Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's a total *ss. She's okay to talk to. I'm sorry they're divorcing but no amount of money would ever be worth being married to that guy. He has no manners and is completely gauche. That isn't a reflection on his background, it is a reflection on his narcissism.

Um ok, random anonymous person on the Internet. We'll take your word for it.

Better than yours. At least I've met them all. You're basing your opinion on what you read in the tabloids. He is an *ss. Completely boring to talk to with a very limited range of topical subjects. She's fine. The anchor woman looks even more weird in person than on tv because her head is too big for her body and none of her features move. I feel sorry for the children. All those adults looking out for themselves.

Yeah, whatever. Get quoted with your name on the record in a newspaper saying what you just said and we'll believe you. Otherwise, you're just a dopey concern troll making up that you've met famous people.

NP yup

NP here - I actually prefer reading the “insider scoop” even if s/he is just a troll insider to the ridiculous several pages long exchange between two wierdos about punctuation and grammar that had nothing to do with Bezos or his women (I was this close to hitting “report” button on them!)

So, please, Mr(s) Insider tell us more about that gauche Jeff and his plastic anchor passion!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's a total *ss. She's okay to talk to. I'm sorry they're divorcing but no amount of money would ever be worth being married to that guy. He has no manners and is completely gauche. That isn't a reflection on his background, it is a reflection on his narcissism.

Um ok, random anonymous person on the Internet. We'll take your word for it.

Better than yours. At least I've met them all. You're basing your opinion on what you read in the tabloids. He is an *ss. Completely boring to talk to with a very limited range of topical subjects. She's fine. The anchor woman looks even more weird in person than on tv because her head is too big for her body and none of her features move. I feel sorry for the children. All those adults looking out for themselves.

Yeah, whatever. Get quoted with your name on the record in a newspaper saying what you just said and we'll believe you. Otherwise, you're just a dopey concern troll making up that you've met famous people.

NP yup

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t want to derail this into a Trump conversation, but Melania had a strong enough position these last few months to renegotiate her agreement and probably got $20M or so to stay, a la Annette Lauer.

with what that woman has seen and heard, I'm sure she could renegotiate to get 90% of Trump's assets including the gold toilet.

Anonymous wrote:I don’t want to derail this into a Trump conversation, but Melania had a strong enough position these last few months to renegotiate her agreement and probably got $20M or so to stay, a la Annette Lauer.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would say she got a good return on her investment.

Same. She's tall and thin. She can spend a little money and bring her looks way up, and then she's the world's richest woman, attractive and not that old. Her life will be whatever she wants. She's probably hurt but a woman who knows enough at 23 to bag a rich dude will be just fine. Wish I had been as smart as her when I was her age.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, the news anchor wasn't even particularly attractive before the PS. MacKenzie unattractive but has improved with money. and certainly perfectly matched lookswise for him. They shared a life together, built a company, 4 kids...he comes out of this looking like a major jerk.

It doesn't matter. From what the tabloids are printing, he was obsessed with her sexually. Maybe this older, stripper looking woman f***s his brains out the right way.

Im in my 30s but why are ppl calling 49 old? Its young. My relatives are approaching their 90s and have the spirit and energy of a 20 yr old. 90 yr old granny is first on the dance floor and my 60ish relative is dating guys 20 or 30 yrs younger. We are latino though so age is just a number.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would say she got a good return on her investment.

Same. She's tall and thin. She can spend a little money and bring her looks way up, and then she's the world's richest woman, attractive and not that old. Her life will be whatever she wants. She's probably hurt but a woman who knows enough at 23 to bag a rich dude will be just fine. Wish I had been as smart as her when I was her age.

When it comes to her looks this is as good as it will ever get lol.She couldn’t even get a boob job done right , I cringe at the thought of what might happen should she push the envelope a little too far in an attempt to ‘keep up’. Take your half , raise your kids and kept it moving .

Boob jobs are subjective. Depends on your breast shape and how they look now and if you choose a really good doctot who can place them righ
t . Also depends on how much fat you already have. Skinny women like beckham or mackenzie don't get as good of a boob job.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would say she got a good return on her investment.

Same. She's tall and thin. She can spend a little money and bring her looks way up, and then she's the world's richest woman, attractive and not that old. Her life will be whatever she wants. She's probably hurt but a woman who knows enough at 23 to bag a rich dude will be just fine. Wish I had been as smart as her when I was her age.

When it comes to her looks this is as good as it will ever get lol.She couldn’t even get a boob job done right , I cringe at the thought of what might happen should she push the envelope a little too far in an attempt to ‘keep up’. Take your half , raise your kids and kept it moving .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’ll be interesting to see if she takes up with an Adrian Fenty type.

What is an "Adrian Fenty type"?

NP youngish , athletic and better ‘stamina ‘ I suppose

I thought it was an obama type. Tall dashing black man in politics.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would say she got a good return on her investment.

Same. She's tall and thin. She can spend a little money and bring her looks way up, and then she's the world's richest woman, attractive and not that old. Her life will be whatever she wants. She's probably hurt but a woman who knows enough at 23 to bag a rich dude will be just fine. Wish I had been as smart as her when I was her age.

When it comes to her looks this is as good as it will ever get lol.She couldn’t even get a boob job done right , I cringe at the thought of what might happen should she push the envelope a little too far in an attempt to ‘keep up’. Take your half , raise your kids and kept it moving .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’ll be interesting to see if she takes up with an Adrian Fenty type.

What is an "Adrian Fenty type"?

NP youngish , athletic and better ‘stamina ‘ I suppose

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, the news anchor wasn't even particularly attractive before the PS. MacKenzie unattractive but has improved with money. and certainly perfectly matched lookswise for him. They shared a life together, built a company, 4 kids...he comes out of this looking like a major jerk.

It doesn't matter. From what the tabloids are printing, he was obsessed with her sexually. Maybe this older, stripper looking woman f***s his brains out the right way.