about Trump's drawing for Epstein's 50th birthday book. And the WSJ published the story about Bondi telling Trump that his name is on the Espstien files. And wasn't it odd that Vance "vacationed" in the UK, and oh, BTW, stopped in for a visit with Murdoch days before the WSJ story about Trump's drawing was published?

The Project 2025 folk no longer need Trump. He's a liability. His crazy tariffs are destroying the world economy. The Humongous Hideous Bill passed, so Trump's utility is over. They want JD Vance as POTUS, the sooner the better.

Epstein is the Project 2025 folks way to get rid of Trump. Watch for it....

isn’t this a bit premature? Wouldn’t they wait until the end of January, 2027, so that Vance could theoretically run twice more?

Unless Dems find someone more smarmy than Vance, Vance would never be e to extend. There is no one smarmier than Vance unless it's Prince Andrew.

I PRAY Democrats find the sleaziest, most evil, unscrupulous monster to run against Vance. Fight fire with fire.

Fight fire with water, or salt, or baking soda. They need a salty, bold and brazen mo faux that will stop the wildfires by smoldering them out with the truth. And wits.

Dems don’t need a monster. They need someone who can salt the earth with facts and snatch the mic with receipts.

Dems shouldn’t out-sleaze him, but they’d better outsmart him. And outpost him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Is it possible that Johnson is on some of those Epstein tapes. He is sweating mighty hard in his attempt to bury the matter.

OMG! He is such a hypocrite that I wouldn't be surprised.

I don’t think he travelled in those circles in the early 00s. He “adopted” a teen aged boy when he was 25 and unmarried. IMO that needs a second look. Why are they no longer in contact?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“Serious question: Do we have evidence of crimes? I know there are some women (girls) speaking out but is there enough to prosecute on? I am worried that the plane logs are all that are in the files and that won't be enough to take these guys down. And for the record, I think Trump is 100% guilty but have a feeling that it will be spun as they were business associates and he did nothing wrong.”

Are you an idiot? Did you sleep through the Maxwell trial and never read any of the highly redacted testimony. I bet there are links on the first few pages of this thread.

I am having a really hard time wrapping my head around the fact that these girls, many of whom recruited one another, continued to return year after year. No one handcuffed these girls and kidnapped them. Out of the supposed 1000s of victims, none thought to notify a trusted adult after maybe the first encounter? I find this unbelievable. In the Epstein documentary, there were two sisters, one sister was an adult at 25 years old, ‘working’ as an artist for Epstein. So, sorry but at 25 years old she needs to be held accountable to some extent. Then she introduces her teenaged sister to creepy Epstein and Ghislaine, and the parents were also on board with sending the young sister out to NM thinking it was a group of kids meeting at his ranch?? Didn’t the parents speak with their daughter while she was in NM? This is all nonsensical. Then the sisters alerted the FBI and the FBI never followed up? And the journalists following the case were threatened with a severed cat’s head in the garden and then Epstein threatened to put a spell on the pregnant journalist. You couldn’t make this up! It’s insane, but again where were the parents in all of this?

Once the files are released and the pedos are jailed maybe Netflix can do a special to get you the irrelevant news you seek.

Anonymous wrote:

“Serious question: Do we have evidence of crimes? I know there are some women (girls) speaking out but is there enough to prosecute on? I am worried that the plane logs are all that are in the files and that won't be enough to take these guys down. And for the record, I think Trump is 100% guilty but have a feeling that it will be spun as they were business associates and he did nothing wrong.”

Are you an idiot? Did you sleep through the Maxwell trial and never read any of the highly redacted testimony. I bet there are links on the first few pages of this thread.

I am having a really hard time wrapping my head around the fact that these girls, many of whom recruited one another, continued to return year after year. No one handcuffed these girls and kidnapped them. Out of the supposed 1000s of victims, none thought to notify a trusted adult after maybe the first encounter? I find this unbelievable. In the Epstein documentary, there were two sisters, one sister was an adult at 25 years old, ‘working’ as an artist for Epstein. So, sorry but at 25 years old she needs to be held accountable to some extent. Then she introduces her teenaged sister to creepy Epstein and Ghislaine, and the parents were also on board with sending the young sister out to NM thinking it was a group of kids meeting at his ranch?? Didn’t the parents speak with their daughter while she was in NM? This is all nonsensical. Then the sisters alerted the FBI and the FBI never followed up? And the journalists following the case were threatened with a severed cat’s head in the garden and then Epstein threatened to put a spell on the pregnant journalist. You couldn’t make this up! It’s insane, but again where were the parents in all of this?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump plans to reduce Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentence in exchange for her testimony

I disagree. I think Todd Blanche is down in Florida getting Maxwell to testify that Trump had sex with underage girls in exchange for a lighter sentence.

Let's think about this: Rupert Murdoch's WSJ published the story about Trump's drawing for Epstein's 50th birthday book. And the WSJ published the story about Bondi telling Trump that his name is on the Espstien files. And wasn't it odd that Vance "vacationed" in the UK, and oh, BTW, stopped in for a visit with Murdoch days before the WSJ story about Trump's drawing was published?

The Project 2025 folk no longer need Trump. He's a liability. His crazy tariffs are destroying the world economy. The Humongous Hideous Bill passed, so Trump's utility is over. They want JD Vance as POTUS, the sooner the better.

Epstein is the Project 2025 folks way to get rid of Trump. Watch for it....

Interesting theory. I can dig it. We can deal with Vance accordingly should the time come. But Trump needs to GTFO. 😤