Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm glad to hear that your son enjoys art class. This does not change rhe fact that, as reflected in the PTA survey comducted last Spring, there is room for substantial improvement and better coordination with other curricula. The National Gallery is only a 20 minute walk from Brent and yet our children have yet to take a field trip there in the past three years. Forget about the Corcoran snd Philips, or even the Sackler, Renwick, or Portrait Gallery. Don't forget, art instruction is mandated and funded by DCPS, as opposed to science, which Brent is really fortunate to have due to the gemerosity of parents.
I'm not saying there's no room for improvement. I just think that improving art isn't a huge issue and doesn't mean the school isn't good.
Weird that a museum studies school would not to have more museum field tripes.
Also isn't it the classroom teachers job to teach science?
Anonymous wrote:DCPS is mandating art instruction, in addition to PE and world language, and pays for a full-time imstructor. This requires students to spend 45 minutes per week in art class, in a school buildong with its own kiln. Should parents not be expecting sophisticated instruction during this time, particularly when Brent still touts itself as a museum magnet school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm glad to hear that your son enjoys art class. This does not change rhe fact that, as reflected in the PTA survey comducted last Spring, there is room for substantial improvement and better coordination with other curricula. The National Gallery is only a 20 minute walk from Brent and yet our children have yet to take a field trip there in the past three years. Forget about the Corcoran snd Philips, or even the Sackler, Renwick, or Portrait Gallery. Don't forget, art instruction is mandated and funded by DCPS, as opposed to science, which Brent is really fortunate to have due to the gemerosity of parents.
I'm not saying there's no room for improvement. I just think that improving art isn't a huge issue and doesn't mean the school isn't good.
Weird that a museum studies school would not to have more museum field tripes.
Also isn't it the classroom teachers job to teach science?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm glad to hear that your son enjoys art class. This does not change rhe fact that, as reflected in the PTA survey comducted last Spring, there is room for substantial improvement and better coordination with other curricula. The National Gallery is only a 20 minute walk from Brent and yet our children have yet to take a field trip there in the past three years. Forget about the Corcoran snd Philips, or even the Sackler, Renwick, or Portrait Gallery. Don't forget, art instruction is mandated and funded by DCPS, as opposed to science, which Brent is really fortunate to have due to the gemerosity of parents.
I'm not saying there's no room for improvement. I just think that improving art isn't a huge issue and doesn't mean the school isn't good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This isn't quite true, only a few of the elementary schools in Upper NW have ever been granted "autonomous," status over the years, e.g. Murch but not Lafayette. Brent hasn't. But the distinction isn't very meaningful. Leadership and quality of instruction are much more important.
I think you are ill informed about DCPS's autonomous schools. They include schools all around DC, not just some upper northwest schools that were "granted" that status. Brent was part of it some years ago but no longer is. Here is more on DC's autonomous schools:
https://sites.google.com/a/dc.gov/together-dc3/home
Your link is to the the DC Collaborative. That is totally different from autonomous status.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This isn't quite true, only a few of the elementary schools in Upper NW have ever been granted "autonomous," status over the years, e.g. Murch but not Lafayette. Brent hasn't. But the distinction isn't very meaningful. Leadership and quality of instruction are much more important.
I think you are ill informed about DCPS's autonomous schools. They include schools all around DC, not just some upper northwest schools that were "granted" that status. Brent was part of it some years ago but no longer is. Here is more on DC's autonomous schools:
https://sites.google.com/a/dc.gov/together-dc3/home
Anonymous wrote:This isn't quite true, only a few of the elementary schools in Upper NW have ever been granted "autonomous," status over the years, e.g. Murch but not Lafayette. Brent hasn't. But the distinction isn't very meaningful. Leadership and quality of instruction are much more important.
Anonymous wrote:This isn't quite true, only a few of the elementary schools in Upper NW have ever been granted "autonomous," status over the years, e.g. Murch but not Lafayette. Brent hasn't. But the distinction isn't very meaningful. Leadership and quality of instruction are much more important.
Anonymous wrote:My kid is currently in K (and we're totally happy with the program). I guess I don't understand what happens in first and above. I mean, the cohort - all high-SES kids of highly educated parents - remains the same. Are upper grades slaves to some DCPS curriculum that is way too easy for this cohort? If DCPS is mandating some curriculum, wouldn't it be the same at all schools, including the much touted JKLMM? I mean, these are all kids of lawyers, doctors, nuclear physicists, etc., - they are ALL pretty smart. Are posters saying that Brent utterly fails to meet these kids' smarts starting in first?
Anonymous wrote:This thread is just insane.