Anonymous wrote:Can someone clarify for me why, in all the options, They include Rosemary Hills? It only goes through second grade...makes no sense to me?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Just eye-balling it, but 5 & 6 look like they have the shortest maximum distance from the furthest house to the school.
But nobody is going to school by crow.
Anonymous wrote:
Just eye-balling it, but 5 & 6 look like they have the shortest maximum distance from the furthest house to the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Really? Option 5 seems like the most natural geographic boundary. Followed by option 6. I would suggest either of those.
One middle school is in the northeast corner of the cluster, and the other middle school is in the southwest corner. Perhaps you could explain to me why splitting the cluster into west and east is more geographically natural than splitting the cluster into north and south?
Anonymous wrote:Can someone clarify for me why, in all the options, They include Rosemary Hills? It only goes through second grade...makes no sense to me?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was anyone at the meeting to hear the discussions? These proposals are very interesting. I find it interesting that they're not even analyzing walkability at this point.
The #1 consolidated proposed criterion for evaluating these options is minimizing distance to school, including time on the bus, walking, and biking.
http://gis.mcpsmd.org/boundarystudypdfs/BCCMS2_Meeting2Materials.pdf
This is how the boundary study process works:
1. The boundary study committees propose criteria for evaluating the options
2. MCPS presents options
3. The boundary study committees evaluate the options based on those criteria
The criterion are not ranked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was anyone at the meeting to hear the discussions? These proposals are very interesting. I find it interesting that they're not even analyzing walkability at this point.
The #1 consolidated proposed criterion for evaluating these options is minimizing distance to school, including time on the bus, walking, and biking.
http://gis.mcpsmd.org/boundarystudypdfs/BCCMS2_Meeting2Materials.pdf
This is how the boundary study process works:
1. The boundary study committees propose criteria for evaluating the options
2. MCPS presents options
3. The boundary study committees evaluate the options based on those criteria
Anonymous wrote:
Really? Option 5 seems like the most natural geographic boundary. Followed by option 6. I would suggest either of those.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Option #5 is North Chevy Chase ES, Rock Creek Forest ES and all of Rosemary Hills ES to B-CC MS #2; Bethesda ES, Chevy Chase ES, Somerset ES and Westbrook ES to Westland Middle School.
I'm going to say right now that Option #5 is not happening.
Really? Option 5 seems like the most natural geographic boundary. Followed by option 6. I would suggest either of those.
Anonymous wrote:Option #5 is North Chevy Chase ES, Rock Creek Forest ES and all of Rosemary Hills ES to B-CC MS #2; Bethesda ES, Chevy Chase ES, Somerset ES and Westbrook ES to Westland Middle School.
I'm going to say right now that Option #5 is not happening.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have lots of friends at RCF and RH who mercifully have no idea that so many people are afraid of their children.
They're just happy to not have to go to silver spring schools but deep down they know that one thing isn't quite like the others.
What does this sentence mean?
Anonymous wrote:Was anyone at the meeting to hear the discussions? These proposals are very interesting. I find it interesting that they're not even analyzing walkability at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Was anyone at the meeting to hear the discussions? These proposals are very interesting. I find it interesting that they're not even analyzing walkability at this point.