Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know how the supposed uproar started? I think Peloton just created the fake controversy for publicity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a liberal woman who is NOT offended by the ad. Heck, I’m even a bit overweight. Here’s my take on the ad: she’s a working mom with a demanding job (just like me) and she and her husband have a high HHI. Her husband knows her friends have Pelotons and she wanted one...even though they have a gym membership and she’s done barre and yoga. But she explained that it would be so much more convenient to have the peloton in the house so she doesn’t need to leave the house and find a sitter since he’s always on work travel or golfing. He obviously doesn’t need the guilt or a fight, so he bought her the peloton. NBD because they can easily afford it.
I think the drama over the ad is ridiculous.
Why must everyone assign malicious intent? Why see evil in everything? Why create issues that don’t exist? So stupid.
I could see her sunken Bambi eyes of a woman with an eating disorder:
![]()
I would have preferred if they picked a slightly sturdier looking actress.
Yes! I'm the pp who said I think it has something to do with her look. Her eyes have this pleading "help me" look.
Anonymous wrote:Let’s face it IRL the bike will get use for five days for the entire year. In 5 years, they will try to sell the bike for full asking price on eBay.
Anonymous wrote:Did the company ever explain what the actual storyline was supposed to be? I am not angry about the ad, I just truly don’t get what the wife supposedly gained in the year. She still seemed pretty unsure about herself when she was showing him the video.
Anonymous wrote:This is a much more authentic gift reveal and probably would have made a better commercial...would have saved a ton of money as well.
https://www.facebook.com/patrice.g.parks/videos/10100579416601899/
Anonymous wrote:She is now in a gin ad
https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/07/us/peloton-ad-ryan-reynolds-gin-trnd/index.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a liberal woman who is NOT offended by the ad. Heck, I’m even a bit overweight. Here’s my take on the ad: she’s a working mom with a demanding job (just like me) and she and her husband have a high HHI. Her husband knows her friends have Pelotons and she wanted one...even though they have a gym membership and she’s done barre and yoga. But she explained that it would be so much more convenient to have the peloton in the house so she doesn’t need to leave the house and find a sitter since he’s always on work travel or golfing. He obviously doesn’t need the guilt or a fight, so he bought her the peloton. NBD because they can easily afford it.
I think the drama over the ad is ridiculous.
Why must everyone assign malicious intent? Why see evil in everything? Why create issues that don’t exist? So stupid.
I could see her sunken Bambi eyes of a woman with an eating disorder:
![]()
I would have preferred if they picked a slightly sturdier looking actress.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a liberal woman who is NOT offended by the ad. Heck, I’m even a bit overweight. Here’s my take on the ad: she’s a working mom with a demanding job (just like me) and she and her husband have a high HHI. Her husband knows her friends have Pelotons and she wanted one...even though they have a gym membership and she’s done barre and yoga. But she explained that it would be so much more convenient to have the peloton in the house so she doesn’t need to leave the house and find a sitter since he’s always on work travel or golfing. He obviously doesn’t need the guilt or a fight, so he bought her the peloton. NBD because they can easily afford it.
I think the drama over the ad is ridiculous.
Why must everyone assign malicious intent? Why see evil in everything? Why create issues that don’t exist? So stupid.
Anonymous wrote:She is now in a gin ad
https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/07/us/peloton-ad-ryan-reynolds-gin-trnd/index.html