Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HS for both ECNL and GA will be th I same except GA
won’t shut down like ECNL. Kids/parents will decide if their child wants to play. Some kids will and some won’t. The priority will be the club team. Both programs (ECNL/GA) are terrific options. I am glad it all worked out. I know families in both and everyone seems
happy.

haha, so you're saying the HS treatment will be the same, only different, right?
There's a big difference IMO. One endorses HS soccer, the other kinda sorta accepts that some girls may want to compromise their teams by doing it, and that is ok... I guess.

Revisionist history here. Ecnl was discouraging Hs strongly until GDA came along and it became a marketing angle. Come on now. Ecnl is some organization of noble individuals looking out for the best interests of players. Give it a rest.

Believe me, I'm not saying ECNL is noble, I'm just looking at the policies as they stand today. I've been through Terry's shaming method (yes in ECNL), and it doesn't work. GA should either endorse HS, or not, leaving it ambiguous (as they appear to be doing) makes it harder on the girls that want to play HS.

Terry has been gone a number of years now. What kind of loser who had a kid play for him years ago is on a message board about youth soccer?

So what kind of perv is hanging around these boards?

I have more than one daughter, fool. Sheez, grow up.

Don't worry buddy. This is what they do. Leftist tactic 101. Scream in your face and throw every negative connotation your way until you back down. Hence, your a "perv" for posting on a soccer forum.

Leftist? Lol.

All I know is there certainly a lot of ECNL posters in here posting about a third tier league. Why the interest in a third tier league?

I agree, that is apparently all you know. I am interested in GA, because I'm always evaluating the options critically that's why. Families should not be trusting any league to do the right things, and to uphold promises. That would include ECNL, GA, and any other league. We make choices every year.

Not sure how the post offends you but you do you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HS for both ECNL and GA will be th I same except GA
won’t shut down like ECNL. Kids/parents will decide if their child wants to play. Some kids will and some won’t. The priority will be the club team. Both programs (ECNL/GA) are terrific options. I am glad it all worked out. I know families in both and everyone seems
happy.

haha, so you're saying the HS treatment will be the same, only different, right?
There's a big difference IMO. One endorses HS soccer, the other kinda sorta accepts that some girls may want to compromise their teams by doing it, and that is ok... I guess.

Revisionist history here. Ecnl was discouraging Hs strongly until GDA came along and it became a marketing angle. Come on now. Ecnl is some organization of noble individuals looking out for the best interests of players. Give it a rest.

Believe me, I'm not saying ECNL is noble, I'm just looking at the policies as they stand today. I've been through Terry's shaming method (yes in ECNL), and it doesn't work. GA should either endorse HS, or not, leaving it ambiguous (as they appear to be doing) makes it harder on the girls that want to play HS.

Terry has been gone a number of years now. What kind of loser who had a kid play for him years ago is on a message board about youth soccer?

So what kind of perv is hanging around these boards?

I have more than one daughter, fool. Sheez, grow up.

Don't worry buddy. This is what they do. Leftist tactic 101. Scream in your face and throw every negative connotation your way until you back down. Hence, your a "perv" for posting on a soccer forum.

Leftist? Lol.

All I know is there certainly a lot of ECNL posters in here posting about a third tier league. Why the interest in a third tier league?

I agree, that is apparently all you know. I am interested in GA, because I'm always evaluating the options critically that's why. Families should not be trusting any league to do the right things, and to uphold promises. That would include ECNL, GA, and any other league. We make choices every year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SA: The Development Player League in its announcement about the Girls Academy League mentioned "offering the flexibility to play high school soccer."

RICK DERELLA: It's going to be a 10-month season, but most states can play high school at the same time as club. In Connecticut, you cannot.

SA: The distinction would be that instead of the Development Academy, which banned girls from playing high school, now girls will be allowed to play if it's practical and permissible.

RICK DERELLA: The problem is, the science doesn't match. Anyone that believes in periodization can't believe in doing both.

This actually does seem consistent with what we heard from our club earlier this week -- it sound like "permitted in unusual circumstances, but discouraged."

Sounds to me that is it left to be individual decision, some kids want it some don't, but the season for GA won't stop for HS soccer. Creative coaches can figure it out. I like the idea that there are options for all players and no over reaching rules from a league.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HS for both ECNL and GA will be th I same except GA
won’t shut down like ECNL. Kids/parents will decide if their child wants to play. Some kids will and some won’t. The priority will be the club team. Both programs (ECNL/GA) are terrific options. I am glad it all worked out. I know families in both and everyone seems
happy.

haha, so you're saying the HS treatment will be the same, only different, right?
There's a big difference IMO. One endorses HS soccer, the other kinda sorta accepts that some girls may want to compromise their teams by doing it, and that is ok... I guess.

Revisionist history here. Ecnl was discouraging Hs strongly until GDA came along and it became a marketing angle. Come on now. Ecnl is some organization of noble individuals looking out for the best interests of players. Give it a rest.

Believe me, I'm not saying ECNL is noble, I'm just looking at the policies as they stand today. I've been through Terry's shaming method (yes in ECNL), and it doesn't work. GA should either endorse HS, or not, leaving it ambiguous (as they appear to be doing) makes it harder on the girls that want to play HS.

Terry has been gone a number of years now. What kind of loser who had a kid play for him years ago is on a message board about youth soccer?

So what kind of perv is hanging around these boards?

I have more than one daughter, fool. Sheez, grow up.

Don't worry buddy. This is what they do. Leftist tactic 101. Scream in your face and throw every negative connotation your way until you back down. Hence, your a "perv" for posting on a soccer forum.

Leftist? Lol.

All I know is there certainly a lot of ECNL posters in here posting about a third tier league. Why the interest in a third tier league?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is it that you guys have with VDA . Why is it that you need to bash them all the time. Is it because you need to prove something. My DD plays for a Md team. We have played both teams . I would say both FCV and VDA team has some talent players. What you should be worrying about is if your DD will even play at a college level . Be realistic not all these girls will be playing in college.

Not all of VDA will not play at the college level. That much is true.

don't forget D3 is a college level too - Bring on Bridgewater! Or at the very best - Coastal Carolina

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HS for both ECNL and GA will be th I same except GA
won’t shut down like ECNL. Kids/parents will decide if their child wants to play. Some kids will and some won’t. The priority will be the club team. Both programs (ECNL/GA) are terrific options. I am glad it all worked out. I know families in both and everyone seems
happy.

haha, so you're saying the HS treatment will be the same, only different, right?
There's a big difference IMO. One endorses HS soccer, the other kinda sorta accepts that some girls may want to compromise their teams by doing it, and that is ok... I guess.

Revisionist history here. Ecnl was discouraging Hs strongly until GDA came along and it became a marketing angle. Come on now. Ecnl is some organization of noble individuals looking out for the best interests of players. Give it a rest.

Believe me, I'm not saying ECNL is noble, I'm just looking at the policies as they stand today. I've been through Terry's shaming method (yes in ECNL), and it doesn't work. GA should either endorse HS, or not, leaving it ambiguous (as they appear to be doing) makes it harder on the girls that want to play HS.

Terry has been gone a number of years now. What kind of loser who had a kid play for him years ago is on a message board about youth soccer?

So what kind of perv is hanging around these boards?

I have more than one daughter, fool. Sheez, grow up.

Don't worry buddy. This is what they do. Leftist tactic 101. Scream in your face and throw every negative connotation your way until you back down. Hence, your a "perv" for posting on a soccer forum.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SA: The Development Player League in its announcement about the Girls Academy League mentioned "offering the flexibility to play high school soccer."

RICK DERELLA: It's going to be a 10-month season, but most states can play high school at the same time as club. In Connecticut, you cannot.

SA: The distinction would be that instead of the Development Academy, which banned girls from playing high school, now girls will be allowed to play if it's practical and permissible.

RICK DERELLA: The problem is, the science doesn't match. Anyone that believes in periodization can't believe in doing both.

This actually does seem consistent with what we heard from our club earlier this week -- it sound like "permitted in unusual circumstances, but discouraged."