Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.
You have no ability to support this statement bc there is no data.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.
You have no ability to support this statement bc there is no data.
There are many parents who are afraid to voice their opinions at LAMB because of the over-the-top bullying they receive from the cultish parents on ParentSquare. Without an unbiased, anonymous survey that protects parents who express their opinions, we really don't know what "most" LAMB parents think.
Bullying? Cult? I thought they were kumbaya peace circle organizers with a dash of Spanish?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.
You have no ability to support this statement bc there is no data.
There are many parents who are afraid to voice their opinions at LAMB because of the over-the-top bullying they receive from the cultish parents on ParentSquare. Without an unbiased, anonymous survey that protects parents who express their opinions, we really don't know what "most" LAMB parents think.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.
You have no ability to support this statement bc there is no data.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think these Washington post education hit pieces are very productive.
Meh. It got the administration of LAMB to actually start TALKING about reopening, and it got the PTO to say it would form a committee.
Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.
Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think these Washington post education hit pieces are very productive.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think these Washington post education hit pieces are very productive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP but no. The point is that teachers are refusing to return based on no scientific evidence or expertise. They simply say they are not safe returning, but refuse to articulate something reasonable would make them feel safe.
We don't actually know this. We don't know if they have been asked to articulate anything like this. Please stop being so obstructionist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP but no. The point is that teachers are refusing to return based on no scientific evidence or expertise. They simply say they are not safe returning, but refuse to articulate something reasonable would make them feel safe.
We don't actually know this. We don't know if they have been asked to articulate anything like this. Please stop being so obstructionist.
That's not what obstructionist means. Have you seen it articulated anywhere? No. Because they haven't done it. They don't have to be invited to do give a reason. They SHOULD do it when they simply refuse to return because it's not safe. Otherwise, they're actually being obstructionist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP but no. The point is that teachers are refusing to return based on no scientific evidence or expertise. They simply say they are not safe returning, but refuse to articulate something reasonable would make them feel safe.
We don't actually know this. We don't know if they have been asked to articulate anything like this. Please stop being so obstructionist.
Anonymous wrote:DP but no. The point is that teachers are refusing to return based on no scientific evidence or expertise. They simply say they are not safe returning, but refuse to articulate something reasonable would make them feel safe.