Anonymous wrote:Maybe it's Kushner. Lol
Anonymous wrote:Sessions?
Anonymous wrote:Sessions?
Anonymous wrote:Do not think it is Haley.
It was all over the news tonight (YES, MSNBC, CNN) that the Times would NOT have run with this if the source were not very, very, very high up. This is unprecedented.
I think someone is setting Pence up with "Lodestar" - certainly he could not be THAT dumb to use his go-to coin word?
Also, everyone is accusing "him" . . . could it be . . . a "SHE?"
BETSY DEVOS???? NO WAY. Not smart enough to pen that.
To be fair I skipped a bunch of pages in the middle of this thread so I probably missed a bunch. But to the PP who guessed Mnuchin? I think not.
My guesses? Louise Linton OR Melania with help of a translator.
God Bless America.
Anonymous wrote:Do not think it is Haley.
It was all over the news tonight (YES, MSNBC, CNN) that the Times would NOT have run with this if the source were not very, very, very high up. This is unprecedented.
I think someone is setting Pence up with "Lodestar" - certainly he could not be THAT dumb to use his go-to coin word?
Also, everyone is accusing "him" . . . could it be . . . a "SHE?"
BETSY DEVOS???? NO WAY. Not smart enough to pen that.
To be fair I skipped a bunch of pages in the middle of this thread so I probably missed a bunch. But to the PP who guessed Mnuchin? I think not.
My guesses? Louise Linton OR Melania with help of a translator.
God Bless America.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sarah Huckabee Sanders
“Sander’s evangelical faith is her lodestar; according to her husband, Bryan Sanders”
https://theslot.jezebel.com/the-complicity-of-sarah-huckabee-sanders-1825597216
it is not this hillbilly cow.
I just love liberals. If the woman is a conservative, their appearance is fair game. But hands off if she's a liberal!![]()
Anonymous wrote:No way is it SHS. She doesn't have a role in any kind of policy making - she just spews the lies she is told.
Also no way it is Pence. I don't think he is capable of sounding so reasonable without invoking his faith. He is also conflicted and I don't think the NYT would/ should publish something like that from someone who clearly stands to benefit if 45 resigns/ is impeached.
I agree it's someone in more of a overall policy/ foreign policy or law enforcement type role. I would be very, very surprised if it were someone from the military - just too dangerous for them to go there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That was some of the most cowardly bullshit I have ever read. For one thing, Trump’s dumbass priorities are what his dumbass supporters voted for. Trying to dilute his actions is essentially an illegal coup. For another, if you feel the president cannot lead, you loudly resign en masse and say why. These jerks want us to think that they’re heroes when in reality their plan was to use Donald Trump to enact the policies they want. Now that he has proven to be batshit, they realize that working in his administration is going to be a stain on their resumes forever and so they are trying to spin it as being part of the “resistance” from within the White House.
Agree 100%.