Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So...that’s your takeaway from these new accusations? That the Washington Post is a terrific conspirator and Roy Moore wasn’t sexually assaulting vulnerable women - and teenagers - repeatedly through the years?

In your opinion, is he a "pedophile" or not?

Anyone?

Let me see, my parents started courting back then. My mother was 15, my father 28. They married when she was 26, right. Score he left fir war, he was in the military. Today they are married over 60 years and thankfully still healthy and happy. Back then this age difference wasn't a big deal. So I'll wait and give this man the same benefit of a doubt I would provide you under these circumstances. It is his word against theirs, I'd like to have a little more than the words of these accusers before I destroy a persons life. I am a woman and I have witnessed lots of crap from women over the years so I am skeptical to say the least. Why now? There were so many opportunities to come forward. Why now?

Good points and questions to ponder.
Looking forward to the responses.

OH! OH! ME! ME! BACK HERE! IN THE BACK! I HAVE A RESPONSE!

Her dad is f-ing gross. This was not, and was never okay. Either way, in the 70s this was illegal. Either way, Roy Moore attempted rape and assault on many of these women which is and was illegal.

The man was banned from a mall. In the 70s.

Surely, *someone* reported him.

They did. Why do you think he was banned?

No copy of that actual report, huh?

Maybe google interviews with people who worked at the mall.

The more sudden talkers we have, the more it appears to be a smear campaign.

Still not one single written report or even a memo. Hmmm.

And now we have the fake signature...
Oops! Who exactly screwed-up, guys?

"Fake signature?"

The only thing different is the 'y' - In 2017 Roy Moore's 'y' is a little more flamboyant. Apart from that it's IDENTICAL. What possible reason would a forger have for replicating a signature almost identically except for the y?



None. If it's a forgery then the forger obviously had to have had a copy of Roy Moore's real signature in order to get every other detail right. So why change the y?

I'll tell you. NO reason. No reason, because it's not a forgery. It's normal for certain aspects of a person's signature to change or get exaggerated over time. Look at Donald Trump's signature, for heaven's sake - it looks like a seismograph, it's not even legible as saying "Donald Trump." Do you seriously think that's what DJT's signature looked like when he was, say 18 years old?



Whoever's telling you "it's obvious it's a forgery" is a moron.

Anonymous wrote:
What sometimes makes harassers stop is running afoul of someone who makes a serious and credible threat.

The title of this thread calls Moore a pedophile. Pedophiles don't stop. He'd be taking flights to Thailand or Dominican Republican or running a non-profit for at-risk kids to get his fix throughout his 50s 60s 70s.

I guess those idiots thought "Bernie Bernstein" would be a good name to use while concocting a fake "east coast elitist liberal reporter" to stir up fake outrage.

I guess with a name like that, maybe Bernie Bernstein is supposed to be Jewish, too. Not like Alabama evangelical fundies. Heavens. Clutch those pearls. He must be the worst of the worst.

Yeah, sure, that'll work.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So...that’s your takeaway from these new accusations? That the Washington Post is a terrific conspirator and Roy Moore wasn’t sexually assaulting vulnerable women - and teenagers - repeatedly through the years?

In your opinion, is he a "pedophile" or not?

Anyone?

Let me see, my parents started courting back then. My mother was 15, my father 28. They married when she was 26, right. Score he left fir war, he was in the military. Today they are married over 60 years and thankfully still healthy and happy. Back then this age difference wasn't a big deal. So I'll wait and give this man the same benefit of a doubt I would provide you under these circumstances. It is his word against theirs, I'd like to have a little more than the words of these accusers before I destroy a persons life. I am a woman and I have witnessed lots of crap from women over the years so I am skeptical to say the least. Why now? There were so many opportunities to come forward. Why now?

Good points and questions to ponder.
Looking forward to the responses.

OH! OH! ME! ME! BACK HERE! IN THE BACK! I HAVE A RESPONSE!

Her dad is f-ing gross. This was not, and was never okay. Either way, in the 70s this was illegal. Either way, Roy Moore attempted rape and assault on many of these women which is and was illegal.

The man was banned from a mall. In the 70s.

Surely, *someone* reported him.

They did. Why do you think he was banned?

No copy of that actual report, huh?

Not to worry Bernie Bernstein and his millions are hot on the case, digging up that state like a turnip field just before the first freeze.

LOL! "Bernie Bernstein" - the stupid Moore supporters who invented this phony "Hi I'm Bernie Bernstein from WaPo and I want to pay you to give me dirt" bullshit couldn't even come up with a name that didn't sound ridiculous.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pedophile?

Sexual assault and stalking aren't a game of semantics.

True. Just the facts. Pedophile or not?

Oh my god, you moron. It's been answered two dozen times. YES HE'S A PEDOPHILE. I don't care if they had pubic hair or not or wherever you pedophile freaks like to draw the lines to make yourselves feel better about your perversions, but most of us are repulsed by the idea of assaulting teens.

His most recent assault was 25 years ago?

That line of reasoning is going to look real dumb when something more recent comes out. I'm sure Bernie Bernstein's phone is ringing off the hook. Four new accusers just today.

What made him suddenly stop 25 years ago?
He found Jesus?

What sometimes makes harassers stop is running afoul of someone who makes a serious and credible threat.

The GOP is cooking up a new way to keep this seat. McConnell, Moore’s and Bannon’s nemesis, is considering having Luther Strange resign, which would trigger a new election for this seat, at least in theory.

What desperate times are these. This election is critically important.


https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/15/roy-moore-republicans-alabama-senate-244961

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So...that’s your takeaway from these new accusations? That the Washington Post is a terrific conspirator and Roy Moore wasn’t sexually assaulting vulnerable women - and teenagers - repeatedly through the years?

In your opinion, is he a "pedophile" or not?

Anyone?

Let me see, my parents started courting back then. My mother was 15, my father 28. They married when she was 26, right. Score he left fir war, he was in the military. Today they are married over 60 years and thankfully still healthy and happy. Back then this age difference wasn't a big deal. So I'll wait and give this man the same benefit of a doubt I would provide you under these circumstances. It is his word against theirs, I'd like to have a little more than the words of these accusers before I destroy a persons life. I am a woman and I have witnessed lots of crap from women over the years so I am skeptical to say the least. Why now? There were so many opportunities to come forward. Why now?

Good points and questions to ponder.
Looking forward to the responses.

OH! OH! ME! ME! BACK HERE! IN THE BACK! I HAVE A RESPONSE!

Her dad is f-ing gross. This was not, and was never okay. Either way, in the 70s this was illegal. Either way, Roy Moore attempted rape and assault on many of these women which is and was illegal.

The man was banned from a mall. In the 70s.

Surely, *someone* reported him.

They did. Why do you think he was banned?

No copy of that actual report, huh?

Maybe google interviews with people who worked at the mall.

The more sudden talkers we have, the more it appears to be a smear campaign.

Still not one single written report or even a memo. Hmmm.

And now we have the fake signature...
Oops! Who exactly screwed-up, guys?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So...that’s your takeaway from these new accusations? That the Washington Post is a terrific conspirator and Roy Moore wasn’t sexually assaulting vulnerable women - and teenagers - repeatedly through the years?

In your opinion, is he a "pedophile" or not?

Anyone?

Let me see, my parents started courting back then. My mother was 15, my father 28. They married when she was 26, right. Score he left fir war, he was in the military. Today they are married over 60 years and thankfully still healthy and happy. Back then this age difference wasn't a big deal. So I'll wait and give this man the same benefit of a doubt I would provide you under these circumstances. It is his word against theirs, I'd like to have a little more than the words of these accusers before I destroy a persons life. I am a woman and I have witnessed lots of crap from women over the years so I am skeptical to say the least. Why now? There were so many opportunities to come forward. Why now?

Good points and questions to ponder.
Looking forward to the responses.

OH! OH! ME! ME! BACK HERE! IN THE BACK! I HAVE A RESPONSE!

Her dad is f-ing gross. This was not, and was never okay. Either way, in the 70s this was illegal. Either way, Roy Moore attempted rape and assault on many of these women which is and was illegal.

The man was banned from a mall. In the 70s.

Surely, *someone* reported him.

They did. Why do you think he was banned?

No copy of that actual report, huh?

Not to worry Bernie Bernstein and his millions are hot on the case, digging up that state like a turnip field just before the first freeze.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So...that’s your takeaway from these new accusations? That the Washington Post is a terrific conspirator and Roy Moore wasn’t sexually assaulting vulnerable women - and teenagers - repeatedly through the years?

In your opinion, is he a "pedophile" or not?

Anyone?

Let me see, my parents started courting back then. My mother was 15, my father 28. They married when she was 26, right. Score he left fir war, he was in the military. Today they are married over 60 years and thankfully still healthy and happy. Back then this age difference wasn't a big deal. So I'll wait and give this man the same benefit of a doubt I would provide you under these circumstances. It is his word against theirs, I'd like to have a little more than the words of these accusers before I destroy a persons life. I am a woman and I have witnessed lots of crap from women over the years so I am skeptical to say the least. Why now? There were so many opportunities to come forward. Why now?

Good points and questions to ponder.
Looking forward to the responses.

OH! OH! ME! ME! BACK HERE! IN THE BACK! I HAVE A RESPONSE!

Her dad is f-ing gross. This was not, and was never okay. Either way, in the 70s this was illegal. Either way, Roy Moore attempted rape and assault on many of these women which is and was illegal.

The man was banned from a mall. In the 70s.

Surely, *someone* reported him.

They did. Why do you think he was banned?

No copy of that actual report, huh?

Maybe google interviews with people who worked at the mall.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So...that’s your takeaway from these new accusations? That the Washington Post is a terrific conspirator and Roy Moore wasn’t sexually assaulting vulnerable women - and teenagers - repeatedly through the years?

In your opinion, is he a "pedophile" or not?

Anyone?

Let me see, my parents started courting back then. My mother was 15, my father 28. They married when she was 26, right. Score he left fir war, he was in the military. Today they are married over 60 years and thankfully still healthy and happy. Back then this age difference wasn't a big deal. So I'll wait and give this man the same benefit of a doubt I would provide you under these circumstances. It is his word against theirs, I'd like to have a little more than the words of these accusers before I destroy a persons life. I am a woman and I have witnessed lots of crap from women over the years so I am skeptical to say the least. Why now? There were so many opportunities to come forward. Why now?

Good points and questions to ponder.
Looking forward to the responses.

OH! OH! ME! ME! BACK HERE! IN THE BACK! I HAVE A RESPONSE!

Her dad is f-ing gross. This was not, and was never okay. Either way, in the 70s this was illegal. Either way, Roy Moore attempted rape and assault on many of these women which is and was illegal.

The man was banned from a mall. In the 70s.

Surely, *someone* reported him.

They did. Why do you think he was banned?

No copy of that actual report, huh?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pedophile?

Sexual assault and stalking aren't a game of semantics.

True. Just the facts. Pedophile or not?

Oh my god, you moron. It's been answered two dozen times. YES HE'S A PEDOPHILE. I don't care if they had pubic hair or not or wherever you pedophile freaks like to draw the lines to make yourselves feel better about your perversions, but most of us are repulsed by the idea of assaulting teens.

His most recent assault was 25 years ago?

That line of reasoning is going to look real dumb when something more recent comes out. I'm sure Bernie Bernstein's phone is ringing off the hook. Four new accusers just today.

What made him suddenly stop 25 years ago?
He found Jesus?

Anonymous wrote:Roy Moore just tweeted:


Dear Mitch McConnell,

Bring. It. On.

How apropos: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bring_It_On_(film_series)

A high school cheerleading reference!

Roy Moore just tweeted:


Dear Mitch McConnell,

Bring. It. On.

Anonymous wrote:As predicted much, much earlier in this thread, more are stepping forward. Too bad, so sad for all the perv apologists here.

And it’s only been a week since the first one stepped forward.

I’m having a hard time grasping what the apologists gain with Moore. The GOP doesn’t want him, he’s a crappy politician, and worst of all this is precisely the sort of thing that undermines the moral authority of Christianity. I think trying to hide behind church support (and lying even about that) is almost as bad as preying on young girls.

Adding to their weird support for Trump, this affair makes the whole evangelical faction look skeevy. What is up with those people?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As predicted much, much earlier in this thread, more are stepping forward. Too bad, so sad for all the perv apologists here.

Normal people would back down, but his staunchest defenders are really doubling down on supporting a child sex assaulter. This is the hill the GOP faithful want to die on. Molesting teens.

Party over pedophilia. Your new GOP.

That will be a bumper sticker