jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.
I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.
I think that if there were one issue on which we might be able to find broad agreement among all the posters here, it would be child rape. Nobody here condones it. Yet, rather than seeking such agreement, you chose to exploit the issue as one more partisan issue with which to attack Obama. You put partisanship ahead of morality on this issue.
In a conflict with very few good choices and lots of bad ones, our leaders have frequently been forced to choose among various bad options. As a result, we have crossed moral thresholds on things like torture and domestic surveillance that diverge significantly from the values Americans have traditionally held dear. Some, including me, would argue that such moral compromises are reasons to avoid such conflicts in the first place. The situation with child rape in Afghanistan is simply one more instance of morality being sacrificed for expediency. Our leaders have prioritized wining the military and political struggles above the protection of children from sexual abuse.
I think all of us, Republicans, Libertarians, Democrats, Socialists, and none-of-the-aboves, should give thought to the various moral compromises that are made in the name of war. Individuals from different political views have been able to work together to push back on some compromises such as domestic surveillance. We should equally be able to put aside our differences in order to stand united against child rape. But, that can't happen if the goal of attacking Obama is placed above the goal of combatting the sexual abuse of children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.
I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the dcum world this doesn't matter because they were only little boys. Now if it had been little girls all kind of hell would break loose on the thread. Sickening.
In what imaginary world are you getting that people are reacting like it doesn't matter? The chip on your shoulder is so big it's blocking your vision.
Anonymous wrote:In the dcum world this doesn't matter because they were only little boys. Now if it had been little girls all kind of hell would break loose on the thread. Sickening.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok.general. I've actually said you will not find official.orders, just intent to do what's expedient to preserve the mission. Me thinks you know this and me thinks you doth protest too.much.
And the reason this is hitting the fan.is people are being prosecuted under this administration for basically whistle blowing this ..not super smart if you want to sweep something under the rug.or pretend its not something you have condones, if not overtly then tacitly.
Don't argue with the morally bankrupt. It's not worth your time.
Get lost with that "morally bankrupt" bullshit. Not a single poster here has condoned child rape. Not one. That is not even open for debate, and it is grotesquely insulting, offensive and highly immoral that, in your partisan zeal to malign and slander, you repeatedly insisted on lying about that earlier.
The ONLY thing left here for debate is whether or not it was policy that came all the way from the top.
Anonymous wrote:Well, we mutilate newborn boys' penises, so I don't think we have the moral high ground.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok.general. I've actually said you will not find official.orders, just intent to do what's expedient to preserve the mission. Me thinks you know this and me thinks you doth protest too.much.
And the reason this is hitting the fan.is people are being prosecuted under this administration for basically whistle blowing this ..not super smart if you want to sweep something under the rug.or pretend its not something you have condones, if not overtly then tacitly.
Don't argue with the morally bankrupt. It's not worth your time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.
I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.
You mean Rev. Wright?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.
I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.
Anonymous wrote:Ok.general. I've actually said you will not find official.orders, just intent to do what's expedient to preserve the mission. Me thinks you know this and me thinks you doth protest too.much.
And the reason this is hitting the fan.is people are being prosecuted under this administration for basically whistle blowing this ..not super smart if you want to sweep something under the rug.or pretend its not something you have condones, if not overtly then tacitly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.
I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You have no idea how the military works. You think there is an order stating disregard all child rape? You're the idiot.
Matter of fact, I do know how the military works, I served. Did you? I doubt it.
Yes, I do..as someone who stokes the home front while.loved ones are in harms way I would say I do. And I know all about how commanders intent is conveyed down the chain.
Oh, you know more than someone who actually served, when you didn't serve, yourself? Stand back everyone, we got us a badass here....
"I didn't serve in the military, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn"
As for how you think the military works.... Apparently you think official policy on how to deal with pedophiles just passed verbally, word of mouth from the Commander In Chief, to the Pentagon, to the Commanding General, down through the brass, all verbal, all the way down to 1.3 million active duty sailors, soldiers and airmen out in the field. Riiiiiiiight.
Do you have any clue whatsoever just how utterly ludicrous that sounds? No. I don't think you even remotely grasp just how bizarrely out of touch your posts are.
I"m not the PP but I do know that Obama is the Commander in Chief. Are you suggesting he has no clue this has occurred?
And it's not just about this Marine. There's more - three soldiers died:
http://therightscoop.com/marine-faces-dishonorable-discharge-after-warning-soldiers-of-taliban-insider-threat/
The SAME Afghan abuses were going on for 7 years under George W. Bush. And, the same Afghan abuses were going on 100 years ago when the Brits were in charge. Are you suggesting none of them had any clue what was going on either?
Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.