Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you've posted on the last four pages, I'm sick of you. Stop, just stop. You need a time out.

There are several people here arguing with the Ranting Atheist (or pagan, or whatever). I'm one of them, but I'm not the one you just said you're sick of. Congrats, though! Apparently several people find your nasty, childish behavior abhorrent!

Anonymous wrote:If you've posted on the last four pages, I'm sick of you. Stop, just stop. You need a time out.

Anonymous wrote:"Your "religious beliefs" deserve no more respect than my beliefs about who the "Best Band of the 90s" is. Seriously. I don't fucking care. You don't get to believe nonsense with zero justification, and then award yourself "special sensitivity points" on top of that. Grow a thicker skin."

Should I not respond to the ranting atheist? I suppose not, but I'm wondering why you can't understand that anyone's deeply held beliefs -- things they would die for -- deserve more respect than you show. I might not understand why someone believes in a deity, but as a fellow human being that person deserves respect. You might believe very strongly that some unproven alternative therapy will cure your dying child. I am not going to mock you for your belief. I might believe that prayer will help (either the child or me). Would you mock me in that situation?

Anonymous wrote:

It was a joke, you oversensitive twat. Aren't you people supposed to be "too blessed to be stressed?" Otherwise what's the damned point. Your perpetual state of high dudgeon is tiresome.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, it was just a little friendly advice. I figured you'd totally mischaracterize my points and call me names, and that's exactly what you did.

So no surprises there. And for the record, you can call me all the names you want, but at the end of the day I'm still a (democratic) national merit scholarship semifinalist, and you're still an arrogant loser whose main debating strategies seem to consist of twisting my words and ad hominem attacks.

Bye, loser.

This is fucking hilarious. I bet you keep the swim medals you won when you were 8 framed and hanging on the wall.

Good job, national merit scholarship semifinalist! Good job!

Gosh, you gave sort of a lukewarm response. I think we should all give a high-five and say, "EXCELLENT JOB!!"

Your exploding head is making a real mess of this thread. I'm out of here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, it was just a little friendly advice. I figured you'd totally mischaracterize my points and call me names, and that's exactly what you did.

So no surprises there. And for the record, you can call me all the names you want, but at the end of the day I'm still a (democratic) national merit scholarship semifinalist, and you're still an arrogant loser whose main debating strategies seem to consist of twisting my words and ad hominem attacks.

Bye, loser.

This is fucking hilarious. I bet you keep the swim medals you won when you were 8 framed and hanging on the wall.

Good job, national merit scholarship semifinalist! Good job!

Gosh, you gave sort of a lukewarm response. I think we should all give a high-five and say, "EXCELLENT JOB!!"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Scholarly articles start with a summary. What I hate is posters who still won't budge from an ignorant point of view even when presented with 10 sources of scholarly research.

Well, it is called 'faith'.

RAWPGG - Ranting Atheist Who Plays Gotcha Games. If you respond, she'll call you over-sensitive. She'll feel so pleased with herself, because this is probably the only thing going on in her sad little life that actually produces the result she wants.

So don't play her game by responding to this.

It was a joke, you oversensitive twat. Aren't you people supposed to be "too blessed to be stressed?" Otherwise what's the damned point. Your perpetual state of high dudgeon is tiresome.

Anonymous wrote:

It was a joke, you oversensitive twat. Aren't you people supposed to be "too blessed to be stressed?" Otherwise what's the damned point. Your perpetual state of high dudgeon is tiresome.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, it was just a little friendly advice. I figured you'd totally mischaracterize my points and call me names, and that's exactly what you did.

So no surprises there. And for the record, you can call me all the names you want, but at the end of the day I'm still a (democratic) national merit scholarship semifinalist, and you're still an arrogant loser whose main debating strategies seem to consist of twisting my words and ad hominem attacks.

Bye, loser.

This is fucking hilarious. I bet you keep the swim medals you won when you were 8 framed and hanging on the wall.

Good job, national merit scholarship semifinalist! Good job!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Scholarly articles start with a summary. What I hate is posters who still won't budge from an ignorant point of view even when presented with 10 sources of scholarly research.

Well, it is called 'faith'.

RAWPGG - Ranting Atheist Who Plays Gotcha Games. If you respond, she'll call you over-sensitive. She'll feel so pleased with herself, because this is probably the only thing going on in her sad little life that actually produces the result she wants.

So don't play her game by responding to this.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
national merit scholarship semifinalist

1st prize ...a car
2nd prize...a set of steak knives
3rd prize...your fired.

Semifinal? Really...


It's "you're", not "your".

Signed,

A member of grammar police.

Oh, I forgot to mention... I've got popcorn!

Your trapped in a box.