Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Is it okay to let your 17-year-old read the court documents?”
I do not mind talking to my child about sex or sexual abuse, but I did not show the court documents to my child because I, who am an adult, felt very disgusted reading them since I could not stop thinking that this was a man in his late 30s/40s AND a teacher talking with a child/student about sex.
For me, it was disturbing and gross that a teacher fantasized with a child/student and would give them a vibrator as a graduation present. To me, it was clear that he wanted to take advantage of his students. I rather explain to my child about manipulation and control rather than reading the sexual communications.
I would only consider reading the court documents as an example within a class about sexual abuse so that the focus is on manipulation and control. I would only share it with a teenager if I knew that the teenager could be at-risk.
I think that the court documents are more for parents, especially those who do not see it as a crime. Would you be OK with a teacher to fantasize with your child? Give them sexual toys? Groom them? Would you be OK with your child to lose their virginity with a teacher?
To me, it’s disgusting and disturbing. To me, he was a pedophile and predator and it upsets me that he got away with it for so long.
I agree with all of this, except the court documents are for the judge, not "for the parents".
They are for the public.
No. They are for the court but they are made available to the public. How do you not understand this?
DP, but your combative tone is bizarre here. If they are only for the court/judge, there is zero need for them to be made public. If they are made public, it is because there has been a state or local determination based on law that they are beneficial to the public. They are very clearly beneficial to any member of the public who wants to protect the vulnerable in their community, not just parents.
Anonymous wrote:
16 year olds should not be tried as adult.
Anonymous wrote:
Imbalance of power as in one is male and the other one is female? In a society where there is imbalance between the genders? And where men write the laws and are in power?
I wonder how many moms are OK with their children having sex at 16 vs. how many fathers are OK with their children having sex at 16. How about your daughters having sex at 16 vs your sons having sex at 16?
Anonymous wrote:But isn’t MCPS funded with our taxes? Can we not lobby? Can we not vote out representatives? Can the state congress not mandate the Dept. of the education to do more and assign a budget? Can we not protest?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But isn’t MCPS funded with our taxes? Can we not lobby? Can we not vote out representatives? Can the state congress not mandate the Dept. of the education to do more and assign a budget? Can we not protest?
+1000 Are there well connected parents at Whitman that like to lobby for an independent IG for employee misconduct and sexual abuse within MCPS. MCPS’s approach to not respond when teachers/coaches are violating the Employee Code of Conduct gives predators free reign to work in the school system. Even worse is when MCPS does their own investigations of sexual abuse and assault BEFORE the police.
MCPS and the Board (who both are advised by the MCPS General Counsel Office) has no neutral third party or mechanism to investigate employee misconduct. Their methodology anytime a complaint from the public is filed is to circle the wagons around their employee. Case history of MCPS child predators are riddled with examples of MCPS knowing of complaints of predatory behavior before the police arrest for sexual abuse occurs.
The Employee Code of Conduct was written to protect children from abuse by people who work for MCPS. It’s negligent to knowingly not enforce it.
Anonymous wrote:But isn’t MCPS funded with our taxes? Can we not lobby? Can we not vote out representatives? Can the state congress not mandate the Dept. of the education to do more and assign a budget? Can we not protest?
Anonymous wrote:But isn’t MCPS funded with our taxes? Can we not lobby? Can we not vote out representatives? Can the state congress not mandate the Dept. of the education to do more and assign a budget? Can we not protest?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Who decided the age of consent and based on what?
Psychologists, health professionals, social workers? research studies? men?
The brain doesn’t fully develop until we are 25. You can not consent something you do not understand. Age is not enough to determine whether a person can consent.
16 year olds should not be tried as adult.
16 should be able to consent if there is no imbalance of power.
18 year olds should be able to alcohol low in alcohol content, 21 for liquor.
And we need to treat mental health problems better.
Imbalance of power as in one is male and the other one is female? In a society where there is imbalance between the genders? And where men write the laws and are in power?
I wonder how many moms are OK with their children having sex at 16 vs. how many fathers are OK with their children having sex at 16. How about your daughters having sex at 16 vs your sons having sex at 16?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Who decided the age of consent and based on what?
Psychologists, health professionals, social workers? research studies? men?
The brain doesn’t fully develop until we are 25. You can not consent something you do not understand. Age is not enough to determine whether a person can consent.
16 year olds should not be tried as adult.
16 should be able to consent if there is no imbalance of power.
18 year olds should be able to alcohol low in alcohol content, 21 for liquor.
And we need to treat mental health problems better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Who decided the age of consent and based on what?
Psychologists, health professionals, social workers? research studies? men?
The brain doesn’t fully develop until we are 25. You can not consent something you do not understand. Age is not enough to determine whether a person can consent.
16 year olds should not be tried as adult.
16 should be able to consent if there is no imbalance of power.
18 year olds should be able to alcohol low in alcohol content, 21 for liquor.
And we need to treat mental health problems better.
Imbalance of power as in one is male and the other one is female? In a society where there is imbalance between the genders? And where men write the laws and are in power?
I wonder how many moms are OK with their children having sex at 16 vs. how many fathers are OK with their children having sex at 16. How about your daughters having sex at 16 vs your sons having sex at 16?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who decided the age of consent and based on what?
Psychologists, health professionals, social workers? research studies? men?
The brain doesn’t fully develop until we are 25 and we are not allowed to drink alcohol until we are 21.
The current age of consent is outdated and arbitrary, it doesn’t consider personal characteristics.
You can not consent something you do not understand. Age is not enough to determine whether a person can consent.
There is no excuse for a 30/40 man to date young girls instead of women his age who can consent. The only people sexually attracted to minors are pedophiles.
We have to draw the line somewhere. If you want to raise the age of consent, then should we raise the age to vote also? How about the age to hold a full-time job or enlist in the military? Or to be charged as an adult for a crime? All those require the ability to make important decisions.
If 16 year olds can be charged as an adult for homicide, can't they also decide about having sex?
I am not understanding your point.
Are you saying that you agree that people should be able to consent at 16 because they can be tried as an adult for homicide at 16? While also agreeing that a person should not drink alcohol until they are 21?
Or are you saying that those who lobbied to raise the age of drinking alcohol were more effective? And we need to be as effective lobbying for measures to prevent sexual abuse?
Sexual abuse is also a mental health problem, so we need to do more for mental health.
We need to force congress to protect our children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who decided the age of consent and based on what?
Psychologists, health professionals, social workers? research studies? men?
The brain doesn’t fully develop until we are 25 and we are not allowed to drink alcohol until we are 21.
The current age of consent is outdated and arbitrary, it doesn’t consider personal characteristics.
You can not consent something you do not understand. Age is not enough to determine whether a person can consent.
There is no excuse for a 30/40 man to date young girls instead of women his age who can consent. The only people sexually attracted to minors are pedophiles.
We have to draw the line somewhere. If you want to raise the age of consent, then should we raise the age to vote also? How about the age to hold a full-time job or enlist in the military? Or to be charged as an adult for a crime? All those require the ability to make important decisions.
If 16 year olds can be charged as an adult for homicide, can't they also decide about having sex?
I am not understanding your point.
Are you saying that you agree that people should be able to consent at 16 because they can be tried as an adult for homicide at 16? While also agreeing that a person should not drink alcohol until they are 21?
Or are you saying that those who lobbied to raise the age of drinking alcohol were more effective? And we need to be as effective lobbying for measures to prevent sexual abuse?
Sexual abuse is also a mental health problem, so we need to do more for mental health.
We need to force congress to protect our children.[/
16 year olds should not be tried as adult.
16 should be able to consent if there is no imbalance of power.
18 year olds should be able to alcohol low in alcohol content, 21 for liquor.
And we need to treat mental health problems better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He's the Head Coach and still on the Whitman website as of right now
Kirk Shipley
![]()
Kirk Shipley is an appropriate name for a dbag pedo. These losers are glorified Phys ed staff.
Anonymous wrote:He's the Head Coach and still on the Whitman website as of right now
Kirk Shipley
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who decided the age of consent and based on what?
Psychologists, health professionals, social workers? research studies? men?
The brain doesn’t fully develop until we are 25 and we are not allowed to drink alcohol until we are 21.
The current age of consent is outdated and arbitrary, it doesn’t consider personal characteristics.
You can not consent something you do not understand. Age is not enough to determine whether a person can consent.
There is no excuse for a 30/40 man to date young girls instead of women his age who can consent. The only people sexually attracted to minors are pedophiles.
We have to draw the line somewhere. If you want to raise the age of consent, then should we raise the age to vote also? How about the age to hold a full-time job or enlist in the military? Or to be charged as an adult for a crime? All those require the ability to make important decisions.
If 16 year olds can be charged as an adult for homicide, can't they also decide about having sex?