Anonymous wrote:I pay full freight. Im sick of hearing why I should pay for the children of unsuccessful people to attend my kids school. First, its unfair. Second, I dont want my children to be around the children of the poor- to witness their poor habits or the poor habits of their parents. Third, I dont want to mix with these parents- they are by definition, failures. Isnt private school supposed to be a way to keep your kids away from the poor?
Anonymous wrote:Most wealthy people are thieves...lets not kid ourselves. You can't get ahead in America unless you are lying, cheating and stealing. Yet, you feel entitled to judge others. Yeah, OK. Whatever. Carry-on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are people who aren't obscenely rich "failures"? They may be doing very important jobs you may need them for some day (cancer research, college teaching, etc). These are jobs that often pay a decent but not amazing salary yet require lots of education and knowledge and are contributing a lot to society. These people also likely value education and would like to send their kuds to private school. If they left their fields to do something that pays more (if that were even feasible), you'd be in a bind if you ever git sick or when you want to send your special snowflake to college.
I don't know, your argument doesn't really resonate with me. I live in a neighborhood with tons of really well educated people - Nobel prize winners,
Doctors, artists, writers, scientists, etc. - all of us value education. And all of us send our kids to local public school, which is excellent. I don't think your problem is FA. I think your problem is that you live in the wrong neighborhood.
Anonymous wrote:Why are people who aren't obscenely rich "failures"? They may be doing very important jobs you may need them for some day (cancer research, college teaching, etc). These are jobs that often pay a decent but not amazing salary yet require lots of education and knowledge and are contributing a lot to society. These people also likely value education and would like to send their kuds to private school. If they left their fields to do something that pays more (if that were even feasible), you'd be in a bind if you ever git sick or when you want to send your special snowflake to college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FA allows the top schools to be competitive. If only the rich attended then their admissions to to colleges would be lower. Wealth does not correlate with brains. My son is a FA recipient on his way to a ivy. We are grateful for the FA. But he did a lot for his school winning national awards etc. It works in both directions.
+1 same here.
Anonymous wrote:FA allows the top schools to be competitive. If only the rich attended then their admissions to to colleges would be lower. Wealth does not correlate with brains. My son is a FA recipient on his way to a ivy. We are grateful for the FA. But he did a lot for his school winning national awards etc. It works in both directions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I pay full freight. Im sick of hearing why I should pay for the children of unsuccessful people to attend my kids school. First, its unfair. Second, I dont want my children to be around the children of the poor- to witness their poor habits or the poor habits of their parents. Third, I dont want to mix with these parents- they are by definition, failures. Isnt private school supposed to be a way to keep your kids away from the poor?
Worthy of Jonathan Swift.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FA allows the top schools to be competitive. If only the rich attended then their admissions to to colleges would be lower. Wealth does not correlate with brains. My son is a FA recipient on his way to a ivy. We are grateful for the FA. But he did a lot for his school winning national awards etc. It works in both directions.
+1 same here.
Anonymous wrote:I pay full freight. Im sick of hearing why I should pay for the children of unsuccessful people to attend my kids school. First, its unfair. Second, I dont want my children to be around the children of the poor- to witness their poor habits or the poor habits of their parents. Third, I dont want to mix with these parents- they are by definition, failures. Isnt private school supposed to be a way to keep your kids away from the poor?
Anonymous wrote:FA allows the top schools to be competitive. If only the rich attended then their admissions to to colleges would be lower. Wealth does not correlate with brains. My son is a FA recipient on his way to a ivy. We are grateful for the FA. But he did a lot for his school winning national awards etc. It works in both directions.