Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How is it a crisis if there is tons of affordable housing in VA and Md with easy city access?
I live in Va and I am not sure what the hell you are talking about. We had a similar housing shortage here, even before Amazon and its getting worse. Arlington and Alexandria are facing substantial loss of market rate affordable units, and are both scrambling to create/preserve committed affordable units. There is also activity to create AH in Falls Church and Fairfax, and this was a big issue in the recent Board of Supervisors election in Fairfax County. To address shortages at higher income levels, there is massive new construction across NoVa, some in Alexandria, more in Arlington, some in Falls Church, and in several parts of Fairfax (and now even Loudoun and PWC are doing transit oriented development). Plus easy city access is questionable, and with highways maxed out major new transit investments are needed.
So you probably really mean Maryland. But when you look closer you will see MoCo has the same issues as NoVa. So you really mean PG County. So we are talking about the old solution, send the poors to PG.
But as you will note even parts of PG (like Hyattsville) are getting gentrified. And of course most of PG does not have great access - it has poor access to its metro stops, and congested highways.
So really you mean a relatively small area within walking distance of the PG metro stations.
Most of which are filled with existing SFHs, which are occupied by families.
Are they putting high rises in the middle of single family home neighborhoods in places like Falls Church, or in new developments or along major thoroughfares with apartment buildings?
Depends what you mean by "in the middle of" Falls Church they are mostly on Washington and on Broad - not at all far from detached SFHs (and right across the street from THs)
In Rosslyn - Ballston in North Arlington the County has created a buffer of THs between the denser apts and detached SFHs. No such buffer along Columbia Pike, but the height there is more limited.
Could you give an example from DC of what you mean?
Well in DC we have and continue to have apartment buildings go in as new development zones, including along Wisconsin Ave., obviously the ballpark etc. I'm confused where the Mayor would put 1,500 more units (as a fraction of other units? Or self contained?) in rock creek park west. Once you get off the main roads its all single family and duplex.[/quote
What "new development zones" are you referring to? There is no such thing actually but maybe you could articulate what it is you think you are saying?
Aside from the Fannie Mae project very few new projects have been built or are even planned for Wisconsin Avenue.
But there is definitely room for additional development on Wisconsin Avenue - lots of surface parking lots and 3-4 story 50-60 year old buildings that are near the end of their useful life. And there are some lots on Upper CT as well though not many.
But it is not that hard to get several thousand new units in Rock Creek West though it is an open question how the mayor will get her affordable housing units which the free market alone will not yield.
This is patently untrue, pure Greater Greater Washington propaganda.
There's Fannie Mae, and there's the massive, 716-unit residential/retail development coming directly to the north of it:
https://www.skiarch.com/projects/4000-wisconsin-avenue/
There's a planned six-story apartment building at Wisconsin and Macomb:
https://www.bisnow.com/washington-dc/news/multifamily/six-story-apartment-building-planned-to-replace-single-family-home-on-wisconsin-avenue-corner-98491
146-unit building coming to Wisconsin just above Brandywine:
http://www.urbaninvestmentpartners.com/project/broadcast/
The 100 units at 4000 Brandywine have been leasing for a while:
http://www.urbaninvestmentpartners.com/project/4000brandywine/
41-unit building coming to the Dancing Crab/Tenley Gastropub site:
https://dc.urbanturf.com/pipeline/755/Dancing_Crab_Redevelopment
So basically any parcel with a new building is a "new development zone"?
And a six story building, with a few dozen units, is "massive"?
It's not a few dozen, it's more than 1,000 units when you add the two developments together (again, they're going to be right next door to each other).
So yes, that's massive by any definition. I know this goes against the propaganda pushed by David Alpert and his sycophants, but yes, there is new housing going up in Upper NW. Actually a lot of it. Why some people go to great lengths to deny clear facts is absolutely baffling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How is it a crisis if there is tons of affordable housing in VA and Md with easy city access?
I live in Va and I am not sure what the hell you are talking about. We had a similar housing shortage here, even before Amazon and its getting worse. Arlington and Alexandria are facing substantial loss of market rate affordable units, and are both scrambling to create/preserve committed affordable units. There is also activity to create AH in Falls Church and Fairfax, and this was a big issue in the recent Board of Supervisors election in Fairfax County. To address shortages at higher income levels, there is massive new construction across NoVa, some in Alexandria, more in Arlington, some in Falls Church, and in several parts of Fairfax (and now even Loudoun and PWC are doing transit oriented development). Plus easy city access is questionable, and with highways maxed out major new transit investments are needed.
So you probably really mean Maryland. But when you look closer you will see MoCo has the same issues as NoVa. So you really mean PG County. So we are talking about the old solution, send the poors to PG.
But as you will note even parts of PG (like Hyattsville) are getting gentrified. And of course most of PG does not have great access - it has poor access to its metro stops, and congested highways.
So really you mean a relatively small area within walking distance of the PG metro stations.
Most of which are filled with existing SFHs, which are occupied by families.
Are they putting high rises in the middle of single family home neighborhoods in places like Falls Church, or in new developments or along major thoroughfares with apartment buildings?
Depends what you mean by "in the middle of" Falls Church they are mostly on Washington and on Broad - not at all far from detached SFHs (and right across the street from THs)
In Rosslyn - Ballston in North Arlington the County has created a buffer of THs between the denser apts and detached SFHs. No such buffer along Columbia Pike, but the height there is more limited.
Could you give an example from DC of what you mean?
Well in DC we have and continue to have apartment buildings go in as new development zones, including along Wisconsin Ave., obviously the ballpark etc. I'm confused where the Mayor would put 1,500 more units (as a fraction of other units? Or self contained?) in rock creek park west. Once you get off the main roads its all single family and duplex.[/quote
What "new development zones" are you referring to? There is no such thing actually but maybe you could articulate what it is you think you are saying?
Aside from the Fannie Mae project very few new projects have been built or are even planned for Wisconsin Avenue.
But there is definitely room for additional development on Wisconsin Avenue - lots of surface parking lots and 3-4 story 50-60 year old buildings that are near the end of their useful life. And there are some lots on Upper CT as well though not many.
But it is not that hard to get several thousand new units in Rock Creek West though it is an open question how the mayor will get her affordable housing units which the free market alone will not yield.
It's in buildings like this where many affordable units are found today, including in areas with good transit and good schools. When there is upzoning, which creates incentives for developers bulldoze these to create The Upscale Residences at Wisconsin Heights, many lower-priced units are lost where they are needed most.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How is it a crisis if there is tons of affordable housing in VA and Md with easy city access?
I live in Va and I am not sure what the hell you are talking about. We had a similar housing shortage here, even before Amazon and its getting worse. Arlington and Alexandria are facing substantial loss of market rate affordable units, and are both scrambling to create/preserve committed affordable units. There is also activity to create AH in Falls Church and Fairfax, and this was a big issue in the recent Board of Supervisors election in Fairfax County. To address shortages at higher income levels, there is massive new construction across NoVa, some in Alexandria, more in Arlington, some in Falls Church, and in several parts of Fairfax (and now even Loudoun and PWC are doing transit oriented development). Plus easy city access is questionable, and with highways maxed out major new transit investments are needed.
So you probably really mean Maryland. But when you look closer you will see MoCo has the same issues as NoVa. So you really mean PG County. So we are talking about the old solution, send the poors to PG.
But as you will note even parts of PG (like Hyattsville) are getting gentrified. And of course most of PG does not have great access - it has poor access to its metro stops, and congested highways.
So really you mean a relatively small area within walking distance of the PG metro stations.
Most of which are filled with existing SFHs, which are occupied by families.
Are they putting high rises in the middle of single family home neighborhoods in places like Falls Church, or in new developments or along major thoroughfares with apartment buildings?
Depends what you mean by "in the middle of" Falls Church they are mostly on Washington and on Broad - not at all far from detached SFHs (and right across the street from THs)
In Rosslyn - Ballston in North Arlington the County has created a buffer of THs between the denser apts and detached SFHs. No such buffer along Columbia Pike, but the height there is more limited.
Could you give an example from DC of what you mean?
Well in DC we have and continue to have apartment buildings go in as new development zones, including along Wisconsin Ave., obviously the ballpark etc. I'm confused where the Mayor would put 1,500 more units (as a fraction of other units? Or self contained?) in rock creek park west. Once you get off the main roads its all single family and duplex.[/quote
What "new development zones" are you referring to? There is no such thing actually but maybe you could articulate what it is you think you are saying?
Aside from the Fannie Mae project very few new projects have been built or are even planned for Wisconsin Avenue.
But there is definitely room for additional development on Wisconsin Avenue - lots of surface parking lots and 3-4 story 50-60 year old buildings that are near the end of their useful life. And there are some lots on Upper CT as well though not many.
But it is not that hard to get several thousand new units in Rock Creek West though it is an open question how the mayor will get her affordable housing units which the free market alone will not yield.
This is patently untrue, pure Greater Greater Washington propaganda.
There's Fannie Mae, and there's the massive, 716-unit residential/retail development coming directly to the north of it:
https://www.skiarch.com/projects/4000-wisconsin-avenue/
There's a planned six-story apartment building at Wisconsin and Macomb:
https://www.bisnow.com/washington-dc/news/multifamily/six-story-apartment-building-planned-to-replace-single-family-home-on-wisconsin-avenue-corner-98491
146-unit building coming to Wisconsin just above Brandywine:
http://www.urbaninvestmentpartners.com/project/broadcast/
The 100 units at 4000 Brandywine have been leasing for a while:
http://www.urbaninvestmentpartners.com/project/4000brandywine/
41-unit building coming to the Dancing Crab/Tenley Gastropub site:
https://dc.urbanturf.com/pipeline/755/Dancing_Crab_Redevelopment
So basically any parcel with a new building is a "new development zone"?
And a six story building, with a few dozen units, is "massive"?
The Fannie Mae/Roadside development and 4000 Wisconsin block next door together will be almost 1,600 residences - within two or three city blocks. That's pretty massive. Between 8 and 10 percent will be considered "inclusive zoning" units. The mayor and her office of planning talk a good game about affordable housing, but she hasn't proposed or done anything to increase inclusory zoning requirements, even in the largest projects.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How is it a crisis if there is tons of affordable housing in VA and Md with easy city access?
I live in Va and I am not sure what the hell you are talking about. We had a similar housing shortage here, even before Amazon and its getting worse. Arlington and Alexandria are facing substantial loss of market rate affordable units, and are both scrambling to create/preserve committed affordable units. There is also activity to create AH in Falls Church and Fairfax, and this was a big issue in the recent Board of Supervisors election in Fairfax County. To address shortages at higher income levels, there is massive new construction across NoVa, some in Alexandria, more in Arlington, some in Falls Church, and in several parts of Fairfax (and now even Loudoun and PWC are doing transit oriented development). Plus easy city access is questionable, and with highways maxed out major new transit investments are needed.
So you probably really mean Maryland. But when you look closer you will see MoCo has the same issues as NoVa. So you really mean PG County. So we are talking about the old solution, send the poors to PG.
But as you will note even parts of PG (like Hyattsville) are getting gentrified. And of course most of PG does not have great access - it has poor access to its metro stops, and congested highways.
So really you mean a relatively small area within walking distance of the PG metro stations.
Most of which are filled with existing SFHs, which are occupied by families.
Are they putting high rises in the middle of single family home neighborhoods in places like Falls Church, or in new developments or along major thoroughfares with apartment buildings?
Depends what you mean by "in the middle of" Falls Church they are mostly on Washington and on Broad - not at all far from detached SFHs (and right across the street from THs)
In Rosslyn - Ballston in North Arlington the County has created a buffer of THs between the denser apts and detached SFHs. No such buffer along Columbia Pike, but the height there is more limited.
Could you give an example from DC of what you mean?
Well in DC we have and continue to have apartment buildings go in as new development zones, including along Wisconsin Ave., obviously the ballpark etc. I'm confused where the Mayor would put 1,500 more units (as a fraction of other units? Or self contained?) in rock creek park west. Once you get off the main roads its all single family and duplex.[/quote
What "new development zones" are you referring to? There is no such thing actually but maybe you could articulate what it is you think you are saying?
Aside from the Fannie Mae project very few new projects have been built or are even planned for Wisconsin Avenue.
But there is definitely room for additional development on Wisconsin Avenue - lots of surface parking lots and 3-4 story 50-60 year old buildings that are near the end of their useful life. And there are some lots on Upper CT as well though not many.
But it is not that hard to get several thousand new units in Rock Creek West though it is an open question how the mayor will get her affordable housing units which the free market alone will not yield.
This is patently untrue, pure Greater Greater Washington propaganda.
There's Fannie Mae, and there's the massive, 716-unit residential/retail development coming directly to the north of it:
https://www.skiarch.com/projects/4000-wisconsin-avenue/
There's a planned six-story apartment building at Wisconsin and Macomb:
https://www.bisnow.com/washington-dc/news/multifamily/six-story-apartment-building-planned-to-replace-single-family-home-on-wisconsin-avenue-corner-98491
146-unit building coming to Wisconsin just above Brandywine:
http://www.urbaninvestmentpartners.com/project/broadcast/
The 100 units at 4000 Brandywine have been leasing for a while:
http://www.urbaninvestmentpartners.com/project/4000brandywine/
41-unit building coming to the Dancing Crab/Tenley Gastropub site:
https://dc.urbanturf.com/pipeline/755/Dancing_Crab_Redevelopment
So basically any parcel with a new building is a "new development zone"?
And a six story building, with a few dozen units, is "massive"?
Well in DC we have and continue to have apartment buildings go in as new development zones, including along Wisconsin Ave., obviously the ballpark etc. I'm confused where the Mayor would put 1,500 more units (as a fraction of other units? Or self contained?) in rock creek park west. Once you get off the main roads its all single family and duplex.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How is it a crisis if there is tons of affordable housing in VA and Md with easy city access?
I live in Va and I am not sure what the hell you are talking about. We had a similar housing shortage here, even before Amazon and its getting worse. Arlington and Alexandria are facing substantial loss of market rate affordable units, and are both scrambling to create/preserve committed affordable units. There is also activity to create AH in Falls Church and Fairfax, and this was a big issue in the recent Board of Supervisors election in Fairfax County. To address shortages at higher income levels, there is massive new construction across NoVa, some in Alexandria, more in Arlington, some in Falls Church, and in several parts of Fairfax (and now even Loudoun and PWC are doing transit oriented development). Plus easy city access is questionable, and with highways maxed out major new transit investments are needed.
So you probably really mean Maryland. But when you look closer you will see MoCo has the same issues as NoVa. So you really mean PG County. So we are talking about the old solution, send the poors to PG.
But as you will note even parts of PG (like Hyattsville) are getting gentrified. And of course most of PG does not have great access - it has poor access to its metro stops, and congested highways.
So really you mean a relatively small area within walking distance of the PG metro stations.
Most of which are filled with existing SFHs, which are occupied by families.
Are they putting high rises in the middle of single family home neighborhoods in places like Falls Church, or in new developments or along major thoroughfares with apartment buildings?
Depends what you mean by "in the middle of" Falls Church they are mostly on Washington and on Broad - not at all far from detached SFHs (and right across the street from THs)
In Rosslyn - Ballston in North Arlington the County has created a buffer of THs between the denser apts and detached SFHs. No such buffer along Columbia Pike, but the height there is more limited.
Could you give an example from DC of what you mean?
Well in DC we have and continue to have apartment buildings go in as new development zones, including along Wisconsin Ave., obviously the ballpark etc. I'm confused where the Mayor would put 1,500 more units (as a fraction of other units? Or self contained?) in rock creek park west. Once you get off the main roads its all single family and duplex.[/quote
What "new development zones" are you referring to? There is no such thing actually but maybe you could articulate what it is you think you are saying?
Aside from the Fannie Mae project very few new projects have been built or are even planned for Wisconsin Avenue.
But there is definitely room for additional development on Wisconsin Avenue - lots of surface parking lots and 3-4 story 50-60 year old buildings that are near the end of their useful life. And there are some lots on Upper CT as well though not many.
But it is not that hard to get several thousand new units in Rock Creek West though it is an open question how the mayor will get her affordable housing units which the free market alone will not yield.
This is patently untrue, pure Greater Greater Washington propaganda.
There's Fannie Mae, and there's the massive, 716-unit residential/retail development coming directly to the north of it:
https://www.skiarch.com/projects/4000-wisconsin-avenue/
There's a planned six-story apartment building at Wisconsin and Macomb:
https://www.bisnow.com/washington-dc/news/multifamily/six-story-apartment-building-planned-to-replace-single-family-home-on-wisconsin-avenue-corner-98491
146-unit building coming to Wisconsin just above Brandywine:
http://www.urbaninvestmentpartners.com/project/broadcast/
The 100 units at 4000 Brandywine have been leasing for a while:
http://www.urbaninvestmentpartners.com/project/4000brandywine/
41-unit building coming to the Dancing Crab/Tenley Gastropub site:
https://dc.urbanturf.com/pipeline/755/Dancing_Crab_Redevelopment
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:owseAnonymous wrote:Mayor Muriel Marion Barry Bowser, big developers’ best friend and fixer.
Again with this.
I don't like Bowser at all but please explain in what manner rent controlled units are being threatened by developers or any Bowser policies?
Maybe you can offer a citation?
Or even a theory? Even a conspiracy theory at this point would be better than the arguments posited in this thread.
Have you ever had a problem with a developer? Just try to get the city to help you. It is impossible.
DCRA has long been terrible at taking enforcement action against any property owners so your complaint doesn't really prove anything.
And unsurprisingly no one chimed in to try to explain this grand pro-developer anti rent controlled conspiracy the Mayor is somehow engineering.
It seems like a ridiculous question. Bowser is profoundly pro-developer. Do you even live in DC?
Yes I do.
And I happen to know quite a bit about how zoning works in DC and how developments that require approval wind their way through the system.
How is Bowser "profoundly pro-developer"
Her proposed changes to the Comp Plan are actually pretty modest given the housing and global warming crises we are facing.
And she doesn't control the Zoning Commision, the BZA or the Courts which is where all relevant decisions are actually made.
I get that her plan to build homeless shelters across the city was terribly conceived and wasteful and clearly benefitted people connected to her and she deserves criticism for that but that plan had nothing whatsoever to do with the boom in housing we are seeing in some neighborhoods.
FWIW I don't like Bowser and wish the city were adding more housing than it is.
I'll check back for a substantive response.
I don't mean to be rude, but you sound like you know nothing about any of this. If you have a problem with a developer, no one on the city council will help you because Bowser has laid down the law, i.e. they support developers. Don't believe me? Try it. Ask your representative for help on something -- anything. They won't lift a finger if helping you would mean hurting a developer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How is it a crisis if there is tons of affordable housing in VA and Md with easy city access?
I live in Va and I am not sure what the hell you are talking about. We had a similar housing shortage here, even before Amazon and its getting worse. Arlington and Alexandria are facing substantial loss of market rate affordable units, and are both scrambling to create/preserve committed affordable units. There is also activity to create AH in Falls Church and Fairfax, and this was a big issue in the recent Board of Supervisors election in Fairfax County. To address shortages at higher income levels, there is massive new construction across NoVa, some in Alexandria, more in Arlington, some in Falls Church, and in several parts of Fairfax (and now even Loudoun and PWC are doing transit oriented development). Plus easy city access is questionable, and with highways maxed out major new transit investments are needed.
So you probably really mean Maryland. But when you look closer you will see MoCo has the same issues as NoVa. So you really mean PG County. So we are talking about the old solution, send the poors to PG.
But as you will note even parts of PG (like Hyattsville) are getting gentrified. And of course most of PG does not have great access - it has poor access to its metro stops, and congested highways.
So really you mean a relatively small area within walking distance of the PG metro stations.
Most of which are filled with existing SFHs, which are occupied by families.
Are they putting high rises in the middle of single family home neighborhoods in places like Falls Church, or in new developments or along major thoroughfares with apartment buildings?
Depends what you mean by "in the middle of" Falls Church they are mostly on Washington and on Broad - not at all far from detached SFHs (and right across the street from THs)
In Rosslyn - Ballston in North Arlington the County has created a buffer of THs between the denser apts and detached SFHs. No such buffer along Columbia Pike, but the height there is more limited.
Could you give an example from DC of what you mean?
Well in DC we have and continue to have apartment buildings go in as new development zones, including along Wisconsin Ave., obviously the ballpark etc. I'm confused where the Mayor would put 1,500 more units (as a fraction of other units? Or self contained?) in rock creek park west. Once you get off the main roads its all single family and duplex.[/quote
What "new development zones" are you referring to? There is no such thing actually but maybe you could articulate what it is you think you are saying?
Aside from the Fannie Mae project very few new projects have been built or are even planned for Wisconsin Avenue.
But there is definitely room for additional development on Wisconsin Avenue - lots of surface parking lots and 3-4 story 50-60 year old buildings that are near the end of their useful life. And there are some lots on Upper CT as well though not many.
But it is not that hard to get several thousand new units in Rock Creek West though it is an open question how the mayor will get her affordable housing units which the free market alone will not yield.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How is it a crisis if there is tons of affordable housing in VA and Md with easy city access?
I live in Va and I am not sure what the hell you are talking about. We had a similar housing shortage here, even before Amazon and its getting worse. Arlington and Alexandria are facing substantial loss of market rate affordable units, and are both scrambling to create/preserve committed affordable units. There is also activity to create AH in Falls Church and Fairfax, and this was a big issue in the recent Board of Supervisors election in Fairfax County. To address shortages at higher income levels, there is massive new construction across NoVa, some in Alexandria, more in Arlington, some in Falls Church, and in several parts of Fairfax (and now even Loudoun and PWC are doing transit oriented development). Plus easy city access is questionable, and with highways maxed out major new transit investments are needed.
So you probably really mean Maryland. But when you look closer you will see MoCo has the same issues as NoVa. So you really mean PG County. So we are talking about the old solution, send the poors to PG.
But as you will note even parts of PG (like Hyattsville) are getting gentrified. And of course most of PG does not have great access - it has poor access to its metro stops, and congested highways.
So really you mean a relatively small area within walking distance of the PG metro stations.
Most of which are filled with existing SFHs, which are occupied by families.
Are they putting high rises in the middle of single family home neighborhoods in places like Falls Church, or in new developments or along major thoroughfares with apartment buildings?
Depends what you mean by "in the middle of" Falls Church they are mostly on Washington and on Broad - not at all far from detached SFHs (and right across the street from THs)
In Rosslyn - Ballston in North Arlington the County has created a buffer of THs between the denser apts and detached SFHs. No such buffer along Columbia Pike, but the height there is more limited.
Could you give an example from DC of what you mean?
Well in DC we have and continue to have apartment buildings go in as new development zones, including along Wisconsin Ave., obviously the ballpark etc. I'm confused where the Mayor would put 1,500 more units (as a fraction of other units? Or self contained?) in rock creek park west. Once you get off the main roads its all single family and duplex.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How is it a crisis if there is tons of affordable housing in VA and Md with easy city access?
I live in Va and I am not sure what the hell you are talking about. We had a similar housing shortage here, even before Amazon and its getting worse. Arlington and Alexandria are facing substantial loss of market rate affordable units, and are both scrambling to create/preserve committed affordable units. There is also activity to create AH in Falls Church and Fairfax, and this was a big issue in the recent Board of Supervisors election in Fairfax County. To address shortages at higher income levels, there is massive new construction across NoVa, some in Alexandria, more in Arlington, some in Falls Church, and in several parts of Fairfax (and now even Loudoun and PWC are doing transit oriented development). Plus easy city access is questionable, and with highways maxed out major new transit investments are needed.
So you probably really mean Maryland. But when you look closer you will see MoCo has the same issues as NoVa. So you really mean PG County. So we are talking about the old solution, send the poors to PG.
But as you will note even parts of PG (like Hyattsville) are getting gentrified. And of course most of PG does not have great access - it has poor access to its metro stops, and congested highways.
So really you mean a relatively small area within walking distance of the PG metro stations.
Most of which are filled with existing SFHs, which are occupied by families.
Are they putting high rises in the middle of single family home neighborhoods in places like Falls Church, or in new developments or along major thoroughfares with apartment buildings?
Depends what you mean by "in the middle of" Falls Church they are mostly on Washington and on Broad - not at all far from detached SFHs (and right across the street from THs)
In Rosslyn - Ballston in North Arlington the County has created a buffer of THs between the denser apts and detached SFHs. No such buffer along Columbia Pike, but the height there is more limited.
Could you give an example from DC of what you mean?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How is it a crisis if there is tons of affordable housing in VA and Md with easy city access?
I live in Va and I am not sure what the hell you are talking about. We had a similar housing shortage here, even before Amazon and its getting worse. Arlington and Alexandria are facing substantial loss of market rate affordable units, and are both scrambling to create/preserve committed affordable units. There is also activity to create AH in Falls Church and Fairfax, and this was a big issue in the recent Board of Supervisors election in Fairfax County. To address shortages at higher income levels, there is massive new construction across NoVa, some in Alexandria, more in Arlington, some in Falls Church, and in several parts of Fairfax (and now even Loudoun and PWC are doing transit oriented development). Plus easy city access is questionable, and with highways maxed out major new transit investments are needed.
So you probably really mean Maryland. But when you look closer you will see MoCo has the same issues as NoVa. So you really mean PG County. So we are talking about the old solution, send the poors to PG.
But as you will note even parts of PG (like Hyattsville) are getting gentrified. And of course most of PG does not have great access - it has poor access to its metro stops, and congested highways.
So really you mean a relatively small area within walking distance of the PG metro stations.
Most of which are filled with existing SFHs, which are occupied by families.
Are they putting high rises in the middle of single family home neighborhoods in places like Falls Church, or in new developments or along major thoroughfares with apartment buildings?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:owseAnonymous wrote:Mayor Muriel Marion Barry Bowser, big developers’ best friend and fixer.
Again with this.
I don't like Bowser at all but please explain in what manner rent controlled units are being threatened by developers or any Bowser policies?
Maybe you can offer a citation?
Or even a theory? Even a conspiracy theory at this point would be better than the arguments posited in this thread.
Have you ever had a problem with a developer? Just try to get the city to help you. It is impossible.
DCRA has long been terrible at taking enforcement action against any property owners so your complaint doesn't really prove anything.
And unsurprisingly no one chimed in to try to explain this grand pro-developer anti rent controlled conspiracy the Mayor is somehow engineering.
It seems like a ridiculous question. Bowser is profoundly pro-developer. Do you even live in DC?
Yes I do.
And I happen to know quite a bit about how zoning works in DC and how developments that require approval wind their way through the system.
How is Bowser "profoundly pro-developer"
Her proposed changes to the Comp Plan are actually pretty modest given the housing and global warming crises we are facing.
And she doesn't control the Zoning Commision, the BZA or the Courts which is where all relevant decisions are actually made.
I get that her plan to build homeless shelters across the city was terribly conceived and wasteful and clearly benefitted people connected to her and she deserves criticism for that but that plan had nothing whatsoever to do with the boom in housing we are seeing in some neighborhoods.
FWIW I don't like Bowser and wish the city were adding more housing than it is.
I'll check back for a substantive response.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:owseAnonymous wrote:Mayor Muriel Marion Barry Bowser, big developers’ best friend and fixer.
Again with this.
I don't like Bowser at all but please explain in what manner rent controlled units are being threatened by developers or any Bowser policies?
Maybe you can offer a citation?
Or even a theory? Even a conspiracy theory at this point would be better than the arguments posited in this thread.
Have you ever had a problem with a developer? Just try to get the city to help you. It is impossible.
DCRA has long been terrible at taking enforcement action against any property owners so your complaint doesn't really prove anything.
And unsurprisingly no one chimed in to try to explain this grand pro-developer anti rent controlled conspiracy the Mayor is somehow engineering.
It seems like a ridiculous question. Bowser is profoundly pro-developer. Do you even live in DC?
Yes I do.
And I happen to know quite a bit about how zoning works in DC and how developments that require approval wind their way through the system.
How is Bowser "profoundly pro-developer"
Her proposed changes to the Comp Plan are actually pretty modest given the housing and global warming crises we are facing.
And she doesn't control the Zoning Commision, the BZA or the Courts which is where all relevant decisions are actually made.
I get that her plan to build homeless shelters across the city was terribly conceived and wasteful and clearly benefitted people connected to her and she deserves criticism for that but that plan had nothing whatsoever to do with the boom in housing we are seeing in some neighborhoods.
FWIW I don't like Bowser and wish the city were adding more housing than it is.
I'll check back for a substantive response.