Anonymous
11/29/2021 11:12
Subject: Nest level lacrosse: girls
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Interesting that the NL 28s are ranked that high. They lost to M&D and tied the only other decent team on their schedule. The rest of their games are cupcakes.
Way too early for those rankings to mean anything outside of the top teams. As you said until they start playing against better competition we will not know much.
These rankings are really good come June, but right now, nearly worthless.
Anonymous
11/29/2021 10:25
Subject: Nest level lacrosse: girls
Anonymous wrote:
Interesting that the NL 28s are ranked that high. They lost to M&D and tied the only other decent team on their schedule. The rest of their games are cupcakes.
Way too early for those rankings to mean anything outside of the top teams. As you said until they start playing against better competition we will not know much.
Anonymous
11/29/2021 07:50
Subject: Nest level lacrosse: girls
Interesting that the NL 28s are ranked that high. They lost to M&D and tied the only other decent team on their schedule. The rest of their games are cupcakes.
Anonymous
11/26/2021 19:01
Subject: Nest level lacrosse: girls
Anonymous
11/16/2021 09:24
Subject: Nest level lacrosse: girls
Anonymous wrote:3 out of the 4 teams NL 2029 played during the round robin play were 2030 teams. I don’t understand why that team does not get the opportunity to play A level teams.
Seems to be a running trend for NL. LOW bracket placement for their teams
Anonymous
11/16/2021 09:06
Subject: Nest level lacrosse: girls
3 out of the 4 teams NL 2029 played during the round robin play were 2030 teams. I don’t understand why that team does not get the opportunity to play A level teams.
Anonymous
11/15/2021 22:24
Subject: Nest level lacrosse: girls
Wow - thanks so much for the really helpful tip!
There are no playoff scores posted on Tourney Machine for any of the games from the Mid Atlantic Showcase.
There are no playoff scores posted on Tourney Machine for any of the games from the Mid Atlantic Showcase.
Anonymous
11/15/2021 22:12
Subject: Re:Nest level lacrosse: girls
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Next level 2029 lost in semi finals.
Any idea who they lost to and what the score was?
Do you know how the tourney machine app works? If you are invested enough into elementary school lacrosse to post on a forum about it, you should probably figure that app out to inform yourself.
Anonymous
11/15/2021 22:00
Subject: Re:Nest level lacrosse: girls
Anonymous wrote:Next level 2029 lost in semi finals.
Any idea who they lost to and what the score was?
Anonymous
11/15/2021 21:34
Subject: Re:Nest level lacrosse: girls
Next level 2029 lost in semi finals.
Anonymous
11/15/2021 17:01
Subject: Re:Nest level lacrosse: girls
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can't compare them because they have played none of the same teams. NL has played in the lowest bracket kf every tournament they entered and won, and BLC has lost in higher brackets. So neither are lighting things up imo.
My DD’s team played both BLC and NL this fall. I’m no expert, but from what I saw it seemed like NL gave them more of a fight. Probably wouldn’t be helpful to compare scores because NL game was shorter playoff game.
I guess I am not sue why anyone is trying to compare them in the first place. They are both average at best when it comes to the teams in DMV. If it is a parent deciding between the two, you are probably splitting hairs and should look at other MD or NoVa clubs before those two regardless.
Hit the nail on the head. All 3 MC teams are on a much lower level than Pride/Stars and don't even bother comparing to other MD programs.
Just curious why no one ever considers Rebels when talking about MC clubs. Seem to be fairly competitive with the others...
Excellent question. We switched from MC Elite to Rebels in 2020 and are happy we did (were with Bethesda before MC Elite). It is nice to have consistent coaching from local high school coaches and that is not mainly parent coaches. Rebels does tend to get more of the northern MoCo kids and pulls from Frederick and Howard as well. Maybe that is part of it?
Plus, Rebels is $1000 cheaper, at least, on top of everything else.
Anonymous
11/15/2021 15:52
Subject: Re:Nest level lacrosse: girls
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Happy for Next Level that they were at MidAtlantic at least. What year team was there?
28's and 29's.
How did the NL 29 team do at MidAtlantic?
Anonymous
11/15/2021 15:17
Subject: Re:Nest level lacrosse: girls
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can't compare them because they have played none of the same teams. NL has played in the lowest bracket kf every tournament they entered and won, and BLC has lost in higher brackets. So neither are lighting things up imo.
My DD’s team played both BLC and NL this fall. I’m no expert, but from what I saw it seemed like NL gave them more of a fight. Probably wouldn’t be helpful to compare scores because NL game was shorter playoff game.
I guess I am not sue why anyone is trying to compare them in the first place. They are both average at best when it comes to the teams in DMV. If it is a parent deciding between the two, you are probably splitting hairs and should look at other MD or NoVa clubs before those two regardless.
Hit the nail on the head. All 3 MC teams are on a much lower level than Pride/Stars and don't even bother comparing to other MD programs.
Just curious why no one ever considers Rebels when talking about MC clubs. Seem to be fairly competitive with the others...
Anonymous
11/15/2021 14:57
Subject: Re:Nest level lacrosse: girls
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can't compare them because they have played none of the same teams. NL has played in the lowest bracket kf every tournament they entered and won, and BLC has lost in higher brackets. So neither are lighting things up imo.
My DD’s team played both BLC and NL this fall. I’m no expert, but from what I saw it seemed like NL gave them more of a fight. Probably wouldn’t be helpful to compare scores because NL game was shorter playoff game.
I guess I am not sue why anyone is trying to compare them in the first place. They are both average at best when it comes to the teams in DMV. If it is a parent deciding between the two, you are probably splitting hairs and should look at other MD or NoVa clubs before those two regardless.
Hit the nail on the head. All 3 MC teams are on a much lower level than Pride/Stars and don't even bother comparing to other MD programs.
Anonymous
11/15/2021 13:43
Subject: Re:Nest level lacrosse: girls
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can't compare them because they have played none of the same teams. NL has played in the lowest bracket kf every tournament they entered and won, and BLC has lost in higher brackets. So neither are lighting things up imo.
My DD’s team played both BLC and NL this fall. I’m no expert, but from what I saw it seemed like NL gave them more of a fight. Probably wouldn’t be helpful to compare scores because NL game was shorter playoff game.
I guess I am not sue why anyone is trying to compare them in the first place. They are both average at best when it comes to the teams in DMV. If it is a parent deciding between the two, you are probably splitting hairs and should look at other MD or NoVa clubs before those two regardless.