Anonymous wrote:Just because you get a perfect Act score does not mean that Harvard is required to accept you.
Also, just because you are Valedictorian, Harvard is not required to accept you.
My sister was Val. of a great high school and had near perfect scores but she was not accepted. we did not read anything into this. She is blonde and blue eyed by the way. she went to Stanford and loved it.
There are many students who get perfect or near perfect scores on standardized tests.
This Asian applicant's "activities" were lacking. One sport and a couple of volunteer activities is underwhelming.
The Ivies are looking for a well rounded class of students and leadership qualities.
Anonymous wrote:I had a lot of Asian classmates at my elite private university and they tended to underwhelm. They were good enough at taking tests to get in, but they didn't seem to thrive as much on their own as other students without their parents to direct them. They also were definitely less involved in organizations that made the place hum with activity. I can absolutely understand why top schools want to have a diverse student body that is selected on the basis of things other than test scores. If anything, they ought to do more to recognize the potential of poor whites, blacks and Hispanics.
Anonymous wrote:Checkout which group is really "over-represented" at top colleges and which group is really underrepresented:
http://philebersole.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/eliteenrollment-large.jpg
Anonymous wrote:Why would Asians want to go to UNC? It sucks at STEM.
Anonymous wrote:Why would Asians want to go to UNC? It sucks at STEM.
Anonymous wrote:I had a lot of Asian classmates at my elite private university and they tended to underwhelm. They were good enough at taking tests to get in, but they didn't seem to thrive as much on their own as other students without their parents to direct them. They also were definitely less involved in organizations that made the place hum with activity. I can absolutely understand why top schools want to have a diverse student body that is selected on the basis of things other than test scores. If anything, they ought to do more to recognize the potential of poor whites, blacks and Hispanics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Arab-Americans are discriminated against, but there are no preferences for them in college. So are Jewish-Americans in many instances. I would imagine that it's difficult to achieve as a Muslim-American woman in the US. I think that's why it's problematic to only identify certain groups as worthy of a second look, different standard and not others. Any kid who has ever had a teacher unable to pronounce his name, been compared to Osama Bin laden, laughed at because she had an accent, etc. should perhaps get that look.
Are they underrepresented in higher education? If yes, then they should get a second look. If no, then they shouldn't. Of course there are particular instances, but if you're looking for a bright-line rule, then that's the only one that seems coherent.
If there's some "I was discriminated against as an Arab-American woman, and my mom couldn't go to school in her home country" background, then that should definitely go in an essay.
I wonder what people make of the "discrimination" against girl applicants. After all, it's harder to get in as a girl than a boy, all other factors being equal. So is that a lawsuit we need to start?
Women are given preferential treatment in admission to the MIT, CalTech, etc schools.
Great. How about all the other non-tech schools.
which is why on page one i said white girls should be on the side of asian-americans on this.
Nah. I'm a white girl, but I still think racism matters and URMs should get a bump.
If racism matters, then racism against Asian Americans matter as well both racism in general and the racism in college admissions.
Yes but since Asians are not underrepresented, you're not showing racism that impacts educational attainment.
If we are going to go back to the proportional representation, we have to be consistent and talk about proportional representation in other areas as well.
For example, Asian Americans should make up 6% of the Judges in this country. Asian Americans should make up 6% of the politicians in this country. Asian Americans should make up 6% of the CEOs of fortune 500 companies. Asian Americans should make up 6% of the actors in movies and TVs. Asian Americans should make up 6% of the professional athletes in this country etc. The list is almost endless.
The point is, why is it that one area (academics) where Asians apparently are "over-represented" a major problem but the fact that Asian Americans are severely "under-represented" in virtually all other areas never a problem?
The proportional argument should be applied consistently for all areas not just one or two.
Because we value education differently. And because we are talking about education here. If Asians are underrepresented as ceo's or judges that's an issue, but not related to college admissions.
Anonymous wrote:
I think you are confusing "Asians" with "Asian Americans" living in the US. Under your logic it would be like saying "don't whites have an entire continent already? I am sure there are some top schools in UK or France that whites ought to be able to attend." Asian Americans immigrated to this country just like you did and whites did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Arab-Americans are discriminated against, but there are no preferences for them in college. So are Jewish-Americans in many instances. I would imagine that it's difficult to achieve as a Muslim-American woman in the US. I think that's why it's problematic to only identify certain groups as worthy of a second look, different standard and not others. Any kid who has ever had a teacher unable to pronounce his name, been compared to Osama Bin laden, laughed at because she had an accent, etc. should perhaps get that look.
Are they underrepresented in higher education? If yes, then they should get a second look. If no, then they shouldn't. Of course there are particular instances, but if you're looking for a bright-line rule, then that's the only one that seems coherent.
If there's some "I was discriminated against as an Arab-American woman, and my mom couldn't go to school in her home country" background, then that should definitely go in an essay.
I wonder what people make of the "discrimination" against girl applicants. After all, it's harder to get in as a girl than a boy, all other factors being equal. So is that a lawsuit we need to start?
Women are given preferential treatment in admission to the MIT, CalTech, etc schools.
Great. How about all the other non-tech schools.
which is why on page one i said white girls should be on the side of asian-americans on this.
Nah. I'm a white girl, but I still think racism matters and URMs should get a bump.
If racism matters, then racism against Asian Americans matter as well both racism in general and the racism in college admissions.
Yes but since Asians are not underrepresented, you're not showing racism that impacts educational attainment.
If we are going to go back to the proportional representation, we have to be consistent and talk about proportional representation in other areas as well.
For example, Asian Americans should make up 6% of the Judges in this country. Asian Americans should make up 6% of the politicians in this country. Asian Americans should make up 6% of the CEOs of fortune 500 companies. Asian Americans should make up 6% of the actors in movies and TVs. Asian Americans should make up 6% of the professional athletes in this country etc. The list is almost endless.
The point is, why is it that one area (academics) where Asians apparently are "over-represented" a major problem but the fact that Asian Americans are severely "under-represented" in virtually all other areas never a problem?
The proportional argument should be applied consistently for all areas not just one or two.