Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:15:22, repeating your quotes from earlier in the thread does not make them any more persuasive.
1. Clinton's strong support for women. Women who work in the field of women's issues posted long, thoughtful commentary and specific examples of Hillary Clinton's work on behalf of women and girls. You say she gave a "nice speech" in Beijing and you're happy she supports Planned Parenthood. But you refused to give her credit for any of the other examples. Your criticism seems to boil down to (1) she could have done even more, (2) the Clinton Foundation charity accepted money from Saudi Arabia and other countries, and (3) your constant refrain of NAFTA & welfare reform.
2. Sanders' non-existent record on women's issues. You say he has a strong record on women's issues, and you say you "can't point to one moment in his entire career when he missed an opportunity to advocate for women." Well, there's a lot more you haven't pointed to: such as one single specific thing Sanders has accomplished for women. I'm not saying he's never done anything; I'm sure there is something in his record we could find. But you certainly haven't given us anything except vague and unsupported claims that he's strong on women's issues.
At this point, I think it's clear that Hillary Clinton has a far stronger record of work for women than Bernie Sanders.
I have posted many links and given plenty of concrete examples that you choose to ignore.
As far as which candidate really has a stronger record: It really depends on which issues are most important to you. If identity politics and the advancement of financially privileged women are the main points by which you define feminism, then you could say that Clinton is a "real" feminist.
If equality, fairness, justice, and the rights and protection of poor women, disadvantaged women, and working class women are part of your definition of feminist principles, then calling Clinton a feminist is quite a stretch. I understand the desire to minimize Clinton's contribution to legislation which has harmed women. I wouldn't want to think about that either if I was one of her enthusiastic supporters. If you believe the most important thing for the advancement of women is to have a woman president, perhaps it doesn't matter to you what her record has shown us about her values and principles. It really worries me. And I agree that she will probably be our next president.
JFC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:15:22, repeating your quotes from earlier in the thread does not make them any more persuasive.
1. Clinton's strong support for women. Women who work in the field of women's issues posted long, thoughtful commentary and specific examples of Hillary Clinton's work on behalf of women and girls. You say she gave a "nice speech" in Beijing and you're happy she supports Planned Parenthood. But you refused to give her credit for any of the other examples. Your criticism seems to boil down to (1) she could have done even more, (2) the Clinton Foundation charity accepted money from Saudi Arabia and other countries, and (3) your constant refrain of NAFTA & welfare reform.
2. Sanders' non-existent record on women's issues. You say he has a strong record on women's issues, and you say you "can't point to one moment in his entire career when he missed an opportunity to advocate for women." Well, there's a lot more you haven't pointed to: such as one single specific thing Sanders has accomplished for women. I'm not saying he's never done anything; I'm sure there is something in his record we could find. But you certainly haven't given us anything except vague and unsupported claims that he's strong on women's issues.
At this point, I think it's clear that Hillary Clinton has a far stronger record of work for women than Bernie Sanders.
I have posted many links and given plenty of concrete examples that you choose to ignore.
As far as which candidate really has a stronger record: It really depends on which issues are most important to you. If identity politics and the advancement of financially privileged women are the main points by which you define feminism, then you could say that Clinton is a "real" feminist.
If equality, fairness, justice, and the rights and protection of poor women, disadvantaged women, and working class women are part of your definition of feminist principles, then calling Clinton a feminist is quite a stretch. I understand the desire to minimize Clinton's contribution to legislation which has harmed women. I wouldn't want to think about that either if I was one of her enthusiastic supporters. If you believe the most important thing for the advancement of women is to have a woman president, perhaps it doesn't matter to you what her record has shown us about her values and principles. It really worries me. And I agree that she will probably be our next president.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Adding another area where Sanders' record shows he's not helping women. Immigration is a feminist issue. http://now.org/resource/immigration-as-a-feminist-issue/
Bernie Sanders "voted in the House with hard-line Republicans for indefinite detention for undocumented immigrants, and then he sided with those Republicans to stand with vigilantes known as Minutemen who were taking up outposts along the border to hunt down immigrants." http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/mar/10/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-says-bernie-sanders-supported-minu/
Where's was his support for women when he made these votes?
If you really want to understand that vote, which I doubt, it is very complicated and I do not have time to explain it but here is an article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/10/yes-bernie-sanders-voted-to-kill-immigration-reform-in-2007-but-its-complicated/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:15:22, repeating your quotes from earlier in the thread does not make them any more persuasive.
1. Clinton's strong support for women. Women who work in the field of women's issues posted long, thoughtful commentary and specific examples of Hillary Clinton's work on behalf of women and girls. You say she gave a "nice speech" in Beijing and you're happy she supports Planned Parenthood. But you refused to give her credit for any of the other examples. Your criticism seems to boil down to (1) she could have done even more, (2) the Clinton Foundation charity accepted money from Saudi Arabia and other countries, and (3) your constant refrain of NAFTA & welfare reform.
2. Sanders' non-existent record on women's issues. You say he has a strong record on women's issues, and you say you "can't point to one moment in his entire career when he missed an opportunity to advocate for women." Well, there's a lot more you haven't pointed to: such as one single specific thing Sanders has accomplished for women. I'm not saying he's never done anything; I'm sure there is something in his record we could find. But you certainly haven't given us anything except vague and unsupported claims that he's strong on women's issues.
At this point, I think it's clear that Hillary Clinton has a far stronger record of work for women than Bernie Sanders.
I have posted many links and given plenty of concrete examples that you choose to ignore.
As far as which candidate really has a stronger record: It really depends on which issues are most important to you. If identity politics and the advancement of financially privileged women are the main points by which you define feminism, then you could say that Clinton is a "real" feminist.
If equality, fairness, justice, and the rights and protection of poor women, disadvantaged women, and working class women are part of your definition of feminist principles, then calling Clinton a feminist is quite a stretch. I understand the desire to minimize Clinton's contribution to legislation which has harmed women. I wouldn't want to think about that either if I was one of her enthusiastic supporters. If you believe the most important thing for the advancement of women is to have a woman president, perhaps it doesn't matter to you what her record has shown us about her values and principles. It really worries me. And I agree that she will probably be our next president.
Anonymous wrote:15:22, repeating your quotes from earlier in the thread does not make them any more persuasive.
1. Clinton's strong support for women. Women who work in the field of women's issues posted long, thoughtful commentary and specific examples of Hillary Clinton's work on behalf of women and girls. You say she gave a "nice speech" in Beijing and you're happy she supports Planned Parenthood. But you refused to give her credit for any of the other examples. Your criticism seems to boil down to (1) she could have done even more, (2) the Clinton Foundation charity accepted money from Saudi Arabia and other countries, and (3) your constant refrain of NAFTA & welfare reform.
2. Sanders' non-existent record on women's issues. You say he has a strong record on women's issues, and you say you "can't point to one moment in his entire career when he missed an opportunity to advocate for women." Well, there's a lot more you haven't pointed to: such as one single specific thing Sanders has accomplished for women. I'm not saying he's never done anything; I'm sure there is something in his record we could find. But you certainly haven't given us anything except vague and unsupported claims that he's strong on women's issues.
At this point, I think it's clear that Hillary Clinton has a far stronger record of work for women than Bernie Sanders.
Anonymous wrote:Adding another area where Sanders' record shows he's not helping women. Immigration is a feminist issue. http://now.org/resource/immigration-as-a-feminist-issue/
Bernie Sanders "voted in the House with hard-line Republicans for indefinite detention for undocumented immigrants, and then he sided with those Republicans to stand with vigilantes known as Minutemen who were taking up outposts along the border to hunt down immigrants." http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/mar/10/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-says-bernie-sanders-supported-minu/
Where's was his support for women when he made these votes?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Women who work in the field of women's issues posted long, thoughtful commentary and specific examples of Hillary Clinton's work on behalf of women and girls.
As one of those experts, I'm glad *someone* ready my thoughts on First Lady, then Senator, then Secretary Clinton's work on behalf of girls and women.
Anonymous wrote:15:22, repeating your quotes from earlier in the thread does not make them any more persuasive.
1. Clinton's strong support for women. Women who work in the field of women's issues posted long, thoughtful commentary and specific examples of Hillary Clinton's work on behalf of women and girls. You say she gave a "nice speech" in Beijing and you're happy she supports Planned Parenthood. But you refused to give her credit for any of the other examples. Your criticism seems to boil down to (1) she could have done even more, (2) the Clinton Foundation charity accepted money from Saudi Arabia and other countries, and (3) your constant refrain of NAFTA & welfare reform.
2. Sanders' non-existent record on women's issues. You say he has a strong record on women's issues, and you say you "can't point to one moment in his entire career when he missed an opportunity to advocate for women." Well, there's a lot more you haven't pointed to: such as one single specific thing Sanders has accomplished for women. I'm not saying he's never done anything; I'm sure there is something in his record we could find. But you certainly haven't given us anything except vague and unsupported claims that he's strong on women's issues.
At this point, I think it's clear that Hillary Clinton has a far stronger record of work for women than Bernie Sanders.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think that you yourself are greatly minimizing Clinton's contribution and influence as first lady if you can state that she was "married to a man who..." Hillary Clinton worked hard for that policy and you should at least give her credit for her hard work.
I'm absolutely not minimizing her role and her contributions in many efforts to help women and girls around the world. IIRC, other posters have cited some of those efforts for you several pages ago. But you dismissed them all, and relentlessly focused this thread on TPP, NAFTA, CAFTA. Well, Clinton wasn't the person elected President when that legislation arrived at the White House, and she did not have the Presidential pen. We'll see what she does when she gets that pen in January 2017. I hope Senator Sanders will join with the Democrats to pass some legislation that might reach her desk.
I have not dismissed Clinton's contributions. I have said that she has done some good things but her record is a very mixed bag which does not add up to a consistently pro-woman candidate and she has also contributed to legislation that has been very harmful to women. If you want to follow Steinem go right ahead but there are a lot of feminists who are not very happy with her right now.
Oh yes, you did dismiss them. I was not a participant in that part of the thread, but I watched you do it. http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/60/546132.page
Two or three women who work on these issues day in and day out gave you loads of thoughtful detail about what Clinton has done. You blew it off as "gave a nice speech."
But when they asked for evidence of what Sanders has done, you offered nothing concrete.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand that gun control is an important topic but do you think you could start your own thread on this? You have posted tons of information and I, the OP, have agreed that stricter gun regulations would be a positive move for women and men. It has been covered.
No, I think Sanders' support for the gun industry and his opposition to many gun safety measures are highly relevant to this thread.
Your whole "feminist" argument against Clinton is a thinly stretched string of circumstances: Hillary was married to a man who signed legislation from Congress, which then led to certain economic effects that some people, 20 years later, have said had some negative impacts on women in various locations. With Sanders, we see his actual gun votes in Congress leading to connections to women dying in Vermont, and all over the United States. If your "evidence" is relevant to looking at Clinton, then the gun evidence is certainly relevant to looking at Sanders.
In fact, the thread's title says it's about Bernie Sanders, not Hillary Clinton. So I think your posts about Hillary are the ones that don't belong. My posts about Sanders' poor gun record of choosing the NRA over women are much more on-topic.
Also, did anyone mention that Hillary Clinton is endorsed by the following notable women:
Lilly Ledbetter
Gloria Steinem
current and former presidents of NOW
current president of NARAL
current president of Planned Parenthood
If Bernie Sanders is the "real feminist" in this race, why aren't these other feminists supporting him?
I have been very disappointed in Gloria Steinem, regarding this race. She actually said that young women were supporting Sanders because that is "where the boys are." I was stunned to see a comment like that from a feminist.
You are entitled to your opinion that gun control is a make or break issue for a candidate. I just think there are some other issues which need to be addressed first and Sanders is a supporter of background checks and other gun regulations. The NRA gave him a D minus rating...
I think that you yourself are greatly minimizing Clinton's contribution and influence as first lady if you can state that she was "married to a man who..." Hillary Clinton worked hard for that policy and you should at least give her credit for her hard work.
Okay. So you dismissed Steinem. How about the others? You know better than them too?
That is a weird argument. I am supposed to blindly follow the opinions of the presidents of NOW, NARAL, and PP? Do you know that there are are far more influential feminist thinkers out there? Those are big organizations but they do not dictate the opinions of feminists everywhere. They are voices in the discussion certainly but there are many that I would look to before I would look to them.
Never said anything about "blindly following". You addressed Steinem by dismissing her credibility. You didn't address the others. Now you've dismissed them as well. I think all of them have tremendous credibility and your need to dismiss them to cling to your "Hillary's not a feminist" stance makes your stance quite laughable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have been very disappointed in Gloria Steinem, regarding this race. She actually said that young women were supporting Sanders because that is "where the boys are." I was stunned to see a comment like that from a feminist.
With all due respect, I think Gloria Steinem and all the other women who have endorsed Hillary Clinton have a stronger record on knowing and promoting feminism than anyone on this thread, so I'll have to trust their opinions.
You are entitled to your opinion that gun control is a make or break issue for a candidate. I just think there are some other issues which need to be addressed first and Sanders is a supporter of background checks and other gun regulations. The NRA gave him a D minus rating...
IIRC, the NRA's ranking has ranged from D- to C-, depending on the year. It's undeniable that Sanders was helped into office by the NRA, and he's voted their way on several pieces of legislation. And for what it's worth, gun safety is not a "make or break" issue for me. It's just one of many reasons why I think Bernie Sanders is not a valid option for President.
I think that you yourself are greatly minimizing Clinton's contribution and influence as first lady if you can state that she was "married to a man who..." Hillary Clinton worked hard for that policy and you should at least give her credit for her hard work.
I'm absolutely not minimizing her role and her contributions in many efforts to help women and girls around the world. IIRC, other posters have cited some of those efforts for you several pages ago. But you dismissed them all, and relentlessly focused this thread on TPP, NAFTA, CAFTA. Well, Clinton wasn't the person elected President when that legislation arrived at the White House, and she did not have the Presidential pen. We'll see what she does when she gets that pen in January 2017. I hope Senator Sanders will join with the Democrats to pass some legislation that might reach her desk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand that gun control is an important topic but do you think you could start your own thread on this? You have posted tons of information and I, the OP, have agreed that stricter gun regulations would be a positive move for women and men. It has been covered.
No, I think Sanders' support for the gun industry and his opposition to many gun safety measures are highly relevant to this thread.
Your whole "feminist" argument against Clinton is a thinly stretched string of circumstances: Hillary was married to a man who signed legislation from Congress, which then led to certain economic effects that some people, 20 years later, have said had some negative impacts on women in various locations. With Sanders, we see his actual gun votes in Congress leading to connections to women dying in Vermont, and all over the United States. If your "evidence" is relevant to looking at Clinton, then the gun evidence is certainly relevant to looking at Sanders.
In fact, the thread's title says it's about Bernie Sanders, not Hillary Clinton. So I think your posts about Hillary are the ones that don't belong. My posts about Sanders' poor gun record of choosing the NRA over women are much more on-topic.
Also, did anyone mention that Hillary Clinton is endorsed by the following notable women:
Lilly Ledbetter
Gloria Steinem
current and former presidents of NOW
current president of NARAL
current president of Planned Parenthood
If Bernie Sanders is the "real feminist" in this race, why aren't these other feminists supporting him?
I have been very disappointed in Gloria Steinem, regarding this race. She actually said that young women were supporting Sanders because that is "where the boys are." I was stunned to see a comment like that from a feminist.
You are entitled to your opinion that gun control is a make or break issue for a candidate. I just think there are some other issues which need to be addressed first and Sanders is a supporter of background checks and other gun regulations. The NRA gave him a D minus rating...
I think that you yourself are greatly minimizing Clinton's contribution and influence as first lady if you can state that she was "married to a man who..." Hillary Clinton worked hard for that policy and you should at least give her credit for her hard work.
Okay. So you dismissed Steinem. How about the others? You know better than them too?
That is a weird argument. I am supposed to blindly follow the opinions of the presidents of NOW, NARAL, and PP? Do you know that there are are far more influential feminist thinkers out there? Those are big organizations but they do not dictate the opinions of feminists everywhere. They are voices in the discussion certainly but there are many that I would look to before I would look to them.