Anonymous wrote:The despair propaganda here is over the top.
Anytime you hear people say “we can do nothing, let’s give up”, you should stop listening to them.
That’s an attitude for losers.
Americans are a can-do people.
We CAN ban guns. We CAN increase enforcement of violent crime. We can do lots of things if we don’t just give up like sad sacks— if we are active and work for them
Anonymous wrote:PCP is my guess. We could turn resources to ending PCP distribution and use since it makes people crazier than other drugs. Crazed drug addict is a blanket term but some drugs do make you violent and hallucinate while others don't. PCP and meth come to mind.
DC has a high level of PCP use.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PCP is my guess. We could turn resources to ending PCP distribution and use since it makes people crazier than other drugs. Crazed drug addict is a blanket term but some drugs do make you violent and hallucinate while others don't. PCP and meth come to mind.
DC has a high level of PCP use.
Sadly there is no appetite in DC for the kind of law enforcement it would take to do anything about this. Obviously.
That needs to change. It's a type of bandaid harm reduction but PCP is bad news. Meth too because they mess with your mind. Even if this guy wasn't on it, the woman who threw her dead infant in the trash last week was because she admitted it. The other thing is people who are violent need to be contained. There is usually a history of problem behavior before the incident that makes the news.
Not the perfect answer because there isn't one but it's more concrete than debating guns endlessly. It ok to have some harsh restrictions if you're going to hurt other people.
Anonymous wrote:PCP is my guess. We could turn resources to ending PCP distribution and use since it makes people crazier than other drugs. Crazed drug addict is a blanket term but some drugs do make you violent and hallucinate while others don't. PCP and meth come to mind.
DC has a high level of PCP use.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PCP is my guess. We could turn resources to ending PCP distribution and use since it makes people crazier than other drugs. Crazed drug addict is a blanket term but some drugs do make you violent and hallucinate while others don't. PCP and meth come to mind.
DC has a high level of PCP use.
Sadly there is no appetite in DC for the kind of law enforcement it would take to do anything about this. Obviously.
Anonymous wrote:PCP is my guess. We could turn resources to ending PCP distribution and use since it makes people crazier than other drugs. Crazed drug addict is a blanket term but some drugs do make you violent and hallucinate while others don't. PCP and meth come to mind.
DC has a high level of PCP use.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, so here's the thing about the gun argument. [b]Guns proliferate in other communities, but they don't seem to share in the violence that overtakes some cities/communities. Simply saying "GUNS" is simplistic and doesn't come close to identifying deep problems that you probably don't want to discuss anyway.[b]
Also, Australia. Yeah, an island nation that would be pretty easy to seal off from illegal weapons. The USA, not so much. Not to be cliche, but it really applies: when you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns. That's just how it is with porous borders and many, many guns in circulation. It's a pipedream if you think we could outlaw guns and get rid of "gun violence" at the same time.
+1. Yep. There are plenty of communities with lots of guns, but not all of them are as violent as DC. So there is something else going on, but I think people are afraid to have that conversation.
A lot of it is drugs. I'd bet anything this monster was out of his mind from drug use.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, so here's the thing about the gun argument. [b]Guns proliferate in other communities, but they don't seem to share in the violence that overtakes some cities/communities. Simply saying "GUNS" is simplistic and doesn't come close to identifying deep problems that you probably don't want to discuss anyway.[b]
Also, Australia. Yeah, an island nation that would be pretty easy to seal off from illegal weapons. The USA, not so much. Not to be cliche, but it really applies: when you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns. That's just how it is with porous borders and many, many guns in circulation. It's a pipedream if you think we could outlaw guns and get rid of "gun violence" at the same time.
+1. Yep. There are plenty of communities with lots of guns, but not all of them are as violent as DC. So there is something else going on, but I think people are afraid to have that conversation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, so here's the thing about the gun argument. [b]Guns proliferate in other communities, but they don't seem to share in the violence that overtakes some cities/communities. Simply saying "GUNS" is simplistic and doesn't come close to identifying deep problems that you probably don't want to discuss anyway.[b]
Also, Australia. Yeah, an island nation that would be pretty easy to seal off from illegal weapons. The USA, not so much. Not to be cliche, but it really applies: when you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns. That's just how it is with porous borders and many, many guns in circulation. It's a pipedream if you think we could outlaw guns and get rid of "gun violence" at the same time.
+1. Yep. There are plenty of communities with lots of guns, but not all of them are as violent as DC. So there is something else going on, but I think people are afraid to have that conversation.
Absolutely correct.... and absolutely *desperate* to avoid that unpleasant conversation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, so here's the thing about the gun argument. [b]Guns proliferate in other communities, but they don't seem to share in the violence that overtakes some cities/communities. Simply saying "GUNS" is simplistic and doesn't come close to identifying deep problems that you probably don't want to discuss anyway.[b]
Also, Australia. Yeah, an island nation that would be pretty easy to seal off from illegal weapons. The USA, not so much. Not to be cliche, but it really applies: when you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns. That's just how it is with porous borders and many, many guns in circulation. It's a pipedream if you think we could outlaw guns and get rid of "gun violence" at the same time.
+1. Yep. There are plenty of communities with lots of guns, but not all of them are as violent as DC. So there is something else going on, but I think people are afraid to have that conversation.
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, so here's the thing about the gun argument. [b]Guns proliferate in other communities, but they don't seem to share in the violence that overtakes some cities/communities. Simply saying "GUNS" is simplistic and doesn't come close to identifying deep problems that you probably don't want to discuss anyway.[b]
Also, Australia. Yeah, an island nation that would be pretty easy to seal off from illegal weapons. The USA, not so much. Not to be cliche, but it really applies: when you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns. That's just how it is with porous borders and many, many guns in circulation. It's a pipedream if you think we could outlaw guns and get rid of "gun violence" at the same time.
Anonymous wrote:"This is a horrible story and one which should teach everyone to be very careful."
It is a horrible story, but instead of teaching people to be "very careful," it should instead serve as evidence for banning hanguns in the United States like Australia has done.