Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Are the sub patterns really that limited for a team like Landon? Seems a little low if you consider 3 attack, 2 O middie lines, 2-3 DM, 1 LSM, 3 d-poles, 1 FOGO, 1 goalie for any given game. That gets you to around 18 already without ever subbing the attack, poles, or FOGO. Seems like the number that play would be more like 20-24 if you have that kind of depth. So just curious if the elite teams in the area really stick with only 17 ever playing real minutes?

you sir are reading way too much into this post.

If you are a parent, and are worried about little Johnny's playing time, you might want to consider why your son is even playing the sport in the first place.

Never understand the constant need on this thread to insult the parent/kid regarding playing lacrosse. People are allowed to ask questions and try to understand on how teams operate and have feelings with how coaches run their programs.

Anonymous wrote:

Are the sub patterns really that limited for a team like Landon? Seems a little low if you consider 3 attack, 2 O middie lines, 2-3 DM, 1 LSM, 3 d-poles, 1 FOGO, 1 goalie for any given game. That gets you to around 18 already without ever subbing the attack, poles, or FOGO. Seems like the number that play would be more like 20-24 if you have that kind of depth. So just curious if the elite teams in the area really stick with only 17 ever playing real minutes?

you sir are reading way too much into this post.

If you are a parent, and are worried about little Johnny's playing time, you might want to consider why your son is even playing the sport in the first place.

Anonymous wrote:

Are the sub patterns really that limited for a team like Landon? Seems a little low if you consider 3 attack, 2 O middie lines, 2-3 DM, 1 LSM, 3 d-poles, 1 FOGO, 1 goalie for any given game. That gets you to around 18 already without ever subbing the attack, poles, or FOGO. Seems like the number that play would be more like 20-24 if you have that kind of depth. So just curious if the elite teams in the area really stick with only 17 ever playing real minutes?

you sir are reading way too much into this post.

If you are a parent, and are worried about little Johnny's playing time, you might want to consider why your son is even playing the sport in the first place.

Are the sub patterns really that limited for a team like Landon? Seems a little low if you consider 3 attack, 2 O middie lines, 2-3 DM, 1 LSM, 3 d-poles, 1 FOGO, 1 goalie for any given game. That gets you to around 18 already without ever subbing the attack, poles, or FOGO. Seems like the number that play would be more like 20-24 if you have that kind of depth. So just curious if the elite teams in the area really stick with only 17 ever playing real minutes?

Anonymous wrote:Landon had 47 last year but only 17-18 ever played.

Anonymous wrote:Big win for Prep tonight!

Anonymous wrote:Landon had 47 last year but only 17-18 ever played.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The IAC will be down this year relatively to the recent past. Calvert Hall has a strong squad returning. Bullis will be good, but they had an exceptional run with their 2016, 17 & 18 classes.

Agree with most of your post. Bullis was exceptional in 2016 and 2017. Last year they were GOOD, not exceptional. If the Bullis administration hadn't sold their soul to bring in the STAB kid for one year, Bullis would have been average last year. The STAB kid was by far the best player on their team last year and maybe in the DC area. Too bad he only came in for one year as he was a hell of a player to watch. The DCE coaches have left Falls road, it will be interesting to see if this also has a coaching impact.

The IAC will be DOWN this year as a whole as will the entire DC region.

Inside Lacrosse 2019 Rankings

1. Salisbury (Conn.)
2. Culver (Ind.)
3. Hill Academy (Ont.)
4. Calvert Hall (Md.)
5. Ward Melville (N.Y.)
6. St. Anthony's (N.Y.)
7. Garden City (N.Y.)
8. Bullis (Md.)
9. Chaminade (N.Y.)
10. Gonzaga (D.C.)
11. Brunswick (Conn.)
12. Boys' Latin (Md.)
13. McDonogh (Md.)
14. Deerfield (Mass.)
15. Delbarton (N.J.)
16. Georgetown Prep (Md.)
17. Haverford (Pa.)
18. Gilman (Md.)
19. IMG Academy (Fla.)
20. La Salle (Pa.)
21. Darien (Conn.)
22. Victor (N.Y.)
23. Malvern Prep (Pa.)
24. St. Sebastian's (Mass.)
25. St. Mary's (Md.)

At this point 8 ranked teams in the DMV region...the most of any region

Is true that Gonzaga is carrying 40 players listed on their varsity lax roster - isn't that a bit much for one high school team?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The IAC will be down this year relatively to the recent past. Calvert Hall has a strong squad returning. Bullis will be good, but they had an exceptional run with their 2016, 17 & 18 classes.

Agree with most of your post. Bullis was exceptional in 2016 and 2017. Last year they were GOOD, not exceptional. If the Bullis administration hadn't sold their soul to bring in the STAB kid for one year, Bullis would have been average last year. The STAB kid was by far the best player on their team last year and maybe in the DC area. Too bad he only came in for one year as he was a hell of a player to watch. The DCE coaches have left Falls road, it will be interesting to see if this also has a coaching impact.

The IAC will be DOWN this year as a whole as will the entire DC region.

Inside Lacrosse 2019 Rankings

1. Salisbury (Conn.)
2. Culver (Ind.)
3. Hill Academy (Ont.)
4. Calvert Hall (Md.)
5. Ward Melville (N.Y.)
6. St. Anthony's (N.Y.)
7. Garden City (N.Y.)
8. Bullis (Md.)
9. Chaminade (N.Y.)
10. Gonzaga (D.C.)
11. Brunswick (Conn.)
12. Boys' Latin (Md.)
13. McDonogh (Md.)
14. Deerfield (Mass.)
15. Delbarton (N.J.)
16. Georgetown Prep (Md.)
17. Haverford (Pa.)
18. Gilman (Md.)
19. IMG Academy (Fla.)
20. La Salle (Pa.)
21. Darien (Conn.)
22. Victor (N.Y.)
23. Malvern Prep (Pa.)
24. St. Sebastian's (Mass.)
25. St. Mary's (Md.)

At this point 8 ranked teams in the DMV region...the most of any region

Is true that Gonzaga is carrying 40 players listed on their varsity lax roster - isn't that a bit much for one high school team?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The IAC will be down this year relatively to the recent past. Calvert Hall has a strong squad returning. Bullis will be good, but they had an exceptional run with their 2016, 17 & 18 classes.

Agree with most of your post. Bullis was exceptional in 2016 and 2017. Last year they were GOOD, not exceptional. If the Bullis administration hadn't sold their soul to bring in the STAB kid for one year, Bullis would have been average last year. The STAB kid was by far the best player on their team last year and maybe in the DC area. Too bad he only came in for one year as he was a hell of a player to watch. The DCE coaches have left Falls road, it will be interesting to see if this also has a coaching impact.

The IAC will be DOWN this year as a whole as will the entire DC region.

Inside Lacrosse 2019 Rankings

1. Salisbury (Conn.)
2. Culver (Ind.)
3. Hill Academy (Ont.)
4. Calvert Hall (Md.)
5. Ward Melville (N.Y.)
6. St. Anthony's (N.Y.)
7. Garden City (N.Y.)
8. Bullis (Md.)
9. Chaminade (N.Y.)
10. Gonzaga (D.C.)
11. Brunswick (Conn.)
12. Boys' Latin (Md.)
13. McDonogh (Md.)
14. Deerfield (Mass.)
15. Delbarton (N.J.)
16. Georgetown Prep (Md.)
17. Haverford (Pa.)
18. Gilman (Md.)
19. IMG Academy (Fla.)
20. La Salle (Pa.)
21. Darien (Conn.)
22. Victor (N.Y.)
23. Malvern Prep (Pa.)
24. St. Sebastian's (Mass.)
25. St. Mary's (Md.)

At this point 8 ranked teams in the DMV region...the most of any region

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PVI 7 Prep 6 was the final score of the scrimmage.

Prep twitter had it 5-5 at the end of 4. But nice try.

Yes, and since this isn’t soccer/hockey they actually kept playing a fifth quarter, which PVI scored first and would have won in regular season.

They continued to get kids reps until it was 7 to 6 final.

I’m guessing you’re a CNN and WashPo, half a story, type person too.