Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, the real solution is to build another ES in upper NW DC, which is not going to happen but is the natural solution when all neighboring schools are also overcrowded. Then some ES will need to be rezoned to Hardy.
Is Wilsok over crowded?
The last thing we need to do is build another ES in upper NW. If Eaton (45% IB) and Hearst (27% IB) had realistic boundaries and average W3 IB participation rates (85%), there would space for 359 kids.
If Janney parents to prefer to have kids sitting on each other laps, so be it.
Hearst is only desirable to Janney parents if they can fully take it over and reconfigure it to their specific needs (a la an early childhood campus for Janney). Of course, the needs and desires of current Hearst families weren't even considered because apparently Janney has a birth right over all things Ward 3.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The proposal around making Hearst PK-2 and Janney 3-5 would mean that those in the Hearst boundary would attend Janney for grades 3-5. So this is not about making Hearst a "Janney annex," but rather a way of reallocating students to deal with building capacity issues.
Makes sense. Which is why it will not happen.
Anonymous wrote:Hands off Hearst, mo-fos.
Anonymous wrote:The proposal around making Hearst PK-2 and Janney 3-5 would mean that those in the Hearst boundary would attend Janney for grades 3-5. So this is not about making Hearst a "Janney annex," but rather a way of reallocating students to deal with building capacity issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OOB Students should have to reapply for middle school and high school.
Discussed and rejected during the DME boundary process. Not going to happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The proposal around making Hearst PK-2 and Janney 3-5 would mean that those in the Hearst boundary would attend Janney for grades 3-5. So this is not about making Hearst a "Janney annex," but rather a way of reallocating students to deal with building capacity issues.
Sort of like the Peabody-Watkins model.
Anonymous wrote:The proposal around making Hearst PK-2 and Janney 3-5 would mean that those in the Hearst boundary would attend Janney for grades 3-5. So this is not about making Hearst a "Janney annex," but rather a way of reallocating students to deal with building capacity issues.
Anonymous wrote:The proposal around making Hearst PK-2 and Janney 3-5 would mean that those in the Hearst boundary would attend Janney for grades 3-5. So this is not about making Hearst a "Janney annex," but rather a way of reallocating students to deal with building capacity issues.
Anonymous wrote:I'd like to see an updated report from the DME's office about how the numbers are changing, so we all can see whether last year's plan is still on track to solve anything. I fear a tidal wave of kids is coming from several schools that will swamp Deal and Wilson in the coming years.
Anonymous wrote:OOB Students should have to reapply for middle school and high school.