Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering how every other social media platform imposes far left values on users, I’m perfectly fine with Twitter favoring moderates and conservatives. I’m a Democrat, but I don’t agree with the hard left Dems have taken on social issues. It’s nice not to have to refer to men by female pronouns and to be able to say men in women’s sports are cheats. These weren’t controversial positions until 30 seconds ago when the DNC started taking money from the Pritzkers and Rothblatt.

I think this is a really dumb take, as you CHOOSE who you follow on most social media. And then you get recommendations, based on YOUR CHOICES. Or do you not know how modern social media platforms work?

I think pp is referring to the FACT that referring to a man who claims to be a woman as an actual MAN could get you banned on Twitter and other social media just a year ago.

Unless someone is running up to you and sticking their naked genitalia in your face, what someone has between their legs is absolutely none of your business. Neither is what they do in a bedroom with another consenting adult.

That’s just your unwashed opinion and no one should be forced to defer to it.

So it's your opinion that what a stranger has under their clothes between their legs is your business to know, and what a stranger does in a bedroom with another consenting adult is your business.
Wow, how intrusive and authoritarian. You're really something.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering how every other social media platform imposes far left values on users, I’m perfectly fine with Twitter favoring moderates and conservatives. I’m a Democrat, but I don’t agree with the hard left Dems have taken on social issues. It’s nice not to have to refer to men by female pronouns and to be able to say men in women’s sports are cheats. These weren’t controversial positions until 30 seconds ago when the DNC started taking money from the Pritzkers and Rothblatt.

I think this is a really dumb take, as you CHOOSE who you follow on most social media. And then you get recommendations, based on YOUR CHOICES. Or do you not know how modern social media platforms work?

I think pp is referring to the FACT that referring to a man who claims to be a woman as an actual MAN could get you banned on Twitter and other social media just a year ago.

Already two threads derailed and locked in the last 2 days, and this transwoman-obsessed loon still hasn't learned and is about to get this one locked, too.

That’s because this site is moderated the way the old Twitter used to be. You better spend all your time here from now on because more and more social media platforms are lifting the ridiculous censorship and letting people speak the truth. No one owes you affirmation of your preferred lies.

Except, you don't speak the truth. You say ludicrous things like "vaccines killed millions" and "The people I know of who oppose drag shows are feminists" as if the Proud Boys who show up to violently disrupt drag shows are feminists. Or accusing anyone with a penis or XX chromosome of being a predator and a rapist. Those are simply not truths.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering how every other social media platform imposes far left values on users, I’m perfectly fine with Twitter favoring moderates and conservatives. I’m a Democrat, but I don’t agree with the hard left Dems have taken on social issues. It’s nice not to have to refer to men by female pronouns and to be able to say men in women’s sports are cheats. These weren’t controversial positions until 30 seconds ago when the DNC started taking money from the Pritzkers and Rothblatt.

I think this is a really dumb take, as you CHOOSE who you follow on most social media. And then you get recommendations, based on YOUR CHOICES. Or do you not know how modern social media platforms work?

Go post on Instagram or Facebook the simple undeniable truth that Dylan Mulvaney is a biological male and see how long you’re still allowed to post. I don’t know if you’re lying or just dense about the far left infiltration social media moderation. Twitter is now the only mainstream platform where anyone who isn’t vomiting DSA slogans is allowed to breathe. Pre-Elon Musk, Twitter was the worst platform, with an army of trans moderators suppressing any fact that was inconvenient to their propaganda.

I won’t be dictated to by either right wing nutjobs or leftwing nutjobs. Both this nation’s extremes are insane.

Oh please. I was permanently suspended without warning from Twitter for pointing out that his checkmark program would lead to impersonation and abuse. And as it turned out, I was 100% right. And I still haven't been reinstated. I do not want to hear one damn thing about Twitter and "free speech." Utter and complete nonsense.

Oh, well. That leaves about 100 other social media platforms for you to hang out on whining about Twitter. Leave Twitter for those who actually like it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering how every other social media platform imposes far left values on users, I’m perfectly fine with Twitter favoring moderates and conservatives. I’m a Democrat, but I don’t agree with the hard left Dems have taken on social issues. It’s nice not to have to refer to men by female pronouns and to be able to say men in women’s sports are cheats. These weren’t controversial positions until 30 seconds ago when the DNC started taking money from the Pritzkers and Rothblatt.

I think this is a really dumb take, as you CHOOSE who you follow on most social media. And then you get recommendations, based on YOUR CHOICES. Or do you not know how modern social media platforms work?

I think pp is referring to the FACT that referring to a man who claims to be a woman as an actual MAN could get you banned on Twitter and other social media just a year ago.

Unless someone is running up to you and sticking their naked genitalia in your face, what someone has between their legs is absolutely none of your business. Neither is what they do in a bedroom with another consenting adult.

That’s just your unwashed opinion and no one should be forced to defer to it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering how every other social media platform imposes far left values on users, I’m perfectly fine with Twitter favoring moderates and conservatives. I’m a Democrat, but I don’t agree with the hard left Dems have taken on social issues. It’s nice not to have to refer to men by female pronouns and to be able to say men in women’s sports are cheats. These weren’t controversial positions until 30 seconds ago when the DNC started taking money from the Pritzkers and Rothblatt.

I think this is a really dumb take, as you CHOOSE who you follow on most social media. And then you get recommendations, based on YOUR CHOICES. Or do you not know how modern social media platforms work?

Go post on Instagram or Facebook the simple undeniable truth that Dylan Mulvaney is a biological male and see how long you’re still allowed to post. I don’t know if you’re lying or just dense about the far left infiltration social media moderation. Twitter is now the only mainstream platform where anyone who isn’t vomiting DSA slogans is allowed to breathe. Pre-Elon Musk, Twitter was the worst platform, with an army of trans moderators suppressing any fact that was inconvenient to their propaganda.

I won’t be dictated to by either right wing nutjobs or leftwing nutjobs. Both this nation’s extremes are insane.

Oh please. I was permanently suspended without warning from Twitter for pointing out that his checkmark program would lead to impersonation and abuse. And as it turned out, I was 100% right. And I still haven't been reinstated. I do not want to hear one damn thing about Twitter and "free speech." Utter and complete nonsense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering how every other social media platform imposes far left values on users, I’m perfectly fine with Twitter favoring moderates and conservatives. I’m a Democrat, but I don’t agree with the hard left Dems have taken on social issues. It’s nice not to have to refer to men by female pronouns and to be able to say men in women’s sports are cheats. These weren’t controversial positions until 30 seconds ago when the DNC started taking money from the Pritzkers and Rothblatt.

I think this is a really dumb take, as you CHOOSE who you follow on most social media. And then you get recommendations, based on YOUR CHOICES. Or do you not know how modern social media platforms work?

I think pp is referring to the FACT that referring to a man who claims to be a woman as an actual MAN could get you banned on Twitter and other social media just a year ago.

Already two threads derailed and locked in the last 2 days, and this transwoman-obsessed loon still hasn't learned and is about to get this one locked, too.

That’s because this site is moderated the way the old Twitter used to be. You better spend all your time here from now on because more and more social media platforms are lifting the ridiculous censorship and letting people speak the truth. No one owes you affirmation of your preferred lies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering how every other social media platform imposes far left values on users, I’m perfectly fine with Twitter favoring moderates and conservatives. I’m a Democrat, but I don’t agree with the hard left Dems have taken on social issues. It’s nice not to have to refer to men by female pronouns and to be able to say men in women’s sports are cheats. These weren’t controversial positions until 30 seconds ago when the DNC started taking money from the Pritzkers and Rothblatt.

I think this is a really dumb take, as you CHOOSE who you follow on most social media. And then you get recommendations, based on YOUR CHOICES. Or do you not know how modern social media platforms work?

I think pp is referring to the FACT that referring to a man who claims to be a woman as an actual MAN could get you banned on Twitter and other social media just a year ago.

Exactly. It’s insane that far left whiners think it’s a civil rights violation that they can’t misuse social media platforms to silence and attack their political foes anymore. The new Twitter is great. There are a bunch of people saying all kinds of things I disagree with and they’re allowed to speak, as it should be in a democracy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering how every other social media platform imposes far left values on users, I’m perfectly fine with Twitter favoring moderates and conservatives. I’m a Democrat, but I don’t agree with the hard left Dems have taken on social issues. It’s nice not to have to refer to men by female pronouns and to be able to say men in women’s sports are cheats. These weren’t controversial positions until 30 seconds ago when the DNC started taking money from the Pritzkers and Rothblatt.

I think this is a really dumb take, as you CHOOSE who you follow on most social media. And then you get recommendations, based on YOUR CHOICES. Or do you not know how modern social media platforms work?

I think pp is referring to the FACT that referring to a man who claims to be a woman as an actual MAN could get you banned on Twitter and other social media just a year ago.

Already two threads derailed and locked in the last 2 days, and this transwoman-obsessed loon still hasn't learned and is about to get this one locked, too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering how every other social media platform imposes far left values on users, I’m perfectly fine with Twitter favoring moderates and conservatives. I’m a Democrat, but I don’t agree with the hard left Dems have taken on social issues. It’s nice not to have to refer to men by female pronouns and to be able to say men in women’s sports are cheats. These weren’t controversial positions until 30 seconds ago when the DNC started taking money from the Pritzkers and Rothblatt.

I think this is a really dumb take, as you CHOOSE who you follow on most social media. And then you get recommendations, based on YOUR CHOICES. Or do you not know how modern social media platforms work?

Go post on Instagram or Facebook the simple undeniable truth that Dylan Mulvaney is a biological male and see how long you’re still allowed to post. I don’t know if you’re lying or just dense about the far left infiltration social media moderation. Twitter is now the only mainstream platform where anyone who isn’t vomiting DSA slogans is allowed to breathe. Pre-Elon Musk, Twitter was the worst platform, with an army of trans moderators suppressing any fact that was inconvenient to their propaganda.

I won’t be dictated to by either right wing nutjobs or leftwing nutjobs. Both this nation’s extremes are insane.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering how every other social media platform imposes far left values on users, I’m perfectly fine with Twitter favoring moderates and conservatives. I’m a Democrat, but I don’t agree with the hard left Dems have taken on social issues. It’s nice not to have to refer to men by female pronouns and to be able to say men in women’s sports are cheats. These weren’t controversial positions until 30 seconds ago when the DNC started taking money from the Pritzkers and Rothblatt.

I think this is a really dumb take, as you CHOOSE who you follow on most social media. And then you get recommendations, based on YOUR CHOICES. Or do you not know how modern social media platforms work?

I think pp is referring to the FACT that referring to a man who claims to be a woman as an actual MAN could get you banned on Twitter and other social media just a year ago.

Unless someone is running up to you and sticking their naked genitalia in your face, what someone has between their legs is absolutely none of your business. Neither is what they do in a bedroom with another consenting adult.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering how every other social media platform imposes far left values on users, I’m perfectly fine with Twitter favoring moderates and conservatives. I’m a Democrat, but I don’t agree with the hard left Dems have taken on social issues. It’s nice not to have to refer to men by female pronouns and to be able to say men in women’s sports are cheats. These weren’t controversial positions until 30 seconds ago when the DNC started taking money from the Pritzkers and Rothblatt.

I think this is a really dumb take, as you CHOOSE who you follow on most social media. And then you get recommendations, based on YOUR CHOICES. Or do you not know how modern social media platforms work?

I think pp is referring to the FACT that referring to a man who claims to be a woman as an actual MAN could get you banned on Twitter and other social media just a year ago.

That may be so, but why are you making personal references and attacks on anyone's gender in the first place?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering how every other social media platform imposes far left values on users, I’m perfectly fine with Twitter favoring moderates and conservatives. I’m a Democrat, but I don’t agree with the hard left Dems have taken on social issues. It’s nice not to have to refer to men by female pronouns and to be able to say men in women’s sports are cheats. These weren’t controversial positions until 30 seconds ago when the DNC started taking money from the Pritzkers and Rothblatt.

As a maga Republican all I can say is ditto!

hail trump!

Nice troll, but PP isn’t wrong. 2008 Obama would be a transphobic white supremacist by the standards of today’s blue haired overly woke scolds who seem to have an outsized influence in the Democratic Party.

-Lifelong Democrat Who Will Never Vote Trump But Is Tired of the BS Too

Hold up. These "blue haired scolds" are what? Elected Democrats? Nope. Unelected government bureaucrats? Nope. Woke corporate CEOs? Nope. They're dippy 15 year old kids who think they know more about the world than they actually do. Along with some of them being bots and fake accounts with an agenda. And how do they get all this outsized power? Again, bots and fake accounts, for one.

Bots and fake accounts are one of the biggest problems in social media. And, they do have an agenda. That agenda may just be pure greed, driving clicks, views, whatever, for ad revenue, or more nefarious, with one big motivation being to polarize and divide America.

My advice to people is, that until social media companies get the rampant mess under control, to not believe anything they see on social media, without first doing some critical thinking and checking reputable sources of information.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering how every other social media platform imposes far left values on users, I’m perfectly fine with Twitter favoring moderates and conservatives. I’m a Democrat, but I don’t agree with the hard left Dems have taken on social issues. It’s nice not to have to refer to men by female pronouns and to be able to say men in women’s sports are cheats. These weren’t controversial positions until 30 seconds ago when the DNC started taking money from the Pritzkers and Rothblatt.

I think this is a really dumb take, as you CHOOSE who you follow on most social media. And then you get recommendations, based on YOUR CHOICES. Or do you not know how modern social media platforms work?

I think pp is referring to the FACT that referring to a man who claims to be a woman as an actual MAN could get you banned on Twitter and other social media just a year ago.

Anonymous wrote:Considering how every other social media platform imposes far left values on users, I’m perfectly fine with Twitter favoring moderates and conservatives. I’m a Democrat, but I don’t agree with the hard left Dems have taken on social issues. It’s nice not to have to refer to men by female pronouns and to be able to say men in women’s sports are cheats. These weren’t controversial positions until 30 seconds ago when the DNC started taking money from the Pritzkers and Rothblatt.

I think this is a really dumb take, as you CHOOSE who you follow on most social media. And then you get recommendations, based on YOUR CHOICES. Or do you not know how modern social media platforms work?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Considering how every other social media platform imposes far left values on users, I’m perfectly fine with Twitter favoring moderates and conservatives. I’m a Democrat, but I don’t agree with the hard left Dems have taken on social issues. It’s nice not to have to refer to men by female pronouns and to be able to say men in women’s sports are cheats. These weren’t controversial positions until 30 seconds ago when the DNC started taking money from the Pritzkers and Rothblatt.

As a maga Republican all I can say is ditto!

hail trump!

Nice troll, but PP isn’t wrong. 2008 Obama would be a transphobic white supremacist by the standards of today’s blue haired overly woke scolds who seem to have an outsized influence in the Democratic Party.

-Lifelong Democrat Who Will Never Vote Trump But Is Tired of the BS Too