Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you but I am in boundary, with sibling preference and Spanish proficiency. It hurts to see that they accept whoever they want and that what they sell as a "rigorous admission process" is that a personal decision, not sure based on what. I am not so much interested in trying to appeal the decision as in making sure that the process becomes open and fair, which it is not at the moment. Glad to hear that parents are doing something and I believe that the more complaints they get, the more likely they are to be forced to do something. Will a lawyer help?
Probably not, but why don’t you hire a lawyer and see what happens. You won’t be the first person to (unsuccessfully) sue Oyster because you don’t like the admissions result.
You’re also NOT an IB parent.
On the bright side, you may be better off staying away from Oyster the upcoming year as there will be changes that nobody can explain to you (90% Spanish copy cat from Marie Reed for instance). Do I want my child to be a guinea pig? I attended a parent meeting for kinder and decided to look for another school. My IB friend has not made up her mind either and parents who know about language learning will have doubts. Watch the spots for changes and report back....
Oyster’s switch to a 90/10 (Spanish/English) model in PK4 and K is based on research and best practices: https://carla.umn.edu/immersion/acie/vol10/may2007_researchminority.html
“ELL students in 90:10 programs attain the same levels of proficiency in English and the same or higher standards of achievement in reading/language arts and math (measured in English) as ELL students in 50:50 programs. Thus, more exposure to instructional time in English does not lead to an improvement in English language proficiency or achievement in reading/language arts and math as measured in English.“
Btw, WIS follows the 90/10 model in PK and K as well. At WIS, 1st through 5th is 50/50.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you but I am in boundary, with sibling preference and Spanish proficiency. It hurts to see that they accept whoever they want and that what they sell as a "rigorous admission process" is that a personal decision, not sure based on what. I am not so much interested in trying to appeal the decision as in making sure that the process becomes open and fair, which it is not at the moment. Glad to hear that parents are doing something and I believe that the more complaints they get, the more likely they are to be forced to do something. Will a lawyer help?
Probably not, but why don’t you hire a lawyer and see what happens. You won’t be the first person to (unsuccessfully) sue Oyster because you don’t like the admissions result.
You’re also NOT an IB parent.
On the bright side, you may be better off staying away from Oyster the upcoming year as there will be changes that nobody can explain to you (90% Spanish copy cat from Marie Reed for instance). Do I want my child to be a guinea pig? I attended a parent meeting for kinder and decided to look for another school. My IB friend has not made up her mind either and parents who know about language learning will have doubts. Watch the spots for changes and report back....
Anonymous wrote:But why not 100%? Or why did the prior post make it seem like a change? Just don’t follow if it is new.
Anonymous wrote:Can you explain this 90% Spanish thing? Is that for kinder?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you but I am in boundary, with sibling preference and Spanish proficiency. It hurts to see that they accept whoever they want and that what they sell as a "rigorous admission process" is that a personal decision, not sure based on what. I am not so much interested in trying to appeal the decision as in making sure that the process becomes open and fair, which it is not at the moment. Glad to hear that parents are doing something and I believe that the more complaints they get, the more likely they are to be forced to do something. Will a lawyer help?
Probably not, but why don’t you hire a lawyer and see what happens. You won’t be the first person to (unsuccessfully) sue Oyster because you don’t like the admissions result.
You’re also NOT an IB parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok. Maybe was not the previous one. I was told about one who accepted children of diplomas only and had to be stopped. I was referring to that one. But is not the point. The point is that we need a fair process in the face of preferential treatment for whatever reason.
"I was told about one..."
You deal in rumor and innuendo like the rest of the posters, who are not Oyster parents, on this thread. You do NOT have any first hand knowledge of what's going on at Oyster, and your information is wrong.
But please hire a lawyer to get to the bottom of this "conspiracy," and waste your time and money.
Anonymous wrote:I believe it's totally possible that two children, each with 1 native Spanish speaking parent and 1 native English speaking parent, could have different levels of Spanish fluency.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, 5 ways to get in: 1. Fluent Spanish speaker with 2 native Spanish speakers at home 2. Talk nicely to Berrocal or PP 3. Ask Berrocal or PP for a second chance (private interview in which they do whatever they want) 4. Get a teacher to help you. 5. Get a lawyer to uncover a few things of the internal process.
Anonymous wrote:.....
Anonymous wrote:Thank you but I am in boundary, with sibling preference and Spanish proficiency. It hurts to see that they accept whoever they want and that what they sell as a "rigorous admission process" is that a personal decision, not sure based on what. I am not so much interested in trying to appeal the decision as in making sure that the process becomes open and fair, which it is not at the moment. Glad to hear that parents are doing something and I believe that the more complaints they get, the more likely they are to be forced to do something. Will a lawyer help?
Anonymous wrote:I think a lawyer will be really helpful. The previous Principal lost his/her job for choosing who to accept. This one is doing the same thing but with different criteria. It will be not too long before someone with money chooses to do something about it.
Anonymous wrote:This thread is ridiculous.
OP, is it possible that your child, who sounds truly bilingual, panicked during the test and was not able to demonstrate a level of Spanish dominance that resulted in a passing score of whatever the test is?
I get the concern regarding transparency of the test itself, but in this area, if DCPS were to make the content of the test known, inevitably some parent would spend a bunch of time coaching their child to pass the test without regard to actual Spanish dominance.