Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With 50% marriages ending in divorce, you cut your dating pool by half with this approach. If after age 35, you effectively cut it by 70-80%
Nah. That statistic includes the same person getting divorced over and over again. Also if you control for income and education level it’s lower too.
Yeah it’s not relevant for dcum
T20 legacy types that come from solid ses and maintain the ses level of their parents have minuscule divorce rates
Divorce really happens when:
1. Money problems
2. People who struggle with the marshmallow test/delayed gratification
If your mom and dad are solid ses from top schools and you are as well, your chances of divorce are fractional
Anonymous wrote:Is this an OK standard to have?
My fiance told me he would never date a woman with divorced parents. He said it normalizes divorce, they grow up in a home where marriage is temporary, and in a lot of cases they no longer have a father. I think I agree with him, but it seems kind of mean to dismiss people based on their parents' actions.
Anonymous wrote:Soon there won't be anyone to marry as they are all not financially independent, coming from intact families, or just having much experience in a family environment or this country. Make whatever criteria you want. Just don't be sad when you don't have kids because you waited too long or don't have a partner who shares your interests because of a resume.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Majority of divorced people come here and post about all the red flags they didn't see or chose to avoid.
It doesn't mean their parents were divorced.
And obese parents can have healthy weight offspring.
It’s an odds thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With 50% marriages ending in divorce, you cut your dating pool by half with this approach. If after age 35, you effectively cut it by 70-80%
Nah. That statistic includes the same person getting divorced over and over again. Also if you control for income and education level it’s lower too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't believe so many of you have taken the side that this makes sense. It's so judgmental. I am not the same person as my mother. I'm a competent adult with my own thoughts and values and I make my own choices. If you're not competent enough to do the same, then you make a bad partner whether or not your parents are married or divorced. It's inane that I would be judged based on my parents' choices (and my parents aren't divorced, just saying this hypothetically). If you judge me based on them, then good riddance to you, I dodged a bullet.
What if cancer runs in someone's family? Would you not marry them because either your kids might get cancer on the early side, or they might get cancer and you'd become a widow/widower? I don't agree with this either but it actually makes more sense because cancer is actually something that's genetic that you can't control. Choices are under your control, assuming you're mentally healthy to start with.
I don't see so many agreeing. It is a judgement based on statistics. It's not even a huge discrepancy in statistics. Clearly people need to see others as individuals and not percentage points of likelihood to do something or not.
I think the thing here is that the PP (above this last one)who is feeling “judged” is taking it personally as though the guy is saying she isn’t “worthy” of dating bc of her parents’ divorce. And I get where anecdotally it feels icky and offensive if you fall into that group bc you totally could make a different choice than your parents and get married and stay married! But as this PP pointed out, statistically, if the goal is to make sure you stay married, it’s a better bet to date a girl whose parents are not divorced. That’s just a fact.
It’s like it you want your kids to grow up going to church just like your family did, then statistically you should aim to date and marry someone whose family also went to church every week. Doesn’t mean that there aren’t people who are converts after having kids OR who go to church even though their parents didn’t! It just means that if you want to better your odds at being a church-going family, you marry someone whose family of origin already shares that as a valued norm and practice.
No need to get offended. There are always exceptions. And maybe that fiancé missed out on dating some great girls...but he set the parameters based on statistics, not on you (or anyone else) personally so that he could heighten the odds of achieving his no-divorce goal.
Too many words. Is the goal a happy marriage, or not getting divorced? Those are two separate things. Avoiding potential partners whose parents who are divorced does nothing to further the goal of a happy marriage as far as I can tell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Majority of divorced people come here and post about all the red flags they didn't see or chose to avoid.
It doesn't mean their parents were divorced.
Anonymous wrote:Majority of divorced people come here and post about all the red flags they didn't see or chose to avoid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Soon there won't be anyone to marry as they are all not financially independent, coming from intact families, or just having much experience in a family environment or this country. Make whatever criteria you want. Just don't be sad when you don't have kids because you waited too long or don't have a partner who shares your interests because of a resume.
So instead stick a troubled or broken family to future kids?
Anonymous wrote:Soon there won't be anyone to marry as they are all not financially independent, coming from intact families, or just having much experience in a family environment or this country. Make whatever criteria you want. Just don't be sad when you don't have kids because you waited too long or don't have a partner who shares your interests because of a resume.