Anonymous wrote:Have you been to Hoawrd Law lately? But more importantly do you know where the Banneker site sits in relation to Howard University?
There's nothing racist in wondering whether Howard U might covet land directly across the street from it more than land in the backwaters of Van Ness. Did you even think your rant through before you jumped to your conclusions?
But yes, UDC can't be moved for a whole host of political and perception reasons - but there's nicer ways to tell people that, because if you haven't noticed, a lot of people here are relatively new to the city and don't know the local history.
Anonymous wrote:Have you been to Hoawrd Law lately? But more importantly do you know where the Banneker site sits in relation to Howard University?
There's nothing racist in wondering whether Howard U might covet land directly across the street from it more than land in the backwaters of Van Ness. Did you even think your rant through before you jumped to your conclusions?
But yes, UDC can't be moved for a whole host of political and perception reasons - but there's nicer ways to tell people that, because if you haven't noticed, a lot of people here are relatively new to the city and don't know the local history.
Anonymous wrote:Have DCPS buy the old Intelsat building in Van Ness. Put a HS there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something centered around swapping part of Howard Law for old Banneker might work, although I would hope to save that site for another magnet school.
Finding real estate is the easy part! Have you met the groups of people this satisfies?
What about moving UDC, which hardly has any students in Ward 3? That large parcel could be a great site for several schools, recreational facilities and redevelopment along Conn. Ave. Mayor Williams proposed moving UDC to the St. Elizabeths campus to be closer to the population that UDC serves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:End the oob feeder rights for starters.
It only happened 10 years ago, with Michelle Rhee.
Before that, everyone oob from feeder elementaries had to enter the lottery. Melissa Kim, the Deal principal in those days, believed in kids moving up with their classmates but she kept control of the numbers.
Michelle Rhee changed all that in one moment.
I wouldn’t end OOB feeder rights outright. Instead DCPS should condition the OOB ability to progress on to Deal and Wilson based on grades, test scores and a satisfactory conduct record. It’s a way of saying that DC has invested in certain kids by giving them a sought-after place in a Deal feeder. So then the student has to show that the investment has been worthwhile before DCPS doubles down on that investment. Take some of the spots held by the kids who are weeded out and give other OOB kids the chance at Deal, those who have demonstrated by their records that they will work hard and follow the rules.
Why do you assume that OOB students don't have good grades, test scores, good conduct?
DCPS is a public school system, not a private school. DCPS already has rules that if you are excessively truant or have excessive absences you can lose your OOB privileges. That is more than enough conditions.
Anonymous wrote:School 1: Brightwood, Janney, Lafayette, March, Powell, Shepherd and West
School 2: Bancroft, Cooke, Eaton, Hearst, Hyde, Marie Reed, Mann, Oyster-Adams, and Stoddert
Both would be around 500 a class
How does this not work? It checks the most positive blocks and the least amount of negative ones. Each has diversity. Each has a highly educated population. Each brings in currently underserved but growing areas. It's geographically sound. It's hugely symbolic by uniting both sides of the park. Each increases resident and student retention. Each increases property values. Each has schools with available OOB spots. Each would be filled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School 1: Brightwood, Janney, Lafayette, March, Powell, Shepherd and West
School 2: Bancroft, Cooke, Eaton, Hearst, Hyde, Marie Reed, Mann, Oyster-Adams, and Stoddert
Both would be around 500 a class
How does this not work? It checks the most positive blocks and the least amount of negative ones. Each has diversity. Each has a highly educated population. Each brings in currently underserved but growing areas. It's geographically sound. It's hugely symbolic by uniting both sides of the park. Each increases resident and student retention. Each increases property values. Each has schools with available OOB spots. Each would be filled.
Sounds good, where would you put #2?
Anonymous wrote:Something centered around swapping part of Howard Law for old Banneker might work, although I would hope to save that site for another magnet school.
Finding real estate is the easy part! Have you met the groups of people this satisfies?
Anonymous wrote:I would love my DC to attend Banneker but I worry about being one of only a few non AA kids in the class. Similar situation in Pre-K (mostly Spanish speaking Hispanic kids) and DC was very lonely. Hope the school becomes more diverse because academics seem top notch
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School 1: Brightwood, Janney, Lafayette, March, Powell, Shepherd and West
School 2: Bancroft, Cooke, Eaton, Hearst, Hyde, Marie Reed, Mann, Oyster-Adams, and Stoddert
Both would be around 500 a class
How does this not work? It checks the most positive blocks and the least amount of negative ones. Each has diversity. Each has a highly educated population. Each brings in currently underserved but growing areas. It's geographically sound. It's hugely symbolic by uniting both sides of the park. Each increases resident and student retention. Each increases property values. Each has schools with available OOB spots. Each would be filled.
Sounds good, where would you put #2?
Anonymous wrote:School 1: Brightwood, Janney, Lafayette, March, Powell, Shepherd and West
School 2: Bancroft, Cooke, Eaton, Hearst, Hyde, Marie Reed, Mann, Oyster-Adams, and Stoddert
Both would be around 500 a class
How does this not work? It checks the most positive blocks and the least amount of negative ones. Each has diversity. Each has a highly educated population. Each brings in currently underserved but growing areas. It's geographically sound. It's hugely symbolic by uniting both sides of the park. Each increases resident and student retention. Each increases property values. Each has schools with available OOB spots. Each would be filled.