Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow!
Right? She says an IUD was implanted in her against her will. Damn.
How can she be competent enough to perform onstage for millions but not competent enough to make her own reproductive decisions?
Anonymous wrote:We don’t know what her mental illness is.
Too many people here have no experience with schizophrenia.
That’s not to say the conservatorship shouldn’t be changed.
But we do not know whether if, left to her own devices, she’d be sleeping on the street. Again, unless you know well someone with schizophrenia please be cautious about how you comment. Why does she not want to be evaluated? Can she not sit for a few hours of the eval? If she can’t do that, how can she manage her own life? Maybe she’s fine. But we don’t know.
Anonymous wrote:This article is a little over a year old, but it answers a lot of the questions posters are raising here about Britney’s conservatorship and why it’s still in place - worth reading. She appears to want the conservatorship and the current dispute is only about who manages what.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/2288009001
Anonymous wrote:No one is putting Johnny Depp in a conservator ship for losing all his money. She made it it’s her to handle poorly if she wants. This is a travesty
Anonymous wrote:If you weren't already crazy, having someone control all of the decisions in your life would certainly make you crazy. If she is competent enough to work and not on drugs, it seems like having a conservator is like enslavement for her.
I do think the court would have to have some sort of mental health evaluation where Brittany is asked about how she would handle the finances or who she would hire, etc. But, if she is able to describe a plan, and she can pass a drug test, there isn't any reason she shouldn't be allowed to control her own destiny.
Anonymous wrote:Wow!