Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In terms of a current analysis, this site placed Bowdoin fifth among LACs by selectivity, after Barnard, Swarthmore, Pomona and Williams:
College & University Rankings in 2026 https://wallethub.com/edu/e/college-rankings/40750
Wallethub rankings aren’t very good.
If not fifth, where do you think Bowdoin should place by selectivity among LACs?
Bowdoin and Amherst have artificially low acceptance rates because they advertise themselves as need blind for international applicants. Bowdoin is very selective. There is no significant difference in selectivity for any of the top 10 or so SLACs and Bowdoin is in that group.
The number of international applicants to these two is not much higher than others.
It is significantly higher.
Exactly. Bowdoin cheats the admissions game, but these schools will do anything to pretend they’re elite.
Wow. You clearly have a lot of angst towards Bowdoin. Still getting over being dinged? Or slow day on the cul de sac in rural nowheresville, admiring your degree from a Tier 3 school?
You hold a lot of anger.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In terms of a current analysis, this site placed Bowdoin fifth among LACs by selectivity, after Barnard, Swarthmore, Pomona and Williams:
College & University Rankings in 2026 https://wallethub.com/edu/e/college-rankings/40750
Wallethub rankings aren’t very good.
If not fifth, where do you think Bowdoin should place by selectivity among LACs?
Bowdoin and Amherst have artificially low acceptance rates because they advertise themselves as need blind for international applicants. Bowdoin is very selective. There is no significant difference in selectivity for any of the top 10 or so SLACs and Bowdoin is in that group.
The number of international applicants to these two is not much higher than others.
It is significantly higher.
Exactly. Bowdoin cheats the admissions game, but these schools will do anything to pretend they’re elite.
Wow. You clearly have a lot of angst towards Bowdoin. Still getting over being dinged? Or slow day on the cul de sac in rural nowheresville, admiring your degree from a Tier 3 school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In terms of a current analysis, this site placed Bowdoin fifth among LACs by selectivity, after Barnard, Swarthmore, Pomona and Williams:
College & University Rankings in 2026 https://wallethub.com/edu/e/college-rankings/40750
Wallethub rankings aren’t very good.
If not fifth, where do you think Bowdoin should place by selectivity among LACs?
Bowdoin and Amherst have artificially low acceptance rates because they advertise themselves as need blind for international applicants. Bowdoin is very selective. There is no significant difference in selectivity for any of the top 10 or so SLACs and Bowdoin is in that group.
The number of international applicants to these two is not much higher than others.
It is significantly higher.
Exactly. Bowdoin cheats the admissions game, but these schools will do anything to pretend they’re elite.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In terms of a current analysis, this site placed Bowdoin fifth among LACs by selectivity, after Barnard, Swarthmore, Pomona and Williams:
College & University Rankings in 2026 https://wallethub.com/edu/e/college-rankings/40750
Wallethub rankings aren’t very good.
If not fifth, where do you think Bowdoin should place by selectivity among LACs?
Bowdoin and Amherst have artificially low acceptance rates because they advertise themselves as need blind for international applicants. Bowdoin is very selective. There is no significant difference in selectivity for any of the top 10 or so SLACs and Bowdoin is in that group.
The number of international applicants to these two is not much higher than others.
It is significantly higher.
Exactly. Bowdoin cheats the admissions game, but these schools will do anything to pretend they’re elite.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In terms of a current analysis, this site placed Bowdoin fifth among LACs by selectivity, after Barnard, Swarthmore, Pomona and Williams:
College & University Rankings in 2026 https://wallethub.com/edu/e/college-rankings/40750
Wallethub rankings aren’t very good.
If not fifth, where do you think Bowdoin should place by selectivity among LACs?
Bowdoin and Amherst have artificially low acceptance rates because they advertise themselves as need blind for international applicants. Bowdoin is very selective. There is no significant difference in selectivity for any of the top 10 or so SLACs and Bowdoin is in that group.
The number of international applicants to these two is not much higher than others.
Oh, the horror of being able to offer large amounts of scholarship money. What a terrible terrible fact!Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In terms of a current analysis, this site placed Bowdoin fifth among LACs by selectivity, after Barnard, Swarthmore, Pomona and Williams:
College & University Rankings in 2026 https://wallethub.com/edu/e/college-rankings/40750
Wallethub rankings aren’t very good.
If not fifth, where do you think Bowdoin should place by selectivity among LACs?
Bowdoin and Amherst have artificially low acceptance rates because they advertise themselves as need blind for international applicants. Bowdoin is very selective. There is no significant difference in selectivity for any of the top 10 or so SLACs and Bowdoin is in that group.
The number of international applicants to these two is not much higher than others.
It is significantly higher.
Exactly. Bowdoin cheats the admissions game, but these schools will do anything to pretend they’re elite.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In terms of a current analysis, this site placed Bowdoin fifth among LACs by selectivity, after Barnard, Swarthmore, Pomona and Williams:
College & University Rankings in 2026 https://wallethub.com/edu/e/college-rankings/40750
Wallethub rankings aren’t very good.
If not fifth, where do you think Bowdoin should place by selectivity among LACs?
Bowdoin and Amherst have artificially low acceptance rates because they advertise themselves as need blind for international applicants. Bowdoin is very selective. There is no significant difference in selectivity for any of the top 10 or so SLACs and Bowdoin is in that group.
The number of international applicants to these two is not much higher than others.
It is significantly higher.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In terms of a current analysis, this site placed Bowdoin fifth among LACs by selectivity, after Barnard, Swarthmore, Pomona and Williams:
College & University Rankings in 2026 https://wallethub.com/edu/e/college-rankings/40750
Wallethub rankings aren’t very good.
If not fifth, where do you think Bowdoin should place by selectivity among LACs?
Bowdoin and Amherst have artificially low acceptance rates because they advertise themselves as need blind for international applicants. Bowdoin is very selective. There is no significant difference in selectivity for any of the top 10 or so SLACs and Bowdoin is in that group.
The number of international applicants to these two is not much higher than others.
Anonymous wrote:They don't just "advertise" themselves as such. 90% of Amherst international students are on aid, with an average grant in the high 70 thousands (from what I remember)Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In terms of a current analysis, this site placed Bowdoin fifth among LACs by selectivity, after Barnard, Swarthmore, Pomona and Williams:
College & University Rankings in 2026 https://wallethub.com/edu/e/college-rankings/40750
Wallethub rankings aren’t very good.
If not fifth, where do you think Bowdoin should place by selectivity among LACs?
Bowdoin and Amherst have artificially low acceptance rates because they advertise themselves as need blind for international applicants. Bowdoin is very selective. There is no significant difference in selectivity for any of the top 10 or so SLACs and Bowdoin is in that group.
They don't just "advertise" themselves as such. 90% of Amherst international students are on aid, with an average grant in the high 70 thousands (from what I remember)Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In terms of a current analysis, this site placed Bowdoin fifth among LACs by selectivity, after Barnard, Swarthmore, Pomona and Williams:
College & University Rankings in 2026 https://wallethub.com/edu/e/college-rankings/40750
Wallethub rankings aren’t very good.
If not fifth, where do you think Bowdoin should place by selectivity among LACs?
Bowdoin and Amherst have artificially low acceptance rates because they advertise themselves as need blind for international applicants. Bowdoin is very selective. There is no significant difference in selectivity for any of the top 10 or so SLACs and Bowdoin is in that group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The app increases are pretty obvious in some respects. Social houses, Maine is beautiful, college owning private islands and having various climate/environmental research institutes appealing to a generation concerned with climate change, amazing food, great social culture known for being filled with nice people, and if you’re desperate for civilization, you can get cheap tickets to Boston from Portland.
Williams is nice, but the culture is a bit overly serious and intense with no access to the rest of the world. Amherst is hit or miss for a lot of people. Bowdoin, along with Pomona, is a feel-good lac with nice vibes that younger kids like. It may get a slight boost in apps from Mamdani also.
Colby also owns private island, strong env focus.
Yes but it’s nowhere near well endowed Bowdoin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The app increases are pretty obvious in some respects. Social houses, Maine is beautiful, college owning private islands and having various climate/environmental research institutes appealing to a generation concerned with climate change, amazing food, great social culture known for being filled with nice people, and if you’re desperate for civilization, you can get cheap tickets to Boston from Portland.
Williams is nice, but the culture is a bit overly serious and intense with no access to the rest of the world. Amherst is hit or miss for a lot of people. Bowdoin, along with Pomona, is a feel-good lac with nice vibes that younger kids like. It may get a slight boost in apps from Mamdani also.
Colby also owns private island, strong env focus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In terms of a current analysis, this site placed Bowdoin fifth among LACs by selectivity, after Barnard, Swarthmore, Pomona and Williams:
College & University Rankings in 2026 https://wallethub.com/edu/e/college-rankings/40750
Wallethub rankings aren’t very good.
If not fifth, where do you think Bowdoin should place by selectivity among LACs?
Bowdoin and Amherst have artificially low acceptance rates because they advertise themselves as need blind for international applicants. Bowdoin is very selective. There is no significant difference in selectivity for any of the top 10 or so SLACs and Bowdoin is in that group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In terms of a current analysis, this site placed Bowdoin fifth among LACs by selectivity, after Barnard, Swarthmore, Pomona and Williams:
College & University Rankings in 2026 https://wallethub.com/edu/e/college-rankings/40750
Wallethub rankings aren’t very good.
If not fifth, where do you think Bowdoin should place by selectivity among LACs?