Anonymous wrote:It looks like this amendment is likely to fail at this point. The early voter turnout from red areas is much higher than blue areas. Eg. The early voter turnout from Republican Fauquier county is 5.4%. The turnout from Fairfax county is only 2.6%. There is a very strong gradient between the percentage share of the county that voted republican in 2024 and the early voter turnout. This data also suggests that even within counties republicans are more likely to vote on this amendment than Dems. Unless turnout improves in democratic leaning areas, this amendment is likely to fail or it will be approved by a very slim margin.
Anonymous wrote:I loathe MAGA, but I also loathed Biden-Harris and dem sanctimony.
And I believe in protecting the vote of my fellow Virginians, even those who are “different” from me. Voting no.
Anonymous wrote:It looks like this amendment is likely to fail at this point. The early voter turnout from red areas is much higher than blue areas. Eg. The early voter turnout from Republican Fauquier county is 5.4%. The turnout from Fairfax county is only 2.6%. There is a very strong gradient between the percentage share of the county that voted republican in 2024 and the early voter turnout. This data also suggests that even within counties republicans are more likely to vote on this amendment than Dems. Unless turnout improves in democratic leaning areas, this amendment is likely to fail or it will be approved by a very slim margin.
Anonymous wrote:It looks like this amendment is likely to fail at this point. The early voter turnout from red areas is much higher than blue areas. We Eg. The early voter turnout from Republican Fauquier county is 5.4%. The turnout from Fairfax county is only 2.6%. There is a very strong gradient between the percentage share of the county that voted republican in 2024 and the early voter turnout. This data also suggests that even within counties republicans are more likely to vote on this amendment than Dems. Unless turnout improves in democratic leaning areas, this amendment is likely to fail or it will be approved by a very slim margin.
Anonymous wrote:It looks like this amendment is likely to fail at this point. The early voter turnout from red areas is much higher than blue areas. Eg. The early voter turnout from Republican Fauquier county is 5.4%. The turnout from Fairfax county is only 2.6%. There is a very strong gradient between the percentage share of the county that voted republican in 2024 and the early voter turnout. This data also suggests that even within counties republicans are more likely to vote on this amendment than Dems. Unless turnout improves in democratic leaning areas, this amendment is likely to fail or it will be approved by a very slim margin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:22 point swing to the GOP in the special election, Rice over Smith.
Can’t have that, can we Dems…
Republican district votes for Republican. Shocker.
If anything, it shows how Republicans no longer show up for Trump.
The growth is the point. And it shows how much the current legislature is despised.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Venn diagram of people who strutted around and bleated "elections have consequences" after Trump won and the people who are whining about Democratic overreach in redistricting is a perfect circle. GMAFB.
That was Obama's line!
That’s why MAGA loves it so much.
That makes absolutely no sense. But remember, without Obama's divisiveness (that line is the perfect example), Trump never gets elected and there is no MAGA. Thanks, Obama!
No, it makes perfect sense. A decade after leaving office and you're still hysterical about having had a black president. I wonder what you have to say about Trump's divisiveness! Wait, never mind, I already know that you love it because "he's telling it like it is," or something.
Funny how the PP never responded to this.
There's nothing to respond to. Read your own words. You actually said "Wait, never mind". Remember you somehow already know what I think. You're convinced I'm a racist, MAGA, Trump supporter, so what's the point?
Again, remember that saying about "assume". And you you really should work on your reading comprehension, along with your Shakespeare quotes.
You are making some ASSumptions and confusing posters. I didn’t write any of those comments.
If you thought Obama was “divisive”, please share your thoughts on Trump.
My apologies. I assumed and the old saying proved true.
Trump is obviously very divisive as well. I won't even put that in quotations.
You consider Obama “very divisive” when compared to Trump? GMAFB.
That's not what I said, but whatever. So no thanks, I won't give you a f'ing break
“ Trump is obviously very divisive as well “
That's not comparing them. You're desperately trying to find a "gotcha" moment that just isn't there. Give it a rest.
Anonymous wrote:I didn't realize the WaPo editorial board was allowed to write about anything except how rich people are overtaxed. I guess Bezos granted them an exemption to write about a different topic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:22 point swing to the GOP in the special election, Rice over Smith.
Can’t have that, can we Dems…
Republican district votes for Republican. Shocker.
If anything, it shows how Republicans no longer show up for Trump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Venn diagram of people who strutted around and bleated "elections have consequences" after Trump won and the people who are whining about Democratic overreach in redistricting is a perfect circle. GMAFB.
That was Obama's line!
That’s why MAGA loves it so much.
That makes absolutely no sense. But remember, without Obama's divisiveness (that line is the perfect example), Trump never gets elected and there is no MAGA. Thanks, Obama!
No, it makes perfect sense. A decade after leaving office and you're still hysterical about having had a black president. I wonder what you have to say about Trump's divisiveness! Wait, never mind, I already know that you love it because "he's telling it like it is," or something.
Funny how the PP never responded to this.
There's nothing to respond to. Read your own words. You actually said "Wait, never mind". Remember you somehow already know what I think. You're convinced I'm a racist, MAGA, Trump supporter, so what's the point?
Again, remember that saying about "assume". And you you really should work on your reading comprehension, along with your Shakespeare quotes.
You are making some ASSumptions and confusing posters. I didn’t write any of those comments.
If you thought Obama was “divisive”, please share your thoughts on Trump.
My apologies. I assumed and the old saying proved true.
Trump is obviously very divisive as well. I won't even put that in quotations.
You consider Obama “very divisive” when compared to Trump? GMAFB.
That's not what I said, but whatever. So no thanks, I won't give you a f'ing break
“ Trump is obviously very divisive as well “
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every one of you (presumably Democrats?) that rabidly call anyone voting no a MAGA or Trumper or conscienceless...you are turning Independents that vote on issues against Dem candidates in local and state elections. I have never voted for a Republican president btw but think both parties are deeply flawed and started thinking that in 1970.
If you've been polarized by anonymous posts on an internet forum, congratulations, you are admitting your own profound irrationality.
If you don't remember that accurately referring to people as deplorable had consequences then congratulations you have selective amnesia. Contempt has consequences. Trump told them they were his best supporters and they still are.