Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe the law allows for tracking, and for testing to be done for tracking. A school could well test for proficiency and if the incoming student is several grade levels behind what they consider appropriate, they could put them in that lower grade level. So if someone had ideas about having their unprepared 4th grader going to a school where they would only be on par with 1st graders, the school could place them in 1st grade.
I'm sure that makes sense in your brain, and it sounds like you're making a sincere effort to add to this conversation. But this is a horrible idea - a 4th grader is 9-10 yrs old. 1st graders are 6-7 yrs old. Putting a 10 yr old in with 6 yr olds? Do you have any sense of how that would be for the 10 yr old from a socio-emotional perspective? And how older kids would see and probably tease that 10 yr old for being in a 1st grade class? This is a terrible idea.
That's the point. It's a terrible idea to put a 9-10 year old in with 6-7 year olds, but it's also just as terrible of an idea to put a kid with little or no Mandarin proficiency in with an immersion group of kids who are 4 years in.
So because the kid is not on fourth grade level Mandarin, Spanish! French, whatever, the kid should be held back academically if she wants to learn a second language. How ridiculous. What if the kid is on grade level or above in English or math.
Isn't the point of immersion to be that the language is part of the ENTIRE curriculum? Meaning, for that 4th grade math you also need to know the Mandarin terms involved, to include all Mandarin math terms for grade 1-4? It sounds like you aren't really grasping the concept of immersion and instead think it's just a separate Mandarin class.
Anonymous wrote:Hi everyone! I'm very late to this discussion and haven't read all 17 pages. But I **LOVE** Yu Ying, so I thought I'd share my opinions here, like it or not!
1. "Go start your own Mandarin immersion school if you don't like it."
Actually, sooner or later, this will happen! Just like we have at least two DC charters that teach Spanish, there is more than enough demand for a second Chinese charter school. Perhaps one that focused on traditional characters instead of simplified? Or which offered elective Cantonese? Don't underestimate what DC parents can create.
2. "Yu Ying was just started by a bunch of parents with no experience in education"
And what an amazing job these parents have done! A top-ranked charter school, new campus, international high school, IB accreditation. Applause for the parents! And think of what would have happened had the teacher's unions and "professional" educators been allowed to continue with business as usual before the charter schools came.
3. "I believe the law allows for tracking"
Yes, in fact, Yu Ying already tracks its uppermost grade! And it needs to! Not all kids are going to be at the same level of Chinese; they vary tremendously. Therefore the need to track. Most all schools "track" students in English readers; the advanced kids don't read the same books as the remedial readers.
4. "We need a way to test-in older kids who already speak some Mandarin" Yes, we do, and YY will find a way to do it! The main issue is that students are lost due to natural attrition in the older grades. Let the new students in to replace them! If they speak Mandarin already all the better!
That's it for now guys! Sorry if I seem obnoxiously positive, but some people don't realize what a GREAT school we have and prefer to pick petty fights here! Appreciate what we have!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe the law allows for tracking, and for testing to be done for tracking. A school could well test for proficiency and if the incoming student is several grade levels behind what they consider appropriate, they could put them in that lower grade level. So if someone had ideas about having their unprepared 4th grader going to a school where they would only be on par with 1st graders, the school could place them in 1st grade.
I'm sure that makes sense in your brain, and it sounds like you're making a sincere effort to add to this conversation. But this is a horrible idea - a 4th grader is 9-10 yrs old. 1st graders are 6-7 yrs old. Putting a 10 yr old in with 6 yr olds? Do you have any sense of how that would be for the 10 yr old from a socio-emotional perspective? And how older kids would see and probably tease that 10 yr old for being in a 1st grade class? This is a terrible idea.
That's the point. It's a terrible idea to put a 9-10 year old in with 6-7 year olds, but it's also just as terrible of an idea to put a kid with little or no Mandarin proficiency in with an immersion group of kids who are 4 years in.
So because the kid is not on fourth grade level Mandarin, Spanish! French, whatever, the kid should be held back academically if she wants to learn a second language. How ridiculous. What if the kid is on grade level or above in English or math.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe the law allows for tracking, and for testing to be done for tracking. A school could well test for proficiency and if the incoming student is several grade levels behind what they consider appropriate, they could put them in that lower grade level. So if someone had ideas about having their unprepared 4th grader going to a school where they would only be on par with 1st graders, the school could place them in 1st grade.
I'm sure that makes sense in your brain, and it sounds like you're making a sincere effort to add to this conversation. But this is a horrible idea - a 4th grader is 9-10 yrs old. 1st graders are 6-7 yrs old. Putting a 10 yr old in with 6 yr olds? Do you have any sense of how that would be for the 10 yr old from a socio-emotional perspective? And how older kids would see and probably tease that 10 yr old for being in a 1st grade class? This is a terrible idea.
That's the point. It's a terrible idea to put a 9-10 year old in with 6-7 year olds, but it's also just as terrible of an idea to put a kid with little or no Mandarin proficiency in with an immersion group of kids who are 4 years in.
Anonymous wrote:...but no one is proposing the latter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe the law allows for tracking, and for testing to be done for tracking. A school could well test for proficiency and if the incoming student is several grade levels behind what they consider appropriate, they could put them in that lower grade level. So if someone had ideas about having their unprepared 4th grader going to a school where they would only be on par with 1st graders, the school could place them in 1st grade.
I'm sure that makes sense in your brain, and it sounds like you're making a sincere effort to add to this conversation. But this is a horrible idea - a 4th grader is 9-10 yrs old. 1st graders are 6-7 yrs old. Putting a 10 yr old in with 6 yr olds? Do you have any sense of how that would be for the 10 yr old from a socio-emotional perspective? And how older kids would see and probably tease that 10 yr old for being in a 1st grade class? This is a terrible idea.
Anonymous wrote:Hi everyone! I'm very late to this discussion and haven't read all 17 pages. But I **LOVE** Yu Ying, so I thought I'd share my opinions here, like it or not!
1. "Go start your own Mandarin immersion school if you don't like it."
Actually, sooner or later, this will happen! Just like we have at least two DC charters that teach Spanish, there is more than enough demand for a second Chinese charter school. Perhaps one that focused on traditional characters instead of simplified? Or which offered elective Cantonese? Don't underestimate what DC parents can create.
2. "Yu Ying was just started by a bunch of parents with no experience in education"
And what an amazing job these parents have done! A top-ranked charter school, new campus, international high school, IB accreditation. Applause for the parents! And think of what would have happened had the teacher's unions and "professional" educators been allowed to continue with business as usual before the charter schools came.
3. "I believe the law allows for tracking"
Yes, in fact, Yu Ying already tracks its uppermost grade! And it needs to! Not all kids are going to be at the same level of Chinese; they vary tremendously. Therefore the need to track. Most all schools "track" students in English readers; the advanced kids don't read the same books as the remedial readers.
4. "We need a way to test-in older kids who already speak some Mandarin" Yes, we do, and YY will find a way to do it! The main issue is that students are lost due to natural attrition in the older grades. Let the new students in to replace them! If they speak Mandarin already all the better!
That's it for now guys! Sorry if I seem obnoxiously positive, but some people don't realize what a GREAT school we have and prefer to pick petty fights here! Appreciate what we have!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:YY was started by a bunch of parents. I believe only one or two of the founders had experience in education. For everyone on this board who wants a mandarin test-in school, go start your own charter, and you can send your children to that school. However, you will need to open it in another jurisdiction. The federal mandate prohibits it for charter schools in the District.
This X 100. None of these people who think they're smart enough to insist on what is better for YY were around when the hard decisions and work were being done. Now that it's successful so far, they want to change it and are mystified why it's not changing (hmmm maybe because YY isn't allowed to change it?). Quit griping and start your own schools. Won't hold my breath though, since some of you sound so used to everyone doing everything for you, you wouldn't get past step 1. Starting and running schools is incredibly hard work - for starters, they need to be able to do this while dealing with impossible parents like you! I don't envy them their jobs at all.
It's interesting that all the complaints come from people who don't have kids at Yu Ying... go start your own Mandarin immersion school if you don't like it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:YY was started by a bunch of parents. I believe only one or two of the founders had experience in education. For everyone on this board who wants a mandarin test-in school, go start your own charter, and you can send your children to that school. However, you will need to open it in another jurisdiction. The federal mandate prohibits it for charter schools in the District.
This X 100. None of these people who think they're smart enough to insist on what is better for YY were around when the hard decisions and work were being done. Now that it's successful so far, they want to change it and are mystified why it's not changing (hmmm maybe because YY isn't allowed to change it?). Quit griping and start your own schools. Won't hold my breath though, since some of you sound so used to everyone doing everything for you, you wouldn't get past step 1. Starting and running schools is incredibly hard work - for starters, they need to be able to do this while dealing with impossible parents like you! I don't envy them their jobs at all.
Anonymous wrote:I believe the law allows for tracking, and for testing to be done for tracking. A school could well test for proficiency and if the incoming student is several grade levels behind what they consider appropriate, they could put them in that lower grade level. So if someone had ideas about having their unprepared 4th grader going to a school where they would only be on par with 1st graders, the school could place them in 1st grade.
Anonymous wrote:YY was started by a bunch of parents. I believe only one or two of the founders had experience in education. For everyone on this board who wants a mandarin test-in school, go start your own charter, and you can send your children to that school. However, you will need to open it in another jurisdiction. The federal mandate prohibits it for charter schools in the District.