Anonymous
07/24/2025 11:46
Subject: Epstein Files
isn’t this a bit premature? Wouldn’t they wait until the end of January, 2027, so that Vance could theoretically run twice more?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump plans to reduce Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentence in exchange for her testimony
I disagree. I think Todd Blanche is down in Florida getting Maxwell to testify that Trump had sex with underage girls in exchange for a lighter sentence.
Let's think about this: Rupert Murdoch's WSJ published the story about Trump's drawing for Epstein's 50th birthday book. And the WSJ published the story about Bondi telling Trump that his name is on the Espstien files. And wasn't it odd that Vance "vacationed" in the UK, and oh, BTW, stopped in for a visit with Murdoch days before the WSJ story about Trump's drawing was published?
The Project 2025 folk no longer need Trump. He's a liability. His crazy tariffs are destroying the world economy. The Humongous Hideous Bill passed, so Trump's utility is over. They want JD Vance as POTUS, the sooner the better.
Epstein is the Project 2025 folks way to get rid of Trump. Watch for it....
Anonymous
07/24/2025 11:30
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wonder how quick dcum will drop this witch hunt when they find out all those on the 'list" have a D behind their name?
We Dems have consistently said that we do not care if Dem pedophiles are named.
Right? Where does maga get that dems don’t want it released? I don’t know one saying this.
Trump and MAGA's traditional playbook is failing this time.
Anonymous
07/24/2025 11:29
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wonder how quick dcum will drop this witch hunt when they find out all those on the 'list" have a D behind their name?
We Dems have consistently said that we do not care if Dem pedophiles are named.
Right? Where does maga get that dems don’t want it released? I don’t know one saying this.
MAGA assumes everyone is a craven partisan like they are.
Anonymous
07/24/2025 11:27
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wonder how quick dcum will drop this witch hunt when they find out all those on the 'list" have a D behind their name?
We Dems have consistently said that we do not care if Dem pedophiles are named.
Right? Where does maga get that dems don’t want it released? I don’t know one saying this.
Anonymous
07/24/2025 11:27
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Trump plans to reduce Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentence in exchange for her testimony
If I were her attorney this would have to be fine before she testifies because Trump has no credibility. Also. She is smart enough to claim the fifth unless she is pardoned prior to her testimony.
If she does testify then she should be hooked up to a polygraph machine while testifying!
Anonymous
07/24/2025 11:26
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Trump plans to reduce Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentence in exchange for her testimony
I disagree. I think Todd Blanche is down in Florida getting Maxwell to testify that Trump had sex with underage girls in exchange for a lighter sentence.
Let's think about this: Rupert Murdoch's WSJ published the story about Trump's drawing for Epstein's 50th birthday book. And the WSJ published the story about Bondi telling Trump that his name is on the Espstien files. And wasn't it odd that Vance "vacationed" in the UK, and oh, BTW, stopped in for a visit with Murdoch days before the WSJ story about Trump's drawing was published?
The Project 2025 folk no longer need Trump. He's a liability. His crazy tariffs are destroying the world economy. The Humongous Hideous Bill passed, so Trump's utility is over. They want JD Vance as POTUS, the sooner the better.
Epstein is the Project 2025 folks way to get rid of Trump. Watch for it....
Anonymous
07/24/2025 11:24
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:What are the chances that Ivanka was peddled for these men?
No. She was exclusively for her father.
Anonymous
07/24/2025 11:20
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wonder how quick dcum will drop this witch hunt when they find out all those on the 'list" have a D behind their name?
I don't think you have a reading on the temperature at all. If there are Democrats on the list, so be it. Let them suffer the consequences. The difference is that there isn't a slavish devotion to a cult leader.
Exactly. Bring it on. Expose them all. They deserve to be publicly shamed and socially and professionally ruined. Give them fair trials and throw them in prison forever if they’re guilty. ALL of them. No normal person defends these crimes and criminals.
Serious question: Do we have evidence of crimes? I know there are some women (girls) speaking out but is there enough to prosecute on? I am worried that the plane logs are all that are in the files and that won't be enough to take these guys down. And for the record, I think Trump is 100% guilty but have a feeling that it will be spun as they were business associates and he did nothing wrong.
Yes. It’s a crime to have sex with minors. Rape is a crime. Child sex abuse is a crime. Human trafficking is a crime.
There’s been a ton of evidence about all of these crimes and all of these criminals for years. The problem is that this criminal organization found a criminal state AG in Bondi to make it go away. And now she’s been elevated even higher.
We’ve known about this for at LEAST a decade. But who knew there were so many sick and disturbed people who would participate in a cover up.
Anonymous
07/24/2025 11:17
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wonder how quick dcum will drop this witch hunt when they find out all those on the 'list" have a D behind their name?
Truly couldn’t care less. Out with every single one of them.
All the Democrats who participated in Epstein's pedophilia must be jailed. Along with ALL the Republicans who participated, including Trump.
MAGA agrees with me on this.
Anonymous
Anonymous
07/24/2025 11:10
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The proper term is Ephebophilia. Ephebophilia is the primary sexual interest in mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19, and showing Tanner stages 4 to 5 of physical development.
Having sex with someone under 18 is ILLEGAL. It doesn't matter if they LOOK over 18. No getting around it by claiming, "I didn't ask." This is why consent is so important.
Consent is not what matters. Consent is not a defense against statutory rape.
PP here. My bad, I meant that the Johns can't claim they didn't know girls were under 18 because they looked older.
It is also a strict liability crime. Meaning that if that young person gives well-made fake ID that is not a defense either.
Anonymous
Anonymous
07/24/2025 11:05
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
I don't buy it - Epstein loved to surround himself with the rich and powerful. At the time all this was going on, Mike Johnson was a nobody.
So was Epstein at one time. They can make you rich and powerful if they think that you might be useful.
Anonymous
07/24/2025 11:03
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The lesson of Watergate ( and all of the subsequent "gate" scandals) is that it is the coverup that gets you every time. Why are politicians so stupid!?
What’s crazy is that right now watergate would barely make the news cycle if it happened today. Nobody would care.
That's a fantastic cartoon, but unfortunately, it's not even satire. It's real life.
Anonymous
07/24/2025 10:59
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Wonder how quick dcum will drop this witch hunt when they find out all those on the 'list" have a D behind their name?
We Dems have consistently said that we do not care if Dem pedophiles are named.