Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pp you need to take a breath. No one is saying its just one groups thing. Not sure where you are getting that from. It is a possible motive for a random violent attack. As you proved above.

Far from worked up no pause to "take a breath" needed. I simply decided to point out to the previous posters in this thread who were insistent about pushing the narrative that it’s primarily a “black thing” to be intolerant of gays and that it's mainly a “black thing” to use violence against people who don’t subscribe to heteronormative ideals and gender roles that they are WRONG. Intolerance is a human thing and violence is a human thing meaning it's pervasive among all races and all ethnicities and it's worldwide. Just two weeks ago an angry mob was throwing bricks, stones, and fireworks at marchers in the first gay pride parade in Bialystock, Poland and it damn sure wadn't a mob full of black folks.

Nobody said "primarily". You inserted that and then have been arguing against it ever since.

So in your slick little circuitous way you’re saying it’s not a “black thing” primarily and that the white community also has a culture of intolerance of gays and a predilection towards violence against people who don’t subscribe to heteronormative ideals and gender roles.
Thank you.

Anonymous wrote:Well if y'all wanna push a narrative that it’s a “black thing” to be intolerant of gays and it’s a “black thing” to use violence against people who don’t subscribe to heteronormative ideals and gender roles, fine.
Believe whatever you want.
I'm gonna push the narrative that intolerance is a human thing and violence against people who don’t subscribe to heteronormative ideals and gender roles is a human thing based on the homophobic attack on two lesbian women who were assaulted and robbed on the top of a double-decker bus in North London in June by five white teenagers ages 15 to 18.
I'm gonna believe what I want.

This happened in London LOLZZZ

I guess that proves that homophobia doesnt exist in the AA community

I don't really blame you because dems support both groups.... so what to do lol

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pp you need to take a breath. No one is saying its just one groups thing. Not sure where you are getting that from. It is a possible motive for a random violent attack. As you proved above.

Far from worked up no pause to "take a breath" needed. I simply decided to point out to the previous posters in this thread who were insistent about pushing the narrative that it’s primarily a “black thing” to be intolerant of gays and that it's mainly a “black thing” to use violence against people who don’t subscribe to heteronormative ideals and gender roles that they are WRONG. Intolerance is a human thing and violence is a human thing meaning it's pervasive among all races and all ethnicities and it's worldwide. Just two weeks ago an angry mob was throwing bricks, stones, and fireworks at marchers in the first gay pride parade in Bialystock, Poland and it damn sure wadn't a mob full of black folks.

Nobody said "primarily". You inserted that and then have been arguing against it ever since.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:why would they attack them for being gay? It's DuPont, there's tons of gay people everywhere. Why attack just this guy?

How would we know??

Sadly, homophobia is still rampant in AA urban communities. Some are woke, and some are not.

I don’t understand the use of the term homophobia in this context. A large segment of the AA community hates the gays based on religious beliefs. Few are afraid of gays.

JFC, do you HEAR yourself?

Do you understand how racist you sound!?!?

DP. You don’t understand what racism means. The PP was simply articulating an objective FACT.

Facts are white.

Don't trust them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because of the racism, duh. The white nationalists who are jumping on this as a way to claim that black people are animals who should be shot or run from in fear.

Are you defending a bunch of teenage thugs for attacking a gay black man outside of a hotel just because they are black? Are you accusing others who find this unacceptable of being racists?? SMH.

No, that never happened. Just in your racist imagination.

So the video is just make believe and that DC is the land of lollipops, puppies and unicorns? Phew! Heading down to DC right now!

So where are you going to go? Where on the map have there been no crimes committed this year?

Anonymous wrote:Pp you need to take a breath. No one is saying its just one groups thing. Not sure where you are getting that from. It is a possible motive for a random violent attack. As you proved above.

Far from worked up no pause to "take a breath" needed. I simply decided to point out to the previous posters in this thread who were insistent about pushing the narrative that it’s primarily a “black thing” to be intolerant of gays and that it's mainly a “black thing” to use violence against people who don’t subscribe to heteronormative ideals and gender roles that they are WRONG. Intolerance is a human thing and violence is a human thing meaning it's pervasive among all races and all ethnicities and it's worldwide. Just two weeks ago an angry mob was throwing bricks, stones, and fireworks at marchers in the first gay pride parade in Bialystock, Poland and it damn sure wadn't a mob full of black folks.

Pp you need to take a breath. No one is saying its just one groups thing. Not sure where you are getting that from. It is a possible motive for a random violent attack. As you proved above.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well if y'all wanna push a narrative that it’s a “black thing” to be intolerant of gays and it’s a “black thing” to use violence against people who don’t subscribe to heteronormative ideals and gender roles, fine.
Believe whatever you want.
I'm gonna push the narrative that intolerance is a human thing and violence against people who don’t subscribe to heteronormative ideals and gender roles is a human thing based on the homophobic attack on two lesbian women who were assaulted and robbed on the top of a double-decker bus in North London in June by five white teenagers ages 15 to 18.
I'm gonna believe what I want.

So were they mugged or was it a hate attack?

Melania Geymonat and her girlfriend, Chris, were headed home after their date — grabbing seats on the top deck of a night bus in London.
Moments after sitting down, a group of young men began harassing them when they saw that the two women were a couple, asking them to kiss so that they could watch — even throwing coins at them. When Geymonat and Chris refused, the men proceeded to brutally attack the women, beating them until they were covered in blood, even stealing some of their belongings.

https://people.com/human-interest/gay-couple-attacked-on-bus-5-teens-arrested/

Sounds like a hate attack to me what do you think?

Well if y'all wanna push a narrative that it’s a “black thing” to be intolerant of gays and it’s a “black thing” to use violence against people who don’t subscribe to heteronormative ideals and gender roles, fine.
Believe whatever you want.
I'm gonna push the narrative that intolerance is a human thing and violence against people who don’t subscribe to heteronormative ideals and gender roles is a human thing based on the brutal beating of a gay couple in downtown Austin who were branded “f@**ots” before being kicked and punched to the ground by four NON-black men ages 20 to 22 in January.
I'm gonna believe what I want.

Anonymous wrote:Well if y'all wanna push a narrative that it’s a “black thing” to be intolerant of gays and it’s a “black thing” to use violence against people who don’t subscribe to heteronormative ideals and gender roles, fine.
Believe whatever you want.
I'm gonna push the narrative that intolerance is a human thing and violence against people who don’t subscribe to heteronormative ideals and gender roles is a human thing based on the homophobic attack on two lesbian women who were assaulted and robbed on the top of a double-decker bus in North London in June by five white teenagers ages 15 to 18.
I'm gonna believe what I want.

So were they mugged or was it a hate attack?

Well if y'all wanna push a narrative that it’s a “black thing” to be intolerant of gays and it’s a “black thing” to use violence against people who don’t subscribe to heteronormative ideals and gender roles, fine.
Believe whatever you want.
I'm gonna push the narrative that intolerance is a human thing and violence against people who don’t subscribe to heteronormative ideals and gender roles is a human thing based on the homophobic attack on two lesbian women who were assaulted and robbed on the top of a double-decker bus in North London in June by five white teenagers ages 15 to 18.
I'm gonna believe what I want.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:why would they attack them for being gay? It's DuPont, there's tons of gay people everywhere. Why attack just this guy?

How would we know??

Sadly, homophobia is still rampant in AA urban communities. Some are woke, and some are not.

I don’t understand the use of the term homophobia in this context. A large segment of the AA community hates the gays based on religious beliefs. Few are afraid of gays.

JFC, do you HEAR yourself?

Do you understand how racist you sound!?!?

DP. You don’t understand what racism means. The PP was simply articulating an objective FACT.

Facts are racist according to some loonie PPs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:why would they attack them for being gay? It's DuPont, there's tons of gay people everywhere. Why attack just this guy?

How would we know??

Sadly, homophobia is still rampant in AA urban communities. Some are woke, and some are not.

I don’t understand the use of the term homophobia in this context. A large segment of the AA community hates the gays based on religious beliefs. Few are afraid of gays.

JFC, do you HEAR yourself?

Do you understand how racist you sound!?!?

DP. You don’t understand what racism means. The PP was simply articulating an objective FACT.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:why would they attack them for being gay? It's DuPont, there's tons of gay people everywhere. Why attack just this guy?

How would we know??

Sadly, homophobia is still rampant in AA urban communities. Some are woke, and some are not.

I don’t understand the use of the term homophobia in this context. A large segment of the AA community hates the gays based on religious beliefs. Few are afraid of gays.

JFC, do you HEAR yourself?

Do you understand how racist you sound!?!?

The phrase “on the down low” exists for a reason.

That has what to do with anything?

The problem we’re here isn’t the AA community’s take on homosexuality, it’s your racism. Stop deflecting.

NP - Huh? There are endless tales in DC about black-on-gay verbal and physical abuse.

Was that the reason for the assault? Who told you? How do you know? Unless you have some conclusive evidence that the assault was predicated on hatred towards gays stop trying to push this argument.

You're talking to different people PP, and no one is pushing an argument. i personally hope there was a motive( even if unjustified), not randomly and savagely attacking? People are just wondering what the motive could ve. And there is a known challenge for gays in conservative AA christian communities, as in other conservative communities - not just xtian obvi. I say this both as a Christian and also friend to a black male in this predicament.

A known challenge for gays in conservative AA Christian communities, eh? Lol so your take on this incident is that those were young Sunday parishioners who jumped those guys cause for violating God’s word, is that it? Lawd y’all on whole ‘nother level with your audacity.

Fact is you don’t know what prompted it so lay off criticizing entire an community especially when (for the 5 billionth time) black people are not a monolith. It’s plenty of blacks out here who accept and respect homosexuality, especially young blacks today cause it’s no shortage of Gen-Z AA kids who proudly identify as LBGTQ and while intolerance still exists out here it’s among ALL RACES so stop stigmatizing black folks.

You must not know anyone from DC, from a conservative community, who is black and gay, and worried about being ostracized by their community. That's OK.

And you must not see anything wrong with blatant attempts to characterize and generalize the black community as being monolithic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:why would they attack them for being gay? It's DuPont, there's tons of gay people everywhere. Why attack just this guy?

How would we know??

Sadly, homophobia is still rampant in AA urban communities. Some are woke, and some are not.

I don’t understand the use of the term homophobia in this context. A large segment of the AA community hates the gays based on religious beliefs. Few are afraid of gays.

JFC, do you HEAR yourself?

Do you understand how racist you sound!?!?

The phrase “on the down low” exists for a reason.

That has what to do with anything?

The problem we’re here isn’t the AA community’s take on homosexuality, it’s your racism. Stop deflecting.

NP - Huh? There are endless tales in DC about black-on-gay verbal and physical abuse.

Was that the reason for the assault? Who told you? How do you know? Unless you have some conclusive evidence that the assault was predicated on hatred towards gays stop trying to push this argument.

You're talking to different people PP, and no one is pushing an argument. i personally hope there was a motive( even if unjustified), not randomly and savagely attacking? People are just wondering what the motive could ve. And there is a known challenge for gays in conservative AA christian communities, as in other conservative communities - not just xtian obvi. I say this both as a Christian and also friend to a black male in this predicament.

A known challenge for gays in conservative AA Christian communities, eh? Lol so your take on this incident is that those were young Sunday parishioners who jumped those guys cause for violating God’s word, is that it? Lawd y’all on whole ‘nother level with your audacity.

Fact is you don’t know what prompted it so lay off criticizing entire an community especially when (for the 5 billionth time) black people are not a monolith. It’s plenty of blacks out here who accept and respect homosexuality, especially young blacks today cause it’s no shortage of Gen-Z AA kids who proudly identify as LBGTQ and while intolerance still exists out here it’s among ALL RACES so stop stigmatizing black folks.

You must not know anyone from DC, from a conservative community, who is black and gay, and worried about being ostracized by their community. That's OK.