Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There was a lot of rumors last year about her leaving. Due to conflict/disagreement with the new principal. Have not heard anything recently. The new principal is viewed as "anti magnet."
Which is the right path to take. As more and more colleges look less at AP's (as they lose money off of them) and look at the overall person for admittance, magnets and IB's are starting to take a turn.
Colleges don't lose money because of AP courses. If credit is awarded, the space can be given to another student anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There was a lot of rumors last year about her leaving. Due to conflict/disagreement with the new principal. Have not heard anything recently. The new principal is viewed as "anti magnet."
You mean the new principal who came from TPMS where she supported the magnet there for years? She definitely had the view that it was one school not a magnet school and everyone else. But she is amazing. If you’re not happy please, please send her back to TPMS. She was loved by all, staff, students and parents. If there is a conflict with someone it’s not likely to be Ms Deeny’s issue.
Anonymous wrote:There was a lot of rumors last year about her leaving. Due to conflict/disagreement with the new principal. Have not heard anything recently. The new principal is viewed as "anti magnet."
Anonymous wrote:Reviving this thread. Apparently now both the principal and Ms. Hoover are now gone, which is probably a good thing based on reading the complaint. Have things improved in the IB program in the last year or two?
Anonymous wrote:
Class of 2008 - 98%
Class of 2009 - 96%
Class of 2010 - 94%
Class of 2011 - 94%
Class of 2012 - 97%
Class of 2013 - 92%
Class of 2014 - 88%
Class of 2015 - 93%
Class of 2016 - 86%
Class of 2017 - 88%
Class of 2018 - 86%
Class of 2019 - 90%