Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eh. As far back as this "feud" has gone on, there's really no one involved in the show who is on Team Kim as far as I can tell. Even Willie Garson and Evan Handler seemed pretty negative about Kim in this latest go-round. When no one comes out and takes your side other than "Blind Gossip", well...

You posted twice to make the same point that a gang on the outs with one woman means she’s by definition wrong. Because “sides” are legit if “everyone” is on one side.

Adults posting to support a bullying instinct are repellant.

?? This is the first time I posted in this thread, but whatever.

To assert that she was being "bullied" suits your narrative. Sometimes people are ostracized because they are toxic.

I won't assume to know what the truth is. You don't know the truth either, so get over yourself.

Anonymous wrote:Eh. As far back as this "feud" has gone on, there's really no one involved in the show who is on Team Kim as far as I can tell. Even Willie Garson and Evan Handler seemed pretty negative about Kim in this latest go-round. When no one comes out and takes your side other than "Blind Gossip", well...

Anonymous wrote:Eh. As far back as this "feud" has gone on, there's really no one involved in the show who is on Team Kim as far as I can tell. Even Willie Garson and Evan Handler seemed pretty negative about Kim in this latest go-round. When no one comes out and takes your side other than "Blind Gossip", well...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eh. As far back as this "feud" has gone on, there's really no one involved in the show who is on Team Kim as far as I can tell. Even Willie Garson and Evan Handler seemed pretty negative about Kim in this latest go-round. When no one comes out and takes your side other than "Blind Gossip", well...

You posted twice to make the same point that a gang on the outs with one woman means she’s by definition wrong. Because “sides” are legit if “everyone” is on one side.

Adults posting to support a bullying instinct are repellant.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Kim Cattrall is getting a bad rap here. Everyone wants to focus on what she did and not why.

Kim Cattrall wanted to do a SATC movie when the series ended. The movie was delayed. She asked for more money. It was leaked to the press that she was "demanding and a diva" and she was the reason for the holdup on the movie. She deserved to be paid exactly what SJP was paid for SATC. Full stop.

Fast forward to the second movie; rinse and repeat. They try to publicly malign her in the press because she wants more money; money that she deserves.

Third movie... Kim Cattrall says "I don't want to do a third movie." Now all of a sudden it is in the press that she "has all these demands. she wants money. they have to fund her projects, etc..." She goes on Piers Morgan to refute that report and state that her only demand was that "she didn't want to do a third movie." Why take the time to tarnish her reputation by leaking stories in the press? Why not just make the third movie and move on without Kim Cattrall? Why continue to ask her to do the SATC movies if she wants more money and if she's a diva?

SJP et al are fully aware that Kim Cattrall IS SATC; without her the franchise isn't as successful and the movies do not generate as much money, etc... So instead of risking failure, they publicly shame her, put future opportunities for her in jeopardy, and try to turn everyone against her. And based on the stories of Queen B SJP's behavior on set during the series, all of this is believable.

Kim Cattrall's IG post was basically a nail in the SATC coffin and a big FU to SJP so she will go away and leave her alone for good. At 61, she's tired of giving phucks about what people think; especially when she knows that SJP was a bitch to her and is probably behind all of the bad press that she is getting. #TeamKim

You are my soulmate. I absolutely agree with your every word.

This isn't some petty high school feud. This is about SJP leaking stories to the press and intentionally vilifying Cattrall, blaming her for a third movie not being made (won't somebody think of the fans!). SJP is a passive-aggressive phony who knows full well that her anti-Kim campaign is likely to damage Cattrall's career and livelihood. Aside from the movies being horrible, they can't make another one without Samantha. No one wants to see a 50-something year old Carrie bouncing around like Betsy Johnson. It's tired, but SJP doesn't care, and she has no range. She wants the paycheck, and Kim has repeatedly prevented SJP from cashing in.

If someone I had worked with for years dragged my name through the mud and threatened my career, I probably would have lost my cool, too. If SJP cared, she would have picked up the phone. Cattrall is in shock and in mourning; I'll give her a pass.

I'm sorry, Kim Cattrall IS SATC??? Um, no. Not even close. She was a caricature, the caricature, of the show. Look, I liked Samantha but she did not carry that show.

Anonymous wrote:Eh. As far back as this "feud" has gone on, there's really no one involved in the show who is on Team Kim as far as I can tell. Even Willie Garson and Evan Handler seemed pretty negative about Kim in this latest go-round. When no one comes out and takes your side other than "Blind Gossip", well...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Kim Cattrall is getting a bad rap here. Everyone wants to focus on what she did and not why.

Kim Cattrall wanted to do a SATC movie when the series ended. The movie was delayed. She asked for more money. It was leaked to the press that she was "demanding and a diva" and she was the reason for the holdup on the movie. She deserved to be paid exactly what SJP was paid for SATC. Full stop.

Fast forward to the second movie; rinse and repeat. They try to publicly malign her in the press because she wants more money; money that she deserves.

Third movie... Kim Cattrall says "I don't want to do a third movie." Now all of a sudden it is in the press that she "has all these demands. she wants money. they have to fund her projects, etc..." She goes on Piers Morgan to refute that report and state that her only demand was that "she didn't want to do a third movie." Why take the time to tarnish her reputation by leaking stories in the press? Why not just make the third movie and move on without Kim Cattrall? Why continue to ask her to do the SATC movies if she wants more money and if she's a diva?

SJP et al are fully aware that Kim Cattrall IS SATC; without her the franchise isn't as successful and the movies do not generate as much money, etc... So instead of risking failure, they publicly shame her, put future opportunities for her in jeopardy, and try to turn everyone against her. And based on the stories of Queen B SJP's behavior on set during the series, all of this is believable.

Kim Cattrall's IG post was basically a nail in the SATC coffin and a big FU to SJP so she will go away and leave her alone for good. At 61, she's tired of giving phucks about what people think; especially when she knows that SJP was a bitch to her and is probably behind all of the bad press that she is getting. #TeamKim

You are my soulmate. I absolutely agree with your every word.

This isn't some petty high school feud. This is about SJP leaking stories to the press and intentionally vilifying Cattrall, blaming her for a third movie not being made (won't somebody think of the fans!). SJP is a passive-aggressive phony who knows full well that her anti-Kim campaign is likely to damage Cattrall's career and livelihood. Aside from the movies being horrible, they can't make another one without Samantha. No one wants to see a 50-something year old Carrie bouncing around like Betsy Johnson. It's tired, but SJP doesn't care, and she has no range. She wants the paycheck, and Kim has repeatedly prevented SJP from cashing in.

If someone I had worked with for years dragged my name through the mud and threatened my career, I probably would have lost my cool, too. If SJP cared, she would have picked up the phone. Cattrall is in shock and in mourning; I'll give her a pass.

I'm sorry, Kim Cattrall IS SATC??? Um, no. Not even close. She was a caricature, the caricature, of the show. Look, I liked Samantha but she did not carry that show.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Kim Cattrall is getting a bad rap here. Everyone wants to focus on what she did and not why.

Kim Cattrall wanted to do a SATC movie when the series ended. The movie was delayed. She asked for more money. It was leaked to the press that she was "demanding and a diva" and she was the reason for the holdup on the movie. She deserved to be paid exactly what SJP was paid for SATC. Full stop.

Fast forward to the second movie; rinse and repeat. They try to publicly malign her in the press because she wants more money; money that she deserves.

Third movie... Kim Cattrall says "I don't want to do a third movie." Now all of a sudden it is in the press that she "has all these demands. she wants money. they have to fund her projects, etc..." She goes on Piers Morgan to refute that report and state that her only demand was that "she didn't want to do a third movie." Why take the time to tarnish her reputation by leaking stories in the press? Why not just make the third movie and move on without Kim Cattrall? Why continue to ask her to do the SATC movies if she wants more money and if she's a diva?

SJP et al are fully aware that Kim Cattrall IS SATC; without her the franchise isn't as successful and the movies do not generate as much money, etc... So instead of risking failure, they publicly shame her, put future opportunities for her in jeopardy, and try to turn everyone against her. And based on the stories of Queen B SJP's behavior on set during the series, all of this is believable.

Kim Cattrall's IG post was basically a nail in the SATC coffin and a big FU to SJP so she will go away and leave her alone for good. At 61, she's tired of giving phucks about what people think; especially when she knows that SJP was a bitch to her and is probably behind all of the bad press that she is getting. #TeamKim

You are my soulmate. I absolutely agree with your every word.

This isn't some petty high school feud. This is about SJP leaking stories to the press and intentionally vilifying Cattrall, blaming her for a third movie not being made (won't somebody think of the fans!). SJP is a passive-aggressive phony who knows full well that her anti-Kim campaign is likely to damage Cattrall's career and livelihood. Aside from the movies being horrible, they can't make another one without Samantha. No one wants to see a 50-something year old Carrie bouncing around like Betsy Johnson. It's tired, but SJP doesn't care, and she has no range. She wants the paycheck, and Kim has repeatedly prevented SJP from cashing in.

If someone I had worked with for years dragged my name through the mud and threatened my career, I probably would have lost my cool, too. If SJP cared, she would have picked up the phone. Cattrall is in shock and in mourning; I'll give her a pass.

Anonymous wrote:I think Kim Cattrall is getting a bad rap here. Everyone wants to focus on what she did and not why.

Kim Cattrall wanted to do a SATC movie when the series ended. The movie was delayed. She asked for more money. It was leaked to the press that she was "demanding and a diva" and she was the reason for the holdup on the movie. She deserved to be paid exactly what SJP was paid for SATC. Full stop.

Fast forward to the second movie; rinse and repeat. They try to publicly malign her in the press because she wants more money; money that she deserves.

Third movie... Kim Cattrall says "I don't want to do a third movie." Now all of a sudden it is in the press that she "has all these demands. she wants money. they have to fund her projects, etc..." She goes on Piers Morgan to refute that report and state that her only demand was that "she didn't want to do a third movie." Why take the time to tarnish her reputation by leaking stories in the press? Why not just make the third movie and move on without Kim Cattrall? Why continue to ask her to do the SATC movies if she wants more money and if she's a diva?

SJP et al are fully aware that Kim Cattrall IS SATC; without her the franchise isn't as successful and the movies do not generate as much money, etc... So instead of risking failure, they publicly shame her, put future opportunities for her in jeopardy, and try to turn everyone against her. And based on the stories of Queen B SJP's behavior on set during the series, all of this is believable.

Kim Cattrall's IG post was basically a nail in the SATC coffin and a big FU to SJP so she will go away and leave her alone for good. At 61, she's tired of giving phucks about what people think; especially when she knows that SJP was a bitch to her and is probably behind all of the bad press that she is getting. #TeamKim

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How on earth can anyone fault SJP in this when it’s Kim who wrote that horribly trashy IG post? Good grief, the woman has no class.

She's grieving for ffs and SJP does seem pretty obsessed with projecting a nice girl persona. She should have expressed her condolences privately if they were sincere!

Where is the IG post from SJP that is as rude at KC?

"Dearest Kim, my love and condolences to you and yours and Godspeed to your beloved brother. Xx."

The issue is that while I'm totally okay with believing that SJP is fake or that they have bad blood between them, Kim's response just makes Kim look bad.

This. Kim should have just completely ignored SJP's very gracious post, because she's only made herself look bad.

"Very gracious post" HAHAHA. One line on an IG post is your idea of very gracious? Wow, lucky Kim!

But this entire thread is about how SJP was so classless to post that one line. Now you want her to do more?

Look, obviously their relationship is strained. The gracious thing would not have been to post a flipping IG comment, which is about the bare minimum one can do, and instead perhaps send some lovely flowers with a sincere note. Or even just a personal note for that matter. If someone I had bad blood with posted that to me I'd prolly tell them to f off as well. It's tacky and insincere, not to mention just being showy for the audience for someone you know doesn't like you.

If KC meant what she said to SJP on instagram, a note or flowers wouldn't have been welcome either. She didn't want SJP to acknowledge it at all. Stop pretending there was some "right" way SJP could have sent her condolences without upsetting KC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If SJP really wanted to "reach out" to a colleague, she could have picked up the phone or sent an email, or even had the message go through Cattrall's publicist, to first guage if the contact would be welcome.

Instead she did it publicly, because she wanted to look like the good guy.

But that's what celebrities do. They all communicate via Twitter.

I read that her other costar who played Miranda also responded to her Instagram and Kim thanked her.

Nope.

Cynthia Nixon called.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If SJP really wanted to "reach out" to a colleague, she could have picked up the phone or sent an email, or even had the message go through Cattrall's publicist, to first guage if the contact would be welcome.

Instead she did it publicly, because she wanted to look like the good guy.

But that's what celebrities do. They all communicate via Twitter.

I read that her other costar who played Miranda also responded to her Instagram and Kim thanked her.

Anonymous wrote:PP who worked as at the show (DH is reading to the kids so I've got 30 to dish).

First of all, I cannot say how much of an amazing human Kristin is. My mother got seriously ill during shooting one year, I had taken two weeks off during filming and she was the one person who sent flowers to me and she wrote me this amazingly kind note. I STILL send her holiday cards. She's just a lovely, lovely person.

Kim was extremely professional. I think that's exactly how I would describe her. She isn't the character. She's much more reserved. She was quiet and she was kind. She (and Kristin) was actually the easiest to tailor for since her proportions didn't buck common fabric cutting too much. She was taller, though. One fun fact: they used capris a lot because we often had pants that were too short. Pat just decided to turn them into capris.