Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Way more hoodrats and landscapers than NIH GS13s. While there are a bunch, it doesn’t even have the highest concentration which is up 355. People act like if a couple of low paid lawyers live in a mixed part of town they claim that defines the area. There is 10 low income residents in silver spring TP for every professional. That doesn’t make it a white collar part of town
You're focused on the wrong question. The question isn't "Are the kids of NIH GS15s the majority in Takoma Park?"
No one would argue that is the case.
What PP was pointing to, though, was a totally different question. "Are the top 2% of kids in Takoma Park likely to be just as competitive for Blair magnet as the top 2% of kids from Whitman or whatever?"
OP made a pretty specific claim - that kids in Takoma Park and Silver Spring must be benefiting from some sort of affirmative action if admitted to the competitive test-based magnet programs. The obvious retort to that is that there exist plenty of kids in Takoma Park and Silver Spring who are just as smart, and well-supported, and driven, as kids in other parts of the county, and as a result those kids don't need affirmative action to be admitted.
Also, check your English grammar before throwing around words like hoodrats.
Kids in Takoma Park have the only magnetvstyle elementary school and the 25 reserved spots at TPMS magnet, so theres that.
This.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Way more hoodrats and landscapers than NIH GS13s. While there are a bunch, it doesn’t even have the highest concentration which is up 355. People act like if a couple of low paid lawyers live in a mixed part of town they claim that defines the area. There is 10 low income residents in silver spring TP for every professional. That doesn’t make it a white collar part of town
You're focused on the wrong question. The question isn't "Are the kids of NIH GS15s the majority in Takoma Park?"
No one would argue that is the case.
What PP was pointing to, though, was a totally different question. "Are the top 2% of kids in Takoma Park likely to be just as competitive for Blair magnet as the top 2% of kids from Whitman or whatever?"
OP made a pretty specific claim - that kids in Takoma Park and Silver Spring must be benefiting from some sort of affirmative action if admitted to the competitive test-based magnet programs. The obvious retort to that is that there exist plenty of kids in Takoma Park and Silver Spring who are just as smart, and well-supported, and driven, as kids in other parts of the county, and as a result those kids don't need affirmative action to be admitted.
Also, check your English grammar before throwing around words like hoodrats.
Kids in Takoma Park have the only magnetvstyle elementary school and the 25 reserved spots at TPMS magnet, so theres that.
Anonymous wrote:Way more hoodrats and landscapers than NIH GS13s. While there are a bunch, it doesn’t even have the highest concentration which is up 355. People act like if a couple of low paid lawyers live in a mixed part of town they claim that defines the area. There is 10 low income residents in silver spring TP for every professional. That doesn’t make it a white collar part of town
You're focused on the wrong question. The question isn't "Are the kids of NIH GS15s the majority in Takoma Park?"
No one would argue that is the case.
What PP was pointing to, though, was a totally different question. "Are the top 2% of kids in Takoma Park likely to be just as competitive for Blair magnet as the top 2% of kids from Whitman or whatever?"
OP made a pretty specific claim - that kids in Takoma Park and Silver Spring must be benefiting from some sort of affirmative action if admitted to the competitive test-based magnet programs. The obvious retort to that is that there exist plenty of kids in Takoma Park and Silver Spring who are just as smart, and well-supported, and driven, as kids in other parts of the county, and as a result those kids don't need affirmative action to be admitted.
Also, check your English grammar before throwing around words like hoodrats.
Way more hoodrats and landscapers than NIH GS13s. While there are a bunch, it doesn’t even have the highest concentration which is up 355. People act like if a couple of low paid lawyers live in a mixed part of town they claim that defines the area. There is 10 low income residents in silver spring TP for every professional. That doesn’t make it a white collar part of town
Anonymous wrote:All blair SMAC students attend tutoring. They receiving tutoring for math competition, science bowl, research at near by colleges or NIST, cimputer or IT related competitions. I wish my kid was as smart, driven, hardworking as those kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC will be in 9th grade in a W high school. Did not make it to Blair SMAC magnet. Talking to others I get a feeling that very few (2 or 3) students from MS made it to Blair though MS is one of the very good schools, with so many bright kids. Why is it that the screening committee would prefer to select a student from non w school area over the one from w school with former having equal or lesser scores? Why is this assumption made that a student from silver spring would benefit more from Blair magnet than the one who would go to Churchill or Walter Johnson or Wooten.
OP, you are basically saying this:
1. My child, in one of the middle schools in Bethesda or Potomac, was not accepted to the Blair SMAC magnet.
2. Only a few children in that middle school were accepted.
3. There are a lot of smart children in that middle school.
4. Therefore the Blair magnet admissions are biased against children from middle schools in Bethesda or Potomac.
+1
Plus, many or most Whitman parents think Whitman is so good that it doesn't make sense to send their kid to Blair.
+2 Here's the thing folks may not know about Silver Spring, Kensington, Takoma Park, and other places on the eastern side of the county - there are A TON of college professors, NIH and other government scientists, public and private school teachers, etc. We care about our children's education as much as you do. We help our kids achieve their potential as much as you do.
Your kids are not smarter or more motivated by virtue of attending a "W" school. You just need to accept that your child, like many other kids, was beaten fair and square. There's no conspiracy. Very few kids make the cut, and yours didn't. Be glad you have a good program to fall back on.
Anonymous wrote:DC will be in 9th grade in a W high school. Did not make it to Blair SMAC magnet. Talking to others I get a feeling that very few (2 or 3) students from MS made it to Blair though MS is one of the very good schools, with so many bright kids. Why is it that the screening committee would prefer to select a student from non w school area over the one from w school with former having equal or lesser scores? Why is this assumption made that a student from silver spring would benefit more from Blair magnet than the one who would go to Churchill or Walter Johnson or Wooten.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sure is silly but, yes, when many people talk about W schools that includes Winston Churchill.
Churchill
Whitman
Wooton
WJ
It's not silly, all 4 W schools have a W in the first name or the last lame:
Walt Whitman
Winston Churchill
Thomas Wootton
Walter Johnson
Anonymous wrote:"In 11th grade, students write a research proposal and have to find a mentor outside of the school (at a govt. lab or university lab) to work with. They spend two months during the summer before 12th grade doing the research with their mentor (very often as part of the mentor's larger research group) and write a paper and presentation during the first semester of 12th grade. Many of these papers and presentations are entered into competitions. They do receive a lot of support from the senior scientist in this effort and are supervised by a Blair science teacher but I don't think it is accurate to describe it as tutoring."
Bullshit. They wash dishes at the lab and then write up what the lab was doing. You don't do groundbreaking research in 2 months!!!
When will we stop deluding ourselves?