Anonymous wrote:That's tragic, but this isn't a unique case, unfortunately. It's happened in the US as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UK has sent an extradition notice for Sacoolas to Justice Dept. Response will be interesting.
Wow! Should be interesting. Will justice ever be served here?
Anonymous wrote:UK has sent an extradition notice for Sacoolas to Justice Dept. Response will be interesting.
Anonymous wrote:UK’s Crown Prosecution Service has charged Sacoolas with death by dangerous driving.
But State Department says her extradition to UK would be “an egregious abuse”. Anyone from State care to talk us through exactly where abuse of the system lies?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The double standard between this thread and the cruise line grandpa thread (off topic) is astonishing. I’m following both.
So many over there think his remorse is enough/no charges needed. Over here, not so much.
In both cases, someone got dead because someone did something careless/reckless. Why the double standard?
You honestly don't get the difference between death by a stranger versus a relative?
Huh? WTF is the difference?
The difference in blame. Sure they both did something careless. But the family wants to blame someone, and blaming a stranger is much easier than blaming a relative. So if you as the relative are responsible some people feel that is punishment enough. I think it's a greater degree of agony. You might feel horrible about killing someone you didn't know, but devastated if you killed your granddaughter and have to see her parents all of the time with everyone knowing you were responsible.
Now you tell me why it's the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We don’t decide legal punishments in this country based upon how much agony the perpetrator feels. Good grief.
We don't? Why are there victim impact statements? If the victim pleads clemency to the perpetrator is that not taken in consideration in the sentencing?
Anonymous wrote:We don’t decide legal punishments in this country based upon how much agony the perpetrator feels. Good grief.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The double standard between this thread and the cruise line grandpa thread (off topic) is astonishing. I’m following both.
So many over there think his remorse is enough/no charges needed. Over here, not so much.
In both cases, someone got dead because someone did something careless/reckless. Why the double standard?
You honestly don't get the difference between death by a stranger versus a relative?
Huh? WTF is the difference?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The double standard between this thread and the cruise line grandpa thread (off topic) is astonishing. I’m following both.
So many over there think his remorse is enough/no charges needed. Over here, not so much.
In both cases, someone got dead because someone did something careless/reckless. Why the double standard?
You honestly don't get the difference between death by a stranger versus a relative?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The double standard between this thread and the cruise line grandpa thread (off topic) is astonishing. I’m following both.
So many over there think his remorse is enough/no charges needed. Over here, not so much.
In both cases, someone got dead because someone did something careless/reckless. Why the double standard?
You honestly don't get the difference between death by a stranger versus a relative?