Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Many strategies, some lost cost, could be explored (e.g.using community volunteers, my MIL, fluent in Mandarin and Cantonese, would be glad to help).
Who would advocate for a child to be pulled out of a classroom with a teacher (or two) to receive instruction from someone's mother in law? And why aren't these kids that you speak of getting language support from home? My children are. They have a Chinese tutor and I tutor them in English.
I agree that something might be able to be done to lure in more Cantonese applicants, but we are still talking about a couple hundred kids CITY-WIDE who will still have to go through the lottery process like everyone else. If less than 1% of the city's children are native speakers of Chinese it would be lucky to net more than 20 additional students with whatever outreach is used.
. All the posts about how the Mandarin immersion schools are in NY and San Fran are ridiculous in comparison to DC b/c DC is not NYC or San Francisco with their large Chinese populations, with many Cantonese speakers, etc. These schools obviously serves their populations and communities well. It is certainly arguable YY does the same given what it has, the district of columbia with <1% Chinese.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Less assimilated families do seem to avoid YY. Anybody disagree? Can't see this changing without a change in administration.
Don't disagree. I'm Chinese, at YY, and speak a dialect crappily. YY, friendly and supportive school though it is, acts like low & medium-SES DC Chinese don't exist. The school caters to high-SES Asians and whites, and AA families all over the map.
Chinese immersion schools elsewhere are different. I have family in Honolulu involved in a dual-immersion program (which provides targetted "dialect transition" support) and they don't think much of our kid's Mandarin, in an upper grade. We're getting a chinese au pair to try to catch up.
Why would less assimilated families be interested in a Chinese immersion school? Recent immigrants want their kids to learn English. It does not matter if the school is dual-immersion with targeted "dialect transition" or a school like YY. The native speakers who move to the U.S. want their kids to learn English and go to Harvard like other Asian immigrant parents. Immersion schools by their very design attracts native English speakers who want their children to learn another language usually this means higher SES families who care about such things thus the high number of higher SES families at YY.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Less assimilated families do seem to avoid YY. Anybody disagree? Can't see this changing without a change in administration.
Don't disagree. I'm Chinese, at YY, and speak a dialect crappily. YY, friendly and supportive school though it is, acts like low & medium-SES DC Chinese don't exist. The school caters to high-SES Asians and whites, and AA families all over the map.
Chinese immersion schools elsewhere are different. I have family in Honolulu involved in a dual-immersion program (which provides targetted "dialect transition" support) and they don't think much of our kid's Mandarin, in an upper grade. We're getting a chinese au pair to try to catch up.
How large is the targeted population in Honolulu. I am just wondering if it is greater than the >1% Chinese American population in DC.
Anonymous wrote:
Many strategies, some lost cost, could be explored (e.g.using community volunteers, my MIL, fluent in Mandarin and Cantonese, would be glad to help).
Anonymous wrote:Isn't Thompson a DCPS Chinese immersion school. How many Chinese speaking families send their children to Thompson. What's the percentage?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Less assimilated families do seem to avoid YY. Anybody disagree? Can't see this changing without a change in administration.
Don't disagree. I'm Chinese, at YY, and speak a dialect crappily. YY, friendly and supportive school though it is, acts like low & medium-SES DC Chinese don't exist. The school caters to high-SES Asians and whites, and AA families all over the map.
Chinese immersion schools elsewhere are different. I have family in Honolulu involved in a dual-immersion program (which provides targetted "dialect transition" support) and they don't think much of our kid's Mandarin, in an upper grade. We're getting a chinese au pair to try to catch up.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone think about logistics when making such sweeping suggestions? Limited resources and reality of limited choices make it really unrealistic to think the school should do pull-out dialect support to maybe a dozen kids per dialect spread over 6 grades (I'm just guessing about the representation of the different dialects- I really have no idea). It could POSSIBLY help attract more families in the long run, but in the immediate timeframe it would pull resources from the existing student population. Sorry, but I can't see the benefit to supporting Cantonese at a Mandarin school in the elementary level. What would the kids need to give up and how would it help them learn English and Mandarin?